Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T00:23:30.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Criminal Procedure by J. Hatchard, B. Huber and R. Vogler, Comparative Law Series, BIICL 1996, xiv + 256 pp (hardback £29.50)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Sybil Sharpe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 235 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Van Den Wyngaert (ed) Criminal procedure systems in the European Community (1993).

2. Fennell, P (et al eds) Criminal Justice in Europe (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

3. See Ashworth, A The Criminal Process: An Evaluative Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995) and Sanders, and Young, R Criminal Justice (London: Butterworths, 1994)Google Scholar.

4. Leigh, L H and Zedner, L A Report on the administration of criminal justice in France and Germany Research Study No 1 to RCCJ (London: HMSO, 1993)Google Scholar.

5. McConville, M, Sanders, A and Leng, R The Case for the Prosecution (London: Routledge, 1991) p 36 Google Scholar.

6. See National Crime Facility Investigative Interviewing A Practical Guide (1996).

7. Eg J R Spencer ‘The Neutral Expert: an implausible Bogey’ [1991] Crim LJ 106.

8. Klass v Federal Republic of Germany (1978) 2 EHRR 214 but cp Niemitz v Germany (1992) 16 EHRR 97.

9. See Lord Rodgers at Committee State Stage, Hansard vol 576, col 217.

10. Environmental Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 11 ALR 392 at 404–405.

11. See S Sharpe ‘Disclosure in Criminal cases’ (1996) 62 Criminal Lawyer 5.