Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T19:57:57.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vaccine Court: The Law and Politics of Injury. By Anna Kirkland. New York City: NYU Press, 2016. 288 pp. $40.00 hardcover

Review products

Vaccine Court: The Law and Politics of Injury. By Anna Kirkland. New York City: NYU Press, 2016. 288 pp. $40.00 hardcover

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Dorit Reiss
Dorit Reiss*
Affiliation:
University of California Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, CA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 370 - 371
Copyright
© 2021 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, Jeb, and Burke, Thomas F. 2015. How Policy Shapes Politics: Rights, Courts, Litigation, and the Struggle over Injury Compensation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kata, Anna. 2012. “Anti-Vaccine Activists, Web 2.0, and the Postmodern Paradigm-An Overview of Tactics and Tropes Used Online by the Anti-Vaccination Movement.” Vaccine 30: 3778-89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lillvis, Denise F., Kirkland, Anna, and Frick, Anna. 2014. “Power and Persuasion in the Vaccine Debates: An Analysis of Political Efforts and Outcomes in the United States, 1998–2012.” Milbank Quarterly 92(3): 475–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Institute for Autism Science et al. v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 19-cv-11947-LJL (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2020).Google Scholar