Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T03:09:05.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Range of the First Three Eigenvalues of the Planar Dirichlet Laplacian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2010

Michael Levitin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, U. K.M. Levitin@ma.hw.ac.uk, http://www.ma.hw.ac.uk/~levitin
Rustem Yagudin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, U. K.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Extensive numerical experiments have been conducted by the authors, aimed at finding the admissible range of the ratios of the first three eigenvalues of a planar Dirichlet Laplacian. The results improve the previously known theoretical estimates of M. Ashbaugh and R. Benguria. Some properties of a maximizer of the ratio λ31 are also proved in the paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © London Mathematical Society 2003

References

1Ashbaugh, M.S., ‘Isoperimetric and universal inequalities for eigenvalues’, Spectral theory and geometry (Edinburgh, 1998), London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes 273 (ed.Davies, E.B. and Safarov, Yu., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999) 95139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Ashbaugh, M.S. and Benguria, R.D., ‘Proof of the Payne—Pólya—Weinberger conjecture’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (1991) 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Ashbaugh, M.S. and Benguria, R.D., ‘Isoperimetric bound for the membrane problem’, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991) 333341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Ashbaugh, M.S. and Benguria, R.D., ‘A sharp for the ratio of the first two eigenvalues of Dirichlet Laplacian and extensions’, Ann. of Math. 135 (1992) 601628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Ashbaugh, M.S. and Benguria, R.D., ‘Isoperimetric bounds for higher eigenvalue ratios for the n-dimensional fixed membrane problem’, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh 123A (1993) 977985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Ashbaugh, M.S. and Benguria, R.D., ’The range of values of and for the fixed membrane problem, Rev. Math. Phys. 6 (1994) 9991009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Ashbaugh, M.S. and Benguria, R.D., ‘Bounds for ratios of first, second and third membrane eigenvalues’, Nonlinear problems in applied mathematics: in honor of Ivor Stakgold on his seventieth birthday (ed.Angell, T.S., Cook, L.P., Kleinmann, R.E., and Olmstead, W.E., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1996) 3042.Google Scholar
8Comsol AB, ‘Femlab 2.0 User's Guide and Introduction’, Comsol AB, 2000; see also http://www.femlab.com.Google Scholar
9Haeberly, J.-P., ‘On shape optimizing the ratio of the first two eigenvalues of the Laplacian’, Computer Science Technical Report, 586 Courant Institute, New York University, 1991.Google Scholar
10Haeberly, J.-P. and Overton, M.L., ‘A hybrid algorithm for optimizing eigenvalues of symmetric definite pencils’, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 15 (1994) 11411156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Harrell, E.M. II and Stubbe, J., ‘On trace identities and universal eigenvalue estimates for some partial differential operators’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997) 20372055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Hile, G.N. and , M.H. Protter, ‘Inequalities for eigenvalues of the Laplacian’, Indiana Univ.Math.J. 29 (1980) 523538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Hoffmann-Ostenhof, M., Hoffmann-Ostenhof, T. and , N. Nadirashvili, ‘The nodal line of the second eigenfunction of the Laplacian in can be closed’, Duke Math. J. 90 (1997) 631640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Levitin, M. and Parnovski, L., ‘Commutators, spectral trace identities, and universal estimates for eigenvalues’, J. Funct. Anal. 192 (2002) 425–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15MathWorks, INC., ‘Partial Differential Equation Toolbox user's guide’, The MathWorks, Inc., 1995; see also http://www.mathworks.com.Google Scholar
16Payne, L.E., Pólya, G. and Weinberger, H.F., ‘On the ratio of consecutive eigenvalues’, J. Math. Phys. 35 (1956) 289298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Rellich, F., Perturbation theory of eigenvalue problems (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
18Sanchez-Hubert, J. and Sanchez-Palencia, E., Vibration and coupling of continuous systems - asymptotics methods (Springer, Berlin, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Yang, Hong Cang ‘An estimate of the difference between consecutive eigenvalues’, preprint IC/91/60 of the Intl. Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, 1991; revised preprint, Academia Sincia, 1995.Google Scholar