Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T01:44:03.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Shared History: Unknotting Fictive Kinship and Legal Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Marie-Andrée Jacob
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article looks in detail at a form of kinship that is contingently crafted and mobilized to achieve specific purposes. On the basis of ethnographic material collected among local actors within bodies that regulate kidney transplants in Israel, the objective of this article is to expand the sociolegal definition of fictive kinship. I use transplant relatedness to refer to the set of formal and informal norms that grow out of social and medico-legal practices in the field of kidney donations and sales; however, the form of fictive kinship that appears in this specific field tells us something broader about kinship as it is constructed and performed in legal processes more generally. The configuration of fictive kinship that is examined is the shared history (historia meshoutefet). I argue that in the present case, the shared history alters social and legal deep-seated understandings of kinship and ultimately makes the distinctions between allegedly real and pseudo-kinship collapse.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 95 - 126
Copyright
© 2009 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to all my informants for their time and generosity. Because of the sensitivity of the issues discussed in this article, I cannot thank them personally here. For thoughtful comments on earlier versions of this article, I thank Annelise Riles, Michael Lynch, Martha Fineman, Leticia Barrera, Eyal Ben-Ari, Rosie Harding, Tsachi Keren-Paz, Ann Kelly, Shai Lavi, Amy Levine, Julie McCandless, Zvi Triger, and the four LSR anonymous reviewers. I also thank the editor of LSR, Carroll Seron, for her astute guidance, as well as Danielle McClellan and Evelyn Rubak from LSR. The research reported in this article has received approvals from offices of protection of human subjects in Israel and the United States. For financial support I thank the Lady Davis Fellowship Trust, the Gender, Sexuality and the Family Fund at Cornell University and Emory University, and Cornell Law School.

References

References

Al-Haj, Majid (1995) “Kinship and Modernization in Developing Societies: The Emergence of Instrumentalized Kinship,” 26 J. of Comparative Family Studies 311–28.Google Scholar
Axel, Brian Keith (2004) “The Context of Diaspora,” 19 Cultural Anthropology 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Nicola (2008) “Not the Marrying Kind: Feminist Critiques of Marriage and Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships.” Ph.D. diss., School of Law, University of Keele, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Berger, Bennett M. (1981) The Survival of Counterculture: Ideological Work and Everyday Life among Rural Communards. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna (1999) “Inter-Generational Relations among Upper Middle-Class Jewish Families in Israel,” 41 The Jewish J. of Sociology 24–49.Google Scholar
Borneman, John (1992) Belonging to the Two Berlins: Kin, State, Nation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith (1999) Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (2000) Antigone's Claim. Kinship Between Life and Death. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet (2004) After Kinship. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Carsten, Janet, ed. (2000) Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, David L. (1996) “What If? The Legal Consequences of Marriage and the Legal Needs of Lesbian and Gay Male Couples,” 95 Michigan Law Rev. 447–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Morgan (2007) “Closeness in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction: Debating Kinship and Biomedicine in Lebanon and the Middle East,” 80 Anthropological Q. 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Lawrence (2001) “The Other Kidney: Biopolitics Beyond Recognition,” 72 Body and Society 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Lawrence (2003) “Where It Hurts: Indian Material for an Ethics of Organ Transplantation,” 38 Zygon 663–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jeanette (2000) Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert, et al. (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, Martha (1995) The Neutered Mother: The Sexual Family and other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha (2004) The Autonomy Myth. A Theory of Dependency. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Fogiel-Bijaoui, Sylvie (2002) “Familism, Postmodernity and the State: The Case of Israel,” 21 The J. of Israeli History 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Sarah (1997) Embodied Progress, A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah (2001) “Biologization Revisited: Kinship Theory in the Context of the New Biologies,” in Franklin, S., & MacKinnon, S., eds., Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah, & MacKinnon, Susan, eds. (2001) Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Fiona (2004) “‘Relational, and Strange’: A Preliminary Foray into a Project to Queer Breastfeeding,” 19 Australian Feminist Studies 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillison, Gillian (1980) “Images of Nature in Gimi Thought,” in MacCormack, C. & Strathern, M., eds., Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Michelle (2006) Black Markets: The Supply and Demand of Body Parts. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubrium, Jaber F., & Buckholdt, David R. (1982) “Fictive Family: Everyday Usage, Analytic and Human Service Considerations,” 84 American Anthropologist 878–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdy, Sherine F. (2008) “When the State and Your Kidney Fail: Political Etiologies in an Egyptian Dialysis Ward,” 35 American Ethnologist 553–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Jennifer, et al. (2008) “Nonreproductive Technologies: Remediating Kin Structures with Donor Gametes,” 33 Science, Technology and Human Values 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. (2006) “Conceiving Children: How Documents Support Case vs. Biographical Analyses,” in Riles, A., ed., Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Stephen (2003) “Kinship in Hypertext: Transubstantiating Fatherhood and Information Flow in Artificial Life,” in Franklin, S. & MacKinnon, S., eds., Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Jonathan (2002) “Giving, Selling, Sharing Bodies,” in Bainham, A. et al., eds., Body Lore and Laws. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael (2007) “Global Kinship: Anthropology and the Politics of Knowing,” 80 Anthropological Q. 313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holstein, James A., & Gubrium, Jaber F. (1994) “Constructing Family: Descriptive Practice and Domestic Order,” in Sarbin, T. R. & Kitsuse, J. I., eds., Constructing the Social. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jacob, Marie-Andrée (2006) “The Match of Relatedness: Bureaucracy, Legitimation, and Kinship in Organ Transplants.” Doctoral thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Jacob, Marie-Andrée (2007) “Form Made Persons: Consent Forms as Consent's Blind Spot,” 30 Political and Legal Anthropology Rev. 249–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Marie-Andrée (n.d.) Discipline Exchange on Organ Swaps,” in Freeman, M., ed., Law and Anthropology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Jean-Klein, Iris (2003) “Into Committees, Out of the House? Familiar Forms in the Organization of Palestinian Committee Activism During the First Intifada,” 30 American Ethnologist 556–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Susan Martha (2000) Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Sharon R., et al. (2006) “Aged Bodies and Kinship Matters: The Ethical Field of Kidney Transplant,” 33 American Ethnologist 81–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, Karen (2002) “Organ Donation and Transplantation in India: An Inquiry in Kerala,” 11 J. of Social Distress and the Homeless 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishore, R. R. (1996) “Organ Donation: Consanguinity vs Universality—An Analysis of Indian Law,” 28 Transplant Proceedings 3603–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Latour, Bruno (2002) La fabrique du droit. Une ethnographie du Conseil d'État. Paris: La découverte.Google Scholar
Lau, Estelle T. (2006) Paper Families: Identity, Immigration Administration and Chinese Exclusion. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Edmund R. (1961) Pul Eliya, a Village in Ceylon. A Study of Land Tenure and Kinship. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Leach, James (2003) Creative Land. Place and Procreation on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea. Oxford, United Kingdom: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1949) Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, & Bogen, David (1996) The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Maurer, Bill (2005) “Due Diligence and ‘Reasonable Man’ Offshore,” 20 Cultural Anthropology 474–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Rolland (1999) “The Cultural Performance of Control,” 20 Organization Studies 619–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prainsack, Barbara, & Siegal, Gil (2006) “The Rise of Genetic Couplehood? A Comparative View of Pre-marital Genetic Testing,” 1 BioSocieties 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Adam (2006) “Documents Unfolding,” in Riles, A., ed., Documents. Artefacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise (2000) The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas (2001) “The Politics of Life Itself,” 18 Theory, Culture and Society 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, David J., et al. (1997) “The Bellagio Task Force Report on Transplantation, Bodily Integrity, and the International Traffic in Organs,” 29 Transplant Proceedings 2739–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy (2002) “Commodity Fetishism in Organ Trafficking,” in Scheper-Hughes, N. & Wacquant, L., eds., Commodifying Bodies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy (2004) “Parts Unknown: Undercover Ethnography or the Organs-Trafficking Underworld,” 5 Ethnography 29–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David (1980) American Kinship: A Cultural Account, 2d ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalev, Carmel (1998) “Halakha and Patriarchal Motherhood: An Anatomy of the New Israeli Surrogacy Law,” 32 Israel Law Rev. 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Pinhas (1981) “Marriage and Cohabitation in Israeli Law,” 16 Israel Law Rev. 439–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, James T. (1998) A New Criminal Type in Jakarta: Counter Revolution Today. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Roberta G., et al. (1987) Gift of Life: The Effect of Organ Transplantation on Individual, Family and Societal Dynamics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Society for Women's Health Research (2001) “Sex Differences in Immunology and Autoimmunity.” Proceedings from Understanding the Biology of Sex Differences Scientific Advisory Meetings, Boston, http://www.womenshealthresearch.org/site/DocServer/samboston_report.pdf?docID=309 (accessed 8 Aug. 2008).Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri (1988) “Can the Subaltern Speak?,” in Nelson, C., & Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Chicago: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (1988) The Gender of the Gift. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (1992a) After Nature, English Kinship at the End of the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (1992b) Reproducing the Future. Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (2005) Kinship, Law, and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Charis (2001) “Strategic Naturalizing: Kinship in an Infertility Clinic,” in Franklin, S. & MacKinnon, S., eds., Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Charis (2005) Making Parents. The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Triger, Zvi (2003) Remembrance of Laws Past: The Adoption of Religious Marriage and Divorce Law as a Means for Reviving the Jewish People's Lost Manliness, working paper, New York University Law School.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy (1982) The Invention of Culture, expanded ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Waldby, Catherine, & Mitchell, Robert (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Weston, Kath (2001) “Kinship, Controversy, and the Sharing of Substance: The Race/Class Politics of Blood Donation,” in Franklin, S. & MacKinnon, S., eds., Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wolstenholme, Gordon E. W., & Cameron, Margaret P., eds. (1962) Ciba Foundation Symposium on Transplantation. Boston: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, Barbara Bennett (1996) “‘It All Depends on What You Mean by Home’: Toward a Communitarian Theory of the ‘Nontraditional’ Family,” 1996 Utah Law Rev. 569–612.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (2007) “Refiguring Kinship in the Space of Adoption,” 80 Anthropological Q. 561–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara, & Coutin, Susan (2006) “Backed by Papers: Undoing Persons, Histories and Return,” 33 American Ethnologist 177–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zafran, Ruth (2008) “More Than One Mother: Determining Maternity for the Biological Child of a Female Same-Sex Couple—The Israeli View,” 9 Georgetown J. of Gender and the Law 115–64.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Brenner-Kadish v. Interior Minister, HCJ 1799/99 P.D. 54(2) 368 (1999).Google Scholar
Gadban v. State of Israel, HCJ 5785/03, P.D. 58(1) P.D. 29 (2003 Israel).Google Scholar
Nahmani v. Nahmani, CA 5587/93 P.D. 49(1) 485 (1995 Israel).Google Scholar
Yaros-Hakak v. Attorney General, CA 10280/01 P.D. 59(5) 64 (2001).Google Scholar

Statutes and Circulars Cited

Adoption of Children Law 1981, S.H. 1028 (Israel).Google Scholar
Brain Respiratory Death Law 2008, S.H. 2144 (Israel).Google Scholar
Kings' Order-in-Council 1922-1947, Drayton Laws of Palestine III, p. 2569.Google Scholar
Living Organ Transplants—Procedure Amendment 2002, Director General circular, Ministry of Health, Israel.Google Scholar
Organ Transplantation Law 2008, S.H. 2144 (Israel).Google Scholar
Rabbinical Court Jurisdiction (Marriage and Divorce) Act, 1953 S.H. 134 (Israel).Google Scholar
Surrogate Mother Agreements (Approval of the Agreement and Status of the Child) Law 1996, S.H. 1577 (Israel).Google Scholar