Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:26:03.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Medical Malpractice Appeals in a Civil Law System: Do Administrative and Civil Courts Award Noneconomic Damages Differently?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

How do courts award noneconomic damages? Does it matter if the state is the defendant? This article addresses these questions in the context of medical malpractice appeals to the Spanish Supreme Court. Moreover, this study provides the first empirical analysis of the quantification of noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases in administrative courts, where the state is the defendant, and in civil courts. This separation of jurisdictions is a common feature in civil law tradition countries. Yet, critics of this separation in general, and specialized courts in particular, argue that parties might be subject to different treatments and that similar cases might reach different outcomes, namely in terms of the quantification of damages. A consistent result of this paper is that no significant differences between noneconomic damages in civil and administrative appeals were found. The separation of jurisdictions does not necessarily imply that courts reach different outcomes, even when the state is the defendant. Citizens should not refrain from bringing their claims forward against the state, a more powerful party. In the current era of increasing juridification and judicialization of modern life (Ginsburg 2009; Hirschl 2006; Hirschl 2011), it is crucial for society that citizens and other parties litigating with the state are not disadvantageously treated.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2019 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Ted Eisenberg, Michael Faure, Nuno Garoupa, Fernando Goméz-Pomar, Gerard Hertig, David Hyman, Jonathan Klick, Sonia Ramos, Louis Visscher, Rainer Winkelmann, and the participants at the European Conference on Health Economics (Zurich), AEDE (Valencia), ETH Zurich, and the University of Zurich for helpful feedback. I am particularly grateful to Mattia Nardotto, the reviewers, and editors at the Law & Society Review for their insightful comments on this paper (previous tittle: “Non-economic Damages in Medical Malpractice Appeals: Does the jurisdiction make a difference?”). Financial support is acknowledged to FCT, Portuguese Ministry of Higher Education and Science, grant SFRH/BD/37917/2007.

References

Amaral-Garcia, Sofia (2015a) “Administrative Courts,” in Backhaus, J., ed., Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Amaral-Garcia, Sofia (2015b) “Daño moral derivado de lesiones,” in Gómez-Pomar, & Garcìa, Marin, eds., El Daño Moral y su cuantificación. Madrid: Bosch. 393433.Google Scholar
Amaral-Garcia, Sofia (2017) “El Tribunal Supremo y los casos por negligencias médicas en España,” 151 Papeles de Economía Española 2132.Google Scholar
Amaral-Garcia, Sofia & Garoupa, Nuno (2015) “Do Administrative Courts Favor the Government? Evidence from Medical Malpractice in Spain,” 6 European J. of Tort Law 241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlen, Jennifer (2000) “Tort Damages,” in Bouckaert, B. & De Geest, G., eds., Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 682734.Google Scholar
Arroyo, María C. & Yágüez, Ricardo de Ángel (2013) “Medical Responsability and Liability in Spain,” in Ferrara, S. D., Boscolo-Berto, R., & Viel, G., eds., Malpractice and Medical Liability: European State of the Art and Guidelines. Springer.Google Scholar
Avraham, Ronen (2006) “Putting a Price on Pain-And-Suffering Damages: A Critique of the Current Approaches and a Preliminary Proposal for Change,” 100 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 87120.Google Scholar
Avraham, Ronen (2017) “Estimating Pain-And-Suffering Damages,” in The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Tom (2005) “Reconsidering the Harvard Medical Practice Study Conclusions about the Validity of Medical Malpractice Claims,” 33 J. of Law, Medicine & Ethics 501514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baum, Lawrence (2011) Specializing the Courts. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bell, John (2007) “Administrative Law in a Comparative Perspective,” in Orucu, E. & Nelken, D., eds., Comparative Law: A Handbook. