Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Stern, Nat S.
2007.
The Looming Collapse of Restrictions on Judicial Campaign Speech.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Hume, Robert J.
2007.
Administrative Appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court: The Importance of Legal Signals.
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 3,
p.
625.
Hume, Robert J.
2009.
The Impact of Judicial Opinion Language on the Transmission of Federal Circuit Court Precedents.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
127.
Wedeking, Justin
2009.
Cognition, Motivation, and Supreme Court Decision Making.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Hume, Robert J.
2010.
Strategic-Instrument Theory and the Use of Non-Authoritative Sources by Federal Judges: Explaining References to Law Review Articles.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
291.
Lupu, Yonatan
and
Fowler, James H.
2011.
Strategic Citations to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Farganis, Dion
2012.
Do Reasons Matter? The Impact of Opinion Content on Supreme Court Legitimacy.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 1,
p.
206.
Lupu, Yonatan
and
Voeten, Erik
2012.
Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights.
British Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 2,
p.
413.
Corley, Pamela C.
and
Wedeking, Justin
2014.
The (Dis)Advantage of Certainty: The Importance of Certainty in Language.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 1,
p.
35.
Wedeking, Justin
and
Zilis, Michael
2015.
The Use of Disagreeable Language in Supreme Court Opinions.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Hsiang, Jerome
and
Nyarko, Julian
2015.
Precedent Citation at the WTO - Shifting the Empirical Focus to Panelists.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Larsson, Olof
Naurin, Daniel
Derlén, Mattias
and
Lindholm, Johan
2017.
Speaking Law to Power: The Strategic Use of Precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 7,
p.
879.
Krewson, Christopher N.
2019.
Strategic Sensationalism: Why Justices Use Emotional Appeals in Supreme Court Opinions.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 4,
p.
319.
Busch, Marc L
and
Pelc, Krzysztof J
2019.
Words Matter: How WTO Rulings Handle Controversy.
International Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 3,
p.
464.
Naurin, Daniel
and
Stiansen, Øyvind
2020.
The Dilemma of Dissent: Split Judicial Decisions and Compliance With Judgments From the International Human Rights Judiciary.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 6,
p.
959.
Zilis, Michael
and
Wedeking, Justin
2020.
The Sources and Consequences of Political Rhetoric.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
203.
Owens, B. Robert
and
Merriman, Ben
2021.
“Habit and creativity in judges’ definition and framing of legal questions”.
Theory and Society,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 5,
p.
741.
Hall, Matthew E. K.
Hollibaugh, Gary E.
Klingler, Jonathan D.
and
Ramey, Adam J.
2021.
Attributes beyond Attitudes: Personality Traits on the US Supreme Court.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,
p.
345.
Stiansen, Øyvind
2021.
Directing Compliance? Remedial Approach and Compliance with European Court of Human Rights Judgments.
British Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 2,
p.
899.
Stobb, Maureen
2021.
The Costs of Going Global.
Journal of Law and Courts,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,
p.
215.