Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T02:47:39.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure of American Legal Institutions and the Diffusion of Wrongful-Discharge Laws, 1978–1999

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Robert C. Bird  and
Donald J. Smythe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article evaluates how the social structure of American legal institutions influenced the diffusion of wrongful-discharge laws over the period 1978–1999, and it assesses whether economic or political variables influenced the diffusion process. The results are surprising and quite striking. Precedents by other courts within the same federal circuit region were generally more influential in the diffusion process than precedents by courts in neighboring states or by courts within the same census or West legal reporting region, even though the precedents were on matters of state law rather than federal law and the decisions were usually made by state courts rather than federal courts. There is some limited evidence that political variables may also have been a factor, but economic variables were not statistically significant, even though the new employment laws may have had important economic consequences.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 833 - 864
Copyright
© 2008 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are much indebted to the editor of this journal, an editorial board member, and three anonymous referees for many thoughtful comments and suggestions. Our thanks also to the participants in the discussion group on empirical legal studies at the AALS Conference on Commercial Law at the Crossroads in Montreal, 2005; as well as the participants in the Panel on the Structure and Performance of Legal Institutions at the ISNIE Annual Conference in Boulder, 2006; and the participants in the Panel on Legal Process at the Canadian Law and Economics Association Annual Meetings in Toronto, 2006, for many helpful comments. Our thanks to Gerald Wright for help with the political variables and to Tyler Morgan for his diligent research assistance. Of course, we alone are responsible for any remaining errors or omissions.

References

References

Ahuja, Gautam (2000) “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study,” 45 Administrative Science Q. 425–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Paul D. (1982) “Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories,” 13 Sociological Methodology 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual Judicial Conference: Second Judicial Circuit of the United States (1987) 115 F.R.D. 349. Proceeding, in Federal Rules Decisions reporter, West Publishing.Google Scholar
Armatas, Andrew S. (2002) “The Colorado Judicial Coordinating Council Works to Improve the Judiciary,” 31 Colorado Lawyer 37.Google Scholar
Autor, David H., et al. (2004) “The Employment Consequences of Wrongful-Discharge Laws: Large, Small, or None at All?,” 94 American Economic Rev. Papers and Proceedings 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, David H. (2006) “The Costs of Wrongful Discharge Laws,” 88 Rev. Economics & Statistics 211–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S., & Murphy, Kevin M. (2000) Social Economics. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Robert C., & Knopf, John D. (forthcoming) “Do Wrongful Discharge Laws Impair Firm Performance?,” Journal of Law and Economics.Google Scholar
Blades, Lawrence E. (1967) “Employment-at-will vs. Individual Freedom: On Limiting the Abusive Exercise of Employer Power,” 67 Columbia Law Rev. 1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., & Witmer, Richard (2004) “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion,” 57 Political Research Q. 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. (1980) “Models of Network Structure,” 6 Annual Rev. of Sociology 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. (1985) “The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts,” 79 American Political Science Rev. 178–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., & Baum, Lawrence (1981) “Patterns of Adopting of Tort Law Innovations: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines,” 75 American Political Science Rev. 975–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carp, Robert A. (1972) “The Scope and Function of Intra-Circuit Judicial Communication: A Case Study of the Eighth Circuit,” 6 Law & Society Rev. 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Morris L., & Olson, Kent C. (1996) Legal Research in a Nutshell. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
Dertouzos, James N., & Karoly, Lynn A. (1992) Labor Market Responses to Employer Liability. Santa Monica: The Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (1990) “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace,” 95 American J. of Sociology 1401–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., & Suchman, Mark C. (1999) “When the ‘Haves’ Hold Court: Speculations on the Organizational Internalization of Law,” 33 Law & Society Rev. 941–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., et al. (1992) “Professional Construction of Law: The Inflated Threat of Wrongful-Discharge,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. (1984) American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., et al. (2006) “Public Opinion in States: A Quarter Century of Change and Stability,” in Cohen, J., ed., Public Opinion in State Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fishback, Price V., & Kantor, Shawn Everett (1998) “The Adoption of Workers' Compensation in the United States, 1900–1930,” 61 J. Law & Economics 305–42.Google Scholar
Galaskiewicz, Joseph, & Wasserman, Stanley (1981) “A Dynamic Study of Change in a Regional Corporate Network,” 46 American Sociological Rev. 475–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goes, James B., & Park, Seung Ho (1997) “Interorganizational Links and Innovation: The Case of Hospital Services,” 40 Academy of Management J. 673–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Barry T., et al. (2001) “Estimates of Union Density by State,” 124 Monthly Labor Rev. 51–55.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Stephen P. (1995) “Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-Time Duration Models,” 57 Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Alan B. (1991) “The Evolution of Unjust-Dismissal Legislation in the United States,” 44 Industrial and Labor Relations Rev. 644–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Paul G. (2003) “The Origins of the Blue-Sky Laws: A Test of Competing Hypotheses,” 46 J. Law & Economics 229–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Thomas J. (2000) “Common Law Exceptions to Employment at Will and U.S. Labor Markets,” 16 J. Law, Economics, and Organization 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. (2001) “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion,” 54 Political Research Q. 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morriss, Andrew P. (1994) “Exploding Myths: An Empirical and Economic Reassessment of the Rise of Employment At-Will,” 59 Missouri Law Rev. 679–773.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Rohrschneider, Robert, & Dalton, Russell J. (2002) “A Global Network? Transnational Cooperation among Environmental Groups,” 64 J. of Politics 510–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaughnessy, Timothy M. (2003) “How State Exceptions to Employment-at-Will Affect Wages,” 24 J. of Labor Research 447–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisk, Gregory C., et al. (1998) “Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning,” 73 New York University Law Rev. 1377.Google Scholar
Stidham, Ronald, & Carp, Robert A. (1988) “Exploring Regionalism in the Federal District Circuits,” 18 Publius 113–25.Google Scholar
Strang, David (1990) “From Dependency to Sovereignty: An Event History Analysis of Decolonization, 1870–1987,” 55 American Sociological Rev. 846–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symposium (2005) “The Use of Legislative History in Interpreting New York State and Federal Statutes,” 68 Albany Law Rev. 723. Symposium sponsored by the New York State-Federal Judicial Council.Google Scholar
U.S. Courts (2003) “Together, Federal and State Judges Find Solutions to Mutual Concerns,” 35 The Third Branch, http://www.uscourts.gov/ttb/dec03ttb/concerns/index.html.Google Scholar
Van den Bulte, Christophe, & Lilien, Gary L. (1999) “Integrating Models of Innovation Adoption: Social Network Thresholds, Utility Maximization, and Hazard Models.” Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, October.Google Scholar
Van den Bulte, Christophe, & Lilien, Gary L. (2001) “Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion Versus Marketing Effort,” 106 American J. of Sociology 1409–35.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. (1969) “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States,” 63 American Political Science Rev. 880–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, David J. (1997) “On the Meaning and Pattern of Legal Citations: Evidence from State Wrongful Discharge Precedent Cases,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, David J., & Schwarz, Joshua L. (1996) “State Common Law Wrongful Discharge Doctrines: Up-Date, Refinement, and Rationales,” 33 American Business Law J. 645–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Hutton v. Watters, 179 S.W. 134 (Tenn. 1915).Google Scholar
Payne v. Western & Atl. R.R., 81 Tenn. 507, 518 (1884).Google Scholar
Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 344 P.2d 27 (Cal. Ct. App. 1959).Google Scholar