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Bielen, Samantha, Marneffe, Wim, & Vereeck, Lode (2015) “An Empirical Analysis of Case Disposition Time in Belgium,” 11 Rev. of Law & Economics 293316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovbjerg, Randall R., Sloan, Frank A., & Blumstein, James F. (1989) “Valuing Life and Limb in Tort: Scheduling Pain and Suffering,” 83 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin & Trivedi, Pravin K. (2005) Microeconometrics - Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, Peter (2011) “Administrative Law,” 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Yun-chien, Eisenberg, Theodore, Li, Tsung Hsien, & Wells, Martin T. (2017) “Pain and Suffering Damages in Personal Injury Cases: An Empirical Study,” 14 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 199237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comandè, Giovanni (2009) “Doing Away with Inequality in Loss of Enjoyment of Life,” in Ward, John O. & Thornton, Robert J., eds., Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Damages Calculations: Transatlantic Dialogue, Vol. 91. Bengley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Cooter, Rob (1988) “Punitive Damages for Deterence: When and how Much,” 40 Alabama Law Rev. 1143–96.Google Scholar
Croley, Steven P. & Hanson, Jon D. (1995) “The Nonpecuniary Costs of Accidents: Pain-And- Suffering Damages in Tort Law,” 108 Harvard Law Rev. 1785–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Frank B. & Donelson, Dain C. (2010) “Creating Quality Courts,” 7 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 490510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, Garoupa, Nuno M., & Gómez-Pomar, Fernando (2010) “State Liability,” 18 European Rev. of Private Law 773811.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, Rochelle C. (1990) “Specialized Adjudication,” Brigham Young Univ. Law Rev. 377441.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore & Heise, Michael (2011) “Judge-Jury Difference in Punitive Damage Awards: Who Listens to the Supreme Court?8 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 325–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, Eisenberg, Thomas, Wells, Martin, & Zhang, Min (2015) “Addressing the Zeros Problem: Regression Models for Outcomes with a Large Proportion of Zeros, with an Application to Trial Outcomes,” 12 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 161–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, Fisher, Talia, & Rosen-Zvi, Issi (2011) “Israel's Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: An Empirical Study,” 96 Cornell Law Rev. 693726.Google Scholar
Farber, Henry S. & White, Michelle J. (1991) “Medical Malpractice: An Empirical Examination of the Litigation Process,” 2 The RAND J. of Economics 199217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Santo D., Boscolo-Berto, Rafael, & Viel, Guido (2013) “Malpractice and Medical Liability: European State of the Art and Guidelines,” in Malpractice and Medical Liability: European State of the Art and Guidelines. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena, Leiter, Andrea M., & Winner, Hannes (2013) “Pricing Damages for Pain and Suffering in Court: The Impact of the Valuation Method,” 10 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 104–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena & Leiter, Andrea M. & Winner, Hannes (2015) “Are Pain and Suffering Awards (Un)Predictable? Evidence from Germany," Working Paper.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno & Ginsburg, Tom (2012) “Hybrid Judicial Career Structures: Reputation Vs. Legal Tradition,” 3 J. of Legal Analysis 138.Google Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno & Gomez-Liguerre, Carlos (2011) “Efficiency of the Common Law,” 100 Ius Commune Europaeum: Legal Origins.Google Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno, Gili, Marian, & Gómez-Pomar, Fernando (2012) “Political Influence and Career Judges: An Empirical Analysis of Administrative Review by the Spanish Supreme Court,” 9 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 795826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno M., Gomez-Pomar, , & Grembi, Veronica (2013) “Judging under Political Pressure: An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Spanish Constitutional Court,” in J. of Law, Econ. & Organization, Vol. 29. 513–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geistfeld, Mark (1995) “Placing a Price on Pain and Suffering: A Method for Helping Juries Determine Tort Damages for Nonmonetary Injuries,” 83 California Law Rev. 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom (2009) “The Judicialization of Administrative Governance: Causes, Consequences and Limits,” in Ginsbourg, Tom & Chen, Albert, eds., Administrative Law and Governance in Asia - Comparative Perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge. 120.Google Scholar
Gómez-Pomar, Fernando (2001) “Carga de la prueba y responsabilidad objetiva" 01 InDret.Google Scholar
Gómez-Pomar, Fernando & Sánchez Álvarez, Víctor (2006) “El Problema de la Responsabilidad de las Administraciones Públicas en Derecho Español: la visión del análisis económico de derecho,” 34 Sub Judice 2747.Google Scholar
