Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T20:33:12.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The University, the Arrested Student, and Bail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Harry W. Pettigrew
Harry W. Pettigrew*
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The argument of this article is that where a transient college student is arrested, financial bail is seldom necessary to assure the defendant's presence in court. However, in such a case, financial bail is almost always required by the court, since in the area of bail, as with other criminal law problems, the pragmatic exigencies of the traditional American criminal law system place a heavy burden on any transient to realize the same protections, privileges, and rights provided the indigenous population (Foote, 1965: 1129-1130).

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , May 1971 , pp. 563 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cases

COLEMAN v. STATE OF ALABAMA 399 U.S. 1 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ERIE R. R. v. TOMPKINS 304 U.S. 64 (1933).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

ARES, C. E., A., RANKIN, and H., STURZ (1963) “The Manhattan bail project: an interim report on the use of pre-trial parole.” New York Univ. Law Rev. 38 (January): 67–95.Google Scholar
BARON, R. (1965) “Workshop: establishing bail projects.” Univ. of Illinois Law Forum 1965 (Spring): 4245.Google Scholar
CAZIER, S. (1970) “Student power and in loco parentis,” Pp. 506–530 in Foster, J. and Long, D. (eds.) Protest: Student Activism in America. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
FOOTE, C. (1965) “The coming constitutional crisis in bail.” Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 113 (May): 959-999; (June): 1125–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MONEYPENNY, P. (1967) “University purpose, discipline and due process.” North Dakota Law Rev. 43 (Summer): 739–752.Google Scholar
Ohio State Law J. [Note] (1968) “Symposium-uncertainty in college disciplinary regulations.” 29 (Fall): 1023–1037.Google Scholar
PAULSEN, M. G. (1966) “Pre-trial release in the United States.” Columbia Law Rev. 66 (January): 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEAVEY, W. A. (1957) “Dismissal of students: due process.” Harvard Law Rev. 70 (June): 1406–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STRAHAN, R. D. (1967) “Should colleges release grades of college students to draft boards?” North Dakota Law Rev. 43 (Summer): 721–737.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, C. A. (1970) Handbook of the Law of Federal Courts. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar