Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T17:07:27.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidemiology and Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

John M. Last
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states or events in specified populations, and the application of this study to control of health problems.

Several terms used in this definition require discussion. “Study” encompasses (a) observations in public health practice, e.g. to investigate outbreaks of food poisoning, identify the source of an epidemic, trace contacts of sexually transmitted diseases; (b) hypothesis-testing observational studies using cross-sectional, cohort and casecontrol methods; and (c) experiments such as randomized controlled trials, in which there is intervention as well as observation, usually with the aim of evaluating a preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic regimen or procedure. “Distribution” refers to time sequences, places of occurrence, and persons affected. “Determinants” are all the physical, biological and behavioral factors that can influence health. “Health-related states or events” include diseases, injuries, deaths, behaviors such as tobacco addiction, and reactions to preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic regimens or procedures.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 19 , Issue 3-4 , Fall Winter 1991 , pp. 166 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Last, J.M. (Ed): Dictionary of Epidemiology, Second Edition. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988; p. 42.Google Scholar
Last, J.M.: Public Health and Human Ecology. Norwalk: Appleton and Lange, 1987. pp 29–30.Google Scholar
These terms and most others used in this paper are defined in the Dictionary of Epidemiology.Google Scholar
Some writers use the term “isolation” To describe segregation of infectious cases and “quarantine” to describe segregation of apparently healthy contacts or suspected contacts of infectious conditions; others use these two terms interchangeably. The definitions given in the American Public Health Association's handbook, Control of Communicable Disease in Man, spell out several grades or categories; strict isolation and strict quarantine are the most restrictive and are used when the contagious condition is life-threatening.Google Scholar
Random allocation is often described as a process that ensures an equal chance of selection for all units in the “universe”: but under some circumstances samples are drawn at different rates from subsets of the universe—for instance, in sampling persons according to occupational group, when it may be advisable to use a 1 in 10 sample from a small occupational group but a 1 in 100 sample from a large occupational group. Hence it is more precise to refer to a “known” than to an “equal” chance of selection.Google Scholar
For discussion of the strengths and weaknesses, see for example Kelsey, J.L. Thompson, W.D. Evans, A.S.: Methods in Observational Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986; and Schlesselman, J.J.: Case-Control Studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982. The strengths and limitations have been exhaustively discussed also in many biomedical journals. There has been little discussion of ethical aspects, as the method is considered not to present serious ethical problems other than the intrusion on personal privacy required when patients are asked to answer questions or submit to laboratory tests, etc.Google Scholar
Newcombe, H.B.: Handbook of Record Linkage. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1988.Google Scholar
Westrin, C.G.: Personal communication, 1989.Google Scholar
Acheson, D.E. Barnes, H.R. Gardner, M.J. et al: “Formaldehyde in the British Chemical Industry: An Occupational Cohort Study”. Lancet, 1984, 1:611–616; Smith, M.E. Newcombe, H.B.: “Use of the Canadian Mortality Data Base for Epidemiological Follow Up”. Can J Public Health, 1982, 73:39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordis, L. Gold, E. Seltser, R.: “Privacy and Protection in Epidemiologic and Medical Research: Challenge and Responsibility”. Am J Epidemiol, 1977, 105:163–168; Sartwell, P.E. Last, J.M.: “Epidemiology and Health Information”, in Last, J.M. (Ed) Maxcy-Rosenau Public Health and Preventive Medicine 11th Edition. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1980; pp 31–32.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. Hill, A.B. Topley, W.W.C. Wilson, J.: Experimental Epidemiology. London: The Privy Council, the Medical Research Council. His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1936.Google Scholar
The use of the word “control” with two different meanings can confuse the uninitiated. In a case-control study, there is no intervention, only observation; in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) the controls, like the cases, are subjected to some intervention, and there may be some risks involved. This is why informed consent is mandatory in RCTs. The phrase used in French, le groupe temoin (literally the “witness group”) conveys rather better than the English the distinction between study and control groups but does not address this difference in risk experienced by controls in case-control studies and RCTs.Google Scholar
Arnold, F.A. Dean, H.T. Knutson, J.W.: “Effect of Fluoridated Water Supplies on Dental Caries Prevalence; Seventh Year of the Grand Rapids-Muskegan Study”. Pub Health Rep, 1953, 68:141–151.Google Scholar
Watt, J. Lindsay, D.R.: “Diarrheal Disease Control Studies, I; Effect of Fly Control in a High Morbidity Area”. Pub Health Rep, 1948, 63:1319–1325.Google Scholar
Farquhar, J.W. Maccoby, N. Wood, P.D. et al: Community education for cardiovascular health. Lancet, 1977, 1:1192–1195Google ScholarPubMed
See Screening in Medical Care: Reviewing the Evidence a collection of essays published for the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust. London: Oxford University Press, 1968; see also Wilson, J.M.G. Jungner, G.: The Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva: WHO Public Health Papers, No. 34, 1968. The underlying theory is discussed in many textbooks of epidemiology. See for example, Mausner, J. Kramer, S.: Epidemiology: An Introductory Text. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985, pp 214-238.Google Scholar
There are innumerable publications on health service evaluation. A good starting-point may be Rundall, T.G.: “Evaluation of Health Service Programs,” in Last, J.M.(Ed): Maxcy-Rosenau Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 12th Edition. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1986; pp 1831-1847; a revision has been published in the 13th edition, pp. 1079-94.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, W.J. Davis, M.E. Rynkiewicz, L.M. Pottinger, R.E.: “Does the Administration of Diethylstilbestrol during Pregnancy Have Therapeutic Value?” Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1953, 66:1062–1068.Google Scholar
Herbst, A.L. Ulfelder, H. Poskanzer, D.C.: “Adenocarcinoma of the Vagina: Association of Maternal Stilbestrol Therapy with Tumor Appearance in Young Women”. New Engl J Med, 1971, 284:878–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See also Orenberg C.L.: DES: The Complete Story. New York: St Martin's Press, 1981.Google Scholar
See for example, J.M. Last: “Hazards of Health Care,” Chapter 9 in J.M. Last, Public Health and Human Ecology, Norwalk, Appleton and Lange, 1987, for a discussion of this and other examples.Google Scholar
Chemical Manufacturers Association: Draft Code of Good Epidemiological Practices. Washington DC: May 1990. See also Epidemiology Monitor, Volume 11 Number Four, April 1990. The subject was discussed at a special session convened by the Industrial Epidemiology Forum, Snowbird, Utah, in June 1990.Google Scholar
Last, J.M.: “Epidemiologists’ Responsibilities to Research Subjects”. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991, 90:95S-101S; See also Last, J.M.: “An Ethical Framework for Epidemiology”, in Allebeck, P. Jansson, B. (Eds): Ethics in Medicine. New York: Raven Press, 1990; pp 125-135. See also Last, J.M.: “Moral Obligations of Epidemiologists” (Wade Hampton Frost Memorial Lecture, 1989). See also Last, J.M.: “Natural and Social History of Epidemics”, in AIDS: A perspective for Canadians (Background papers); Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada, 1988; pp 9-14. See also Last, J.M.: “Ethics and Public Health Policy”, Chapter 76 in Last, J.M. Wallace, R.B. (Eds), Maxcy-Rosenau Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 13th Edition, Norwalk, Ct, Appleton and Lange, 1991.Google Scholar
See for example the Ontario Ministry of Health's Report on Testing and Reporting for AIDS and HIV Infection. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1989. There are many similar sets of guidelines, mostly agreeing on the need for great circumspection in counseling partners of persons found to have HIV infection.Google Scholar
Guidelines for Monitoring HIV Infection in Populations. World Health Organization/Global Programme on AIDS. Geneva: WHO, September 1989.Google Scholar
Duckett, M. Orkin, A.J.: “AIDS-Related Migration and Travel Policies and Restrictions: A Global Survey”. AIDS, 1989, 3:(Suppl)S231–252. More than 30 nations, including the USA and the UK, restrict entry of persons infected with HIV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki, adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and amended by the 29th World Medical Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 1975, the 35th World Medical Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983, and the 41st World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong, September 1989.Google Scholar
CIOMS, Geneva, 1982.Google Scholar
For example, the Canadian Mortality Atlases identified a particular town as the “unhealthiest” in the nation. The dismayed citizens requested a special study, which partially defused their feelings by demonstrating that at least some of the deaths attributed to this town were of residents from other places who died in long-term care facilities located in the town.Google Scholar
Silverman, W.A.: Retrolental Fibroplasia: A Modern Parable. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1980.Google Scholar
Oakley, A.: “Who's Afraid of the Randomized Controlled Trial? Some Dilemmas of the Scientific Method and ‘Good’ Research Practice”. Women and Health, 1989, 15:25–59.Google Scholar
A Code of Ethics for Epidemiologists. Draft distributed at the Industrial Epidemiology Forum's symposium on ethics in epidemiology, Birmingham, Alabama June 1989.Google Scholar
Haynes, R.B. Sackett, D.L. Taylor, D.W. et al: “Increased Absenteeism from Work after Detection and Labeling of Hypertensive Patients”. N Engl J Med, 1978, 299:741–747.Google Scholar
This work was published in many papers carrying my name in the period from 1963 to 1968; most of the papers appeared in Lancet, British Medical Journal, Medical Care (old series) and British Journal of Medical Education. The entire body of work formed the basis for a thesis for the academic degree M.D.; the thesis, lodged at the University of Adelaide, contains some details, but not identities or even nations in which the worrisome episodes occurred.Google Scholar
The problems of scientific honesty, fraud, plagiarism, etc, have been discussed at conferences convened by the Council of Biology Editors and the National Academy of Sciences. See JAMA, 1990, 263:1317–1441 for a series of papers from the First International Conference on Peer Review in Scientific Publication.Google Scholar
It was the theme of a two-day conference convened by the Industrial Epidemiology Forum in June 1989; the proceedings of this conference are published in J Clin Epidemiol, 1990.Google Scholar
Angell, M.: “Ethical Imperialism? Ethics in International Collaborative Clinical Research”. N Engl J Med, 1988, 319:1081–1083; See also Barry, M.: “Ethical Considerations of Human Investigation in Developing Countries: The AIDS Dilemma”. N Engl J Med, 1988, 319:1083-1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code of Community Health Rights. Rev Inst Med Trop San Paolo, 1986, 28:278.Google Scholar
Gajdusek, D.C. Zigas, V.: “Degenerative Disease of the Central Nervous System in New Guinea”. N Engl J Med, 1957, 257:974–978.Google Scholar
Draft guidelines for the IEA, see Last, J.M.: “Guidelines on Ethics for Epidemiologists”. Int J Epidemiol, 1990, 19:226–229; other draft guidelines have been produced by the Society for Epidemiologic Research, the Australian Epidemiological Association, the Swedish Association of Public Health Research Workers, and for the Industrial Epidemiology Forum [Ref #31, above]. Research granting agencies, e.g. the National Health and Medical Research Council in Australia, have also produced guidelines.Google Scholar
Colin Soskolne may be the leading proponent of the school of thought that seeks to make epidemiology a profession in its own right; his views appear in articles such as “Epidemiology: Questions of Science, Ethics, Morality and Law”. [Am J Epidemiol, 1989, 129:1–18]. While there is no quarrel with this view, many public health workers, especially in developing countries, consider that epidemiology can and indeed must be practised by primary care workers who lack formal professional training. The CIOMS Guidelines (and probably those of the IEA) should reach this constituency, leaving more formally constructed guidelines to such bodies as the American College of Epidemiology.Google Scholar
Fraser, D.W.: “Epidemiology as a Liberal Art”. N Engl J Med, 1987, 316:309–314.Google Scholar