Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T00:09:02.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Rattling Cages: Joel Handler Goes to Philadelphia and Gives a Presidential Address

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Stewart Macaulay
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Joel Handler is a friend, and I have appreciated his work for almost 30 years. I had dinner with him two nights before he gave his presidential address in Philadelphia. He knew that he was taking a chance by doing something different, and he hoped that he could bring it off. He did. Even if those he challenged raise valid objections to his position—and I'm not the one to judge this—he raised important questions and started us toward important answers.

A presidential address at a professional association is an odd art form. Beginners and those completely outside of the group's tradition don't get to be president. Nonetheless, if all you do is celebrate the mainstream, you put the audience to sleep. You must give the speech during a lunch. You compete with dessert and waiters removing plates. You talk after awards and other ceremonies have taken more time than planned. Entertainment may be more appropriate than challenging thought." Despite all these hazards, Joel Handler flattered his audience by demanding our attention and offering ideas clearly worth it.

Type
Postscript
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , 1992 , pp. 825 - 830
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Goffman, Erving (1983) “The Interaction Order,” 48 American Sociological Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. (1986) The Conditions of Discretion: Autonomy, Community, Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Macaulay, David (1979) Motel of the Mysteries. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1984) “Law and the Behavioral Sciences: Is There Any There There?” 6 Law & Policy 149.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1985) “Control, Influence, and Attitudes: A Comment on Nelson,” 37 Stanford Law Rev. 553.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1987) “Images of Law in Everyday Life: The Lessons of School, Entertainment, and Spectator Sports,” 21 Law & Society Rev. 185.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1989) “Popular Legal Culture: An Introduction,” 98 Yale Law J. 1545.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Silbey, Susan (1988) “The Pull of the Policy Audience,” 10 Law & Policy 97.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., & Esser, John (1989) “‘Critical Empiricism’ in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box?” 14 Law & Social Inquiry 3.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia J. (1991) The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar