Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T20:49:20.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mending Fences: Beyond the Epistemological Dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Extract

In his presidential address, Frank Munger (2001) asks us to consider a reconciliation between inquiry and activism. Although Munger uses the broader and more inclusive term “social inquiry” as his counterpoint to activism, I would like to focus on a particular type of inquiry, one that has deep roots in the Law and Society Association (LSA) and one that is most opposed to activism: social science inquiry. In short, I would argue that tensions that historically have kept the projects of inquiry and activism separate emerge out of a particular brand of inquiry known as empiricism and, among other things, its commitment to value freedom.

Type
Presidential Address
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Jeffrey (1990) “Beyond the Epistemological Dilemma: General Theory in a Postpositivist Mode,” 5 Sociological Forum 531–42.Google Scholar
Allen, Hillary (1986) “Psychiatry and the Construction of the Feminine,” in Miller, P. & Rose, N., eds., The Power of Psychiatry. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank (2001) “Inquiry and Activism in Law and Society” (herein).Google Scholar