Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Introduction: Common Civility – International Criminal Law as Cultural Hybrid

  • ELIES VAN SLIEDREGT

Extract

On 28 and 29 October 2011, a conference was held in The Hague on International Criminal Law (ICL) as a cultural and legal hybrid. The aim of the conference convenors was to facilitate an exchange of thoughts between legal scholars, practitioners, and social scientists on the nature of ICL and to discuss the role (legal) culture plays in international criminal justice. The recent discussion is dominated by the adversarial (common law)–inquisitorial (civil law) dichotomy and centres on the hybrid nature of the procedure in international criminal law. The debate focuses on how a fair and efficient trial can be safeguarded by observing the rights of the accused and other participants through an operational criminal procedure. Sometimes, this clash of legal systems has become an end in itself, resulting in a debate on which system is superior. At least in theory, however, modern international criminal procedural law seems to have overcome the adversarial–inquisitorial dichotomy, since it combines features of both common- and civil-law systems. This unique compromise structure poses a challenge to the practitioners who – although trained in and influenced by their respective national systems – have to apply the procedural norms at the international level and, in doing so, find an appropriate balance between adversarial and inquisitorial features. This is even more challenging since the single elements of the different legal traditions do not fit together seamlessly, leading to myriad, heated disagreements over how to combine them into a single, coherent, workable legal system.

Copyright

References

Hide All

1 See, e.g., J. Jackson, Finding the Best Epistemic Fit for International Tribunals, (2009) 7 JICJ 17; C. Kress, The Procedural Law of the International Criminal Court in Outline: Anatomy of a Unique Compromise, (2003) 1 JICJ 603; Dixon, R., ‘Developing Rules of Evidence for the Yugoslav and Rwandan Tribunals’, (1997) 7 Transitional Law & Contemporary Problems 81, all with further references.

2 K. Ambos, The Structure of International Procedure: ‘Adversarial’, ‘Inquisitorial’ or Mixed, in M. Bohlander (ed.), International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of Institutions and Procedures (2007), 429.

* Professor, Faculty of Law, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; senior editor of this journal [].

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Leiden Journal of International Law
  • ISSN: 0922-1565
  • EISSN: 1478-9698
  • URL: /core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed