The following corrections have been made to the article “The Hague Evidence Convention: Practice in the Netherlands”, written by E.P.A. Keyzer and M.T. Nijhuis (attorneys-at-law, Loeff & Van der Ploeg, Advocaten en Notarissen) and appearing in the last issue of the Leiden Journal of International Law (Vol. 2, No. 2, 1989).

On page 162 of that issue two unrelated notes were put together (the two judgments of the Dutch Supreme Court have no bearing with the article of P. Herdenberger).

On page 164, the second phrase (“Risks for Dutch parties in case they do not comply with dicovery orders”) should have been used to mark a new sub-paragraph and is not a phrase which fits within the article.

On page 165, in sub-paragraph 4.3. the words “from the Communities” were mistakenly added to the phrase “In 1983 the N.V. Philips Gloeilampenfabriek (hereinafter ‘Philips’) in Eindhoven requested an exemption”. This addition did not appear in the original text and does not enhance the meaning of the text.

We regret any inconvenience to our readers and extend our sincerest apologies.

The Editorial Staff