No coincidence

Eric Nummela

doi:10.2307/3616509

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Lange, Marc 2014. Aspects of Mathematical Explanation: Symmetry, Unity, and Salience. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 123, Issue. 4, p. 485.

Lange, Marc 2015. Explanation, Existence and Natural Properties in Mathematics - A Case Study: Desargues’ Theorem. Dialectica, Vol. 69, Issue. 4, p. 435.

Lange, Marc 2018. Mathematical Explanations that are Not Proofs. Erkenntnis, Vol. 83, Issue. 6, p. 1285.

De Rizzo, Julio 2021. Explaining coincidences. Synthese, Vol. 199, Issue. 5-6, p. 14843.

Baras, Dan 2021. How can necessary facts call for explanation?. Synthese, Vol. 198, Issue. 12, p. 11607.

Lange, Marc 2022. Inference to the Best Explanation Is an Important Form of Reasoning in Mathematics. The Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 32.

Lange, Marc 2022. Inference to the best explanation as supporting the expansion of mathematicians’ ontological commitments. Synthese, Vol. 200, Issue. 2,

Lange, Marc 2022. Challenges Facing Counterfactual Accounts of Explanation in Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 32.

Article contents

No coincidence

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests