Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T12:18:19.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paying for the Past: Redressing the Legacy of Land Dispossession in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Bernadette Atuahene
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The constitution of South Africa mandates equitable redress for individuals and communities evicted from their properties during colonialism and apartheid. The Commission on Restitution of Land Rights' institution-wide assumption is that the financial awards given as equitable redress had no long-term economic impact on recipients because the money is gone and they are still in poverty, whereas if people had received land, the economic impact would have been lasting. Consequently, in recent years, the commission has adopted a policy of using its soft power to force claimants to choose land restitution instead of financial awards. However, the interviews I conducted with financial award recipients show that in 30 percent of the cases, the award did produce a long-term economic benefit because respondents invested in their homes. This empirical evidence suggests that the commission should rethink its recent shift in policy and not totally discount the potential of financial awards to produce a lasting economic benefit.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 955 - 989
Copyright
© 2011 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank the American Bar Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations for their generous financial assistance; the South African Land Restitution Commission for its gracious cooperation in data collection; and Traci Burch, Joseph Doherty, Cesar Rosado, and Susan Shapiro for their extremely valuable comments and criticisms.

References

Abdel-Ghany, Mohamed et al. (1983) “Windfall Income and the Permanent Income Hypothesis: New Evidence,” 17 J. of Consumer Affairs 262. 273–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette (2007) “From Reparation to Restoration: Moving Beyond Restoring Property Rights to Restoring Political and Economic Visibility,” 60 SMU Law Rev. 1419.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette (2009) “Things Fall Apart: The Illegitimacy of Property Rights in the Context of Past Theft,” 51 Arizona Law Rev. 829.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette (2010a) “Property Rights and the Demands of Transformation,” 31 Michigan J. of International Law 765.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette (2010b) “Property and Transitional Justice,” 58 UCLA Law Rev. Discourse 65. Online publication: http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1379 (accessed 1 October 2011).Google Scholar
Bennett, Tom W. (2004) Customary Law in South Africa. Lansdowne: Juta Press & Co.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, Mullainathan, Sendhil, & Shafir, Eldar (2006) “Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision Making among the Poor,” 25 J. of Public Policy and Marketing 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Roger, & Bodkin, Ronald (1965) “The National Service Life Insurance Dividend of 1950 and Consumption: A Further Test of the ‘Strict’ Permanent Income Hypothesis,” 73 J. of Political Economy 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodkin, Ronald (1959) “Windfall Income and Consumption,” 49 American Economic Rev. 602–614.Google Scholar
Bohlin, Anna (2004) “A Price on the Past: Cash as Compensation in South African Land Restitution,” 38 Canadian J. of African Studies 672–687.Google Scholar
Carroll, Christopher (1996) “On the Convaity of the Consumption Function,” 64 Econometrica: J. of the Econometric Society 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Christopher (2001) “A Theory of the Consumption Function, with and without Liquidity Constraints,” 15 J. of Economic Perspectives 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission on Restitution of Land Rights Annual Report (2008) 1 April 2007–31 March 2008.Google Scholar
Doenges, Conrad (1966) “Transitory Income Size and Savings,” 33 Southern Economic J. 258–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Ronnie, & Lochner, Marais, eds. (2002) Transforming Rural and Urban Spaces in South Africa during the 1990's: Reform, Restitution, Restructuring. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.Google Scholar
Fay, Derick, & James, Deborah (2008) The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution: “Restoring What Was Ours”. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1957) Theory of the Consumption Function. New York: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James (2010) Overcoming Historical Injustices. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Ruth (2004a) “A Political Economy of Land Reform in South Africa,” 31 Rev. of African Political Economy 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Ruth (2004b) “Land Restitution in South Africa: Rights, Development, and the Restrained State,” 38 Canadian J. of African Studies 654–671.Google Scholar
James, Deborah (2009) Gaining Ground?: Rights and Property in South African Land Reform. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
Keeler, James, James, William, & Abdel-Ghany, Mohamed (1985) “The Relative Size of Windfall Income and the Permanent Income Hypothesis,” 3 J. of Business and Economic Statistics 209–215.Google Scholar
Kreinin, Mordechai (1961) “Windfall Income and Consumption—Additional Evidence,” 51 American Economic Rev. 388–390.Google Scholar
Lahiff, Edward (2008) “Land Reform in South Africa: A Status Report,” Program for Land and Agrarian Studies Research Report. No. 38.Google Scholar
Lahiff, Edward, et al. (2008) Land Redistribution and Poverty Reduction in South Africa: The Livelihood Impacts of Smallholder Agriculture under Land Reform. Cape Town: Programme on Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS).Google Scholar
Landsberger, Michael (1966) “Windfall Income and Consumption: Comment,” 56 American Economic Rev. 534–540.Google Scholar
Mabin, Alan (1992) “Comprehensive Segregation: The Origins of the Group Areas Act and its Planning Apparatuses,” 18 J. Southern African Studies 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manenzhe, Tshilio, & Lahiff, Edward (2007) Restitution and Post-Settlement Support: Three Case Studies from Limpopo. Cape Town: Programme on Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS).Google Scholar
Miller, DL Carey (2000) Land Title in South Africa. Kenwyn: Juta & Co.Google Scholar
Mostert, Hanri (2000) “Land Restitution, Social Justice and Development in South Africa,” 119 South African Law J. 400–428.Google Scholar
Oliver, Melvin, & Shapiro, Thomas (1995) Black Wealth White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality 5–6. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parker, Gail (2004) The Challenge of Sustainable Land-Based Local Economic Development in Poor Communities of South Africa: the Case of Groblershoop, Northern Cape. Cape Town: Programme on Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS).Google Scholar
Platzky, Laurine, & Walker, Cherryl (1985) The Surplus People: Forced Removals in South Africa. Braamfontein, South Africa: Ravan Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Margaret (1962) “Consumption, Savings and Windfall Gains,” 52 American Economic Rev. 728–737.Google Scholar
Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994(1994) as amended by Act 48 of 2003.Google Scholar
Rwelamira, Medard, & Werle, Gerhard, eds. (1996) Confronting Past Injustices: Approaches to Amnesty, Punishment, Reparation and Restitution in South Africa and Germany. Durban: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Green Paper (1998) “South African Department of Land Affairs Green Paper on South African Land Policy 37,” South Africa.Google Scholar
White Paper (1998) “South African Department of Land Affairs White Paper on South African Land Policy s. 4.14.2,” South Africa.Google Scholar
South African Constitution (1996) Section 25.Google Scholar
Thompson, Leonard (1995) A History of South Africa. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tilley, Susan (2007) International Comparative Study of Strategies for Settlement Support Provision to Land Reform Beneficiaries. Cape Town: Programme on Land and Agrarian Studies (PLAAS).Google Scholar
van Tooyen, Johan, & Njobe-Mbuli, Bongiwe (1996) “Access to Land: Selecting the Beneficiaries,” in van Zyl, J., et al. ed. Agricultural Land Reform in South Africa: Policies, Market and Mechanisms. Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Cherryl (2008) Landmarked: Land Claims and Restitution in South Africa. Athens: Ohio Univ. Press.Google Scholar