Grembi, Veronica & Garoupa, Nuno M. (2013) “Medical Malpractice in Civil Law: Some Evidence from the Italian Court of Cassation,” 8 Health Economics, Policy, and Law 423–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamlin, Rebecca (2014) Let me Be a Refugee - Administrative Justice and the Politics of Asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Rebecca (2016) “‘Foreign Criminals,’ the Human Rights Act, and the New Constitutional Politics of the United Kingdom,” 4 J. of Law and Courts 437–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran (2006) “The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide,” 75 Fordham Law Rev. 721–54.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran (2011) “The Judicialization of Politics,” in Goodin, Robert E., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Political Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Daniel & Rubin, Donald (2011) “Credible Causal Inference for Empirical Legal Studies,” 7 Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karapanou, Vaia & Visscher, Louis (2010) “Towards a Better Assessment of Pain and Suffering Damages,” 1 J. of European Tort Law 4874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Joseph H. Jr. (2004) “Pain and Suffering, Noneconomic Damages, and the Goals of Tort Law,” 57 SMU Law Rev.Google Scholar
Koch, Bernhard A. (2011) “Medical Liability in Europe - a Comparison of Selected Jurisdictions,” 29 Tort and Insurance Law.Google Scholar
LaPorta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, & Shleifer, Andrei (2008) “The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins,” 46 J. of Economic Literature 285332.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (2009) The Making of Law - an Ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Leiter, Andrea, Thöni, Magdalena, & Winner, Hannes (2012) “Evaluating Human Life Using Court Decisions on Damages for Pain and Suffering,” 32 International Rev. of Law and Economics 119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna Yerga, Álvaro (2005) “Oportunidades Perdidas - La doctrina de la pérdida de oportunidad en la responsabilidad civil médico-sanitária", 02 InDret.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Paul (2001) “The Common Law and Economic Growth: Hayek Might Be Right,” 30 The J. of Legal Studies 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín-Casals, M., Ribot Igualada, J., & Solé Feliu, J. (2003) “Medical Malpractice Liability in Spain: Cases, Trends and Developments,” 10 European J. of Health Law 153–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Merryman, John Henry & Perez-Mordomo, Rogelio (2007) The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutting, Charles B. (1955) “The Administrative Court,” 30 New York Univ. Law Rev 1384–9.Google Scholar
Pintos Ager, Jesús (2000) “Scheduling Damage Awards", 1 InDret.Google Scholar
Ramos González, Sonia & Luna Yerga, Álvaro (2004) “Los baremos como paradigma de valoración de daños personales - Comentario a la STS, 1ª, 20.6.2003", 01 InDret.Google Scholar
Revesz, Richard (1990) “Specialized Courts,” 138 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1111–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryo, Emily (2016) “Detained: A Study of Immigration Bond Hearings,” 50 Law & Society Rev. 117–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryo, Emily (2017) “Legal Attitudes of Immigrant Detainees,” 51 Law & Society Rev. 99131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryo, Emily (2018) “Representing Immigrants: The Role of Lawyers in Immigration Bond Hearings,” 52 Law & Society Rev. 503–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven (1987) Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven (2010) “On the Design of the Appeals Process: The Optimal Use of Discretionary Review Versus Direct Appeal,” 39 J. of Legal Studies 63108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Frank A. & Hsieh, Chee Ruey (1990) “Variability in Medical Malpractice Payments: Is the Compensation Fair?24 Law & Society Rev. 9971039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterett, Susan (1994) “Judicial Review in Britain,” 26 Comparative Political Studies 421–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterett, Susan (1997) Creating Constitutionalism? The Politics of Legal Expertise and Administrative Law in England and Wales. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studdert, David M. & Mello, Michelle M. (2007) “When Tort Resolutions Are “Wrong": Predictors of Discordant Outcomes in Medical Malpractice Litigation,” 36 J. of Legal Studies S4778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, Stephen D. (2005) “Comparative Law Look at Pain and Suffering Awards,” 55 DePaul Law Rev. 399434.Google Scholar
Visscher, Louis (2009) “Tort Damages,” in Faure, Michael, ed., Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. 153200.Google Scholar