Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T17:19:08.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

To Confront or Not to Confront: Measuring Claiming Rates in Discrimination Grievances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Abstract

This note reexamines the generally accepted belief that persons with discrimination-related grievances are much less likely to complain about their problem than are persons with grievances arising from consumer purchases, torts, or other common kinds of personal problems. We find that previously reported analyses greatly overstate the gap between complaining in discrimination problems and other kinds of problems. Drawing on data from three surveys, each conducted in a different country (the United States, Canada, and Australia), we find that for some types of discrimination problems the level of complaining in fact equals or exceeds complaining in other arenas.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This note is drawn from a paper prepared for presentation at meetings of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia, 8–10 November 1990. The analysis was supported by grants from the Canadian Studies Grant Program and from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. SES-8722540). The U.S. data were collected with support from the U.S. Department of Justice (Contract No. JAOIA-79-C-0040). The Ontario data were collected with support from the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. Neither the suppliers nor the original collectors of the data bear any responsibility for the analyses and interpretations reported herein.

References

ASH, S. (1980) “Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behaviour: Major Findings and Directions for Action.” Ottawa: Consumer Research and Evaluation Branch, Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada.Google Scholar
BAUM, Lawrence (1990) American Courts: Process and Policy. 2d ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
BOGART, W. A., and Neil, VIDMAR (1990) “Problems and Experience with the Ontario Civil Justice System: An Empirical Assessment,” in Hutchinson, A. (ed.), Access to Justice: Bridges and Barriers. Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
BUMILLER, Kristin (1988) The Civil Rights Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
CROWE, Patricia Ward (1978) “Complainant Reactions to the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination,” 12 Law & Society Review 217.Google Scholar
CURRAN, Barbara A. (1977) The Legal Needs of the Public: The Final Report of a National Survey. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
DONOHUE, John J. III, and Peter, SIEGELMAN (1991) “The Changing Nature of Employment Discrimination Litigation,” 43 Stanford Law Review 983.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F. (1974) “Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing,” 9 Law & Society Review 63.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F. (1975) “Avoidance as Dispute Processing: An Elaboration,” 9 Law & Society Review 695.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L. F., ABEL, Richard L., and Austin, SARAT (1980–81) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …,” 15 Law & Society Review 631.Google Scholar
FITZGERALD, Jeffrey (1983) “Grievances, Disputes & Outcomes: A Comparison of Australia and the United States,” 1 Law in Context 15.Google Scholar
HIRSCHMAN, Albert O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
KRITZER, Herbert M. (1980–81) “Studying Disputes: Learning from the CLRP Experience,” 15 Law & Society Review 503.Google Scholar
KRITZER, Herbert M. (1991) “Propensity to Sue in England and the United States: Blaming and Claiming in Tort Cases,” 18 Journal of Law & Society 452.Google Scholar
KRITZER, Herbert M., W. A., BOGART, and Neil, VIDMAR (1991) “The Aftermath of Injury: Cultural Factors in Compensation Seeking in Canada and the United States,” 25 Law & Society Review 499.Google Scholar
KRITZER, Herbert M., Neil, VIDMAR, and W. A., BOGART (1990) “The Genesis of Discrimination Litigation: Comparing Canada and the United States.” Presented at 1990 meeting of Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, 8–10 Nov.Google Scholar
KRITZER, Herbert M., VIDMAR, Neil, BOGART, W. A., and Kathleen, ZAHORIK (1991) “Legal Mobilization in Canada and the United States: Consumer Problems in North America.” Presented at 1991 meeting of Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 18–20 April.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 59.Google Scholar
MILLER, Richard E., and Austin, SARAT (1980–81) “Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture,” 15 Law & Society Review 525.Google Scholar
SAMBORN, Randall (1990) “Many Americans Find Bias at Work,” National Law Journal, 16 July, p. 1.Google Scholar
SCHULLER, Regina A., and Neil, VIDMAR (1987) “An Empirical Investigation of Consumer Problems and Responses: Implications for Future Policy and Research.” Unpublished, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil (1981) “Justice Motives and Other Psychological Factors in the Development and Resolution of Disputes,” in Lerner, M. J. and Lerner, S. C. (eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil (1988) “Seeking Justice: An Empirical Map of Consumer Problems and Consumer Responses in Canada,” 26 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 757.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil, and Regina, SCHULLER (1987) “Individual Differences and the Pursuit of Legal Rights: A Preliminary Inquiry,” 11 Law and Human Behavior 299.Google Scholar
ZAHORIK, Kathleen M. (1990) “Consumer Problems in Three Countries.” Prepared for delivery at 1990 meetings of Law and Society Association, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar