Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T02:54:00.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cycling digits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2021

Bob Burn*
Affiliation:
School of Education, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2LU

Extract

Cyclic pairs

2 x 13 = 31 in base 5.

3 x 15 = 51 in base 7.

2 x 25 = 52 in base 8.

4 x 17 = 71 in base 9.

2 x 37 = 73 in base 11.

5 x 19 = 91 in base 11.

When you transpose the digits of a two digit number and obtain a multiple of the original, the original may be called a “cyclic pair”. I have before me, a computer printout obtained by Mr F. B. Satterthwaite of 439 East 51st Street, New York 10022, exhibiting all the cyclic pairs for which the multiple of the original obtained by transposing the digits is ⩽ 16. This computer printout exhibits patterns of many kinds. The most striking pattern that Satterthwaite identified was that cyclic pairs do not exist when the base is one less than a prime number, but do exist for every other base ⩾ 5. His claim may be substantiated as follows.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)