Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:27:29.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Judicial Competence and Judicial Remedies in the Avena Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2005

Abstract

The last decade marked the unprecedented increase in the importance of the role of judicial bodies in the maintenance of international legal order and their assumption of hitherto unprecedented judicial powers. The principle of consent and its implications are the issues that pose major questions on possible limitations in this process. The tension between these conflicting factors has been witnessed in the treatment by the ICJ of the disputes related to the right of convicted foreign nationals to consular notification. In LaGrand, the Court made substantial advances in terms of diminishing the role of the principle of consent as an obstacle to proper judicial enforcement of international obligations. Avena – a similar case – demonstrates that such an approach has acquired an important degree of consistency in the ICJ's jurisprudence.

Type
HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS: International Court of Justice
Copyright
© 2005 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)