Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T13:28:26.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Justice, Context, and Violence: Law Enforcement Officers on Why They Torture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Rachel Wahl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do police explain their support for torture? Findings from 12 months of fieldwork with police in India complicate previous researchers’ claims that violence workers tend to morally disengage and blame circumstances for their actions. The officers in this study engage in moral reflection on torture, drawing on their beliefs about human nature and justice to explain their support for it. They admit that they use torture more widely than their own conceptions of justice allow, but see this as an imperfect implementation of their principles rather than as a violation of them. Previous research on the spread of human rights norms has focused on how these norms can be adapted to the local beliefs that support them, rather than on understanding the beliefs that conflict with human rights. I argue that illuminating the self-understanding of state actors who support or engage in torture is crucial to building theory on why such violence occurs, as well as to designing interventions to prevent it.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 807 - 836
Copyright
© 2014 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I gratefully acknowledge the valuable feedback provided by the following people: Dana Burde, Assistant Professor of International Education at New York University; Jack Snyder, Robert and Renee Belfer Professor of International Relations at Columbia University; Jinee Lokaneeta, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Drew University; Benjamin Gregg, Associate Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin; Rene Arcilla, Professor of Philosophy of Education at New York University; and Danya Reda, Acting Assistant Professor of Lawyering at New York University School of Law.

References

Amnesty International (2011) Annual Report: India. Available at: http://www.amnesty.org/en/region/india/report-2011.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. ([1963] 2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Asian Centre for Human Rights (2011) Torture in India.Google Scholar
Asian Human Rights Commission (n.d.) Torture in India. Available at: http://www.humanrights.asia/countries/india/torture-in-india (accessed 8 February 2014).Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher (1998) Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Caldero, Michael (1997) “Value Consistency within the Police: The Lack of a Gap,” Paper presented at the meetings of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
Caldero, Michael, & Crank, John (2010) Police Ethics: The Corruption of Noble Cause. Atlanta: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (2008) Police Organisation in India . Available at: http://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/publications/police/police_organisation_in_india_english.pdf (accessed 21 May 2013).Google Scholar
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (2010) Feudal Forces: Reform Delayed (Moving from Force to Service in South Asian Policing).Google Scholar
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (2011) Police Reform Debates in India . Available at: http://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=182&Itemid=511.Google Scholar
Conrad, Courtenay, Hill, Daniel, & Moore, Will (2014) “Political Institutions, Plausible Deniability, and the Decision to Hide Torture,” Working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, John (2000) Unspeakable Acts, Ordinary People: The Dynamics of Torture. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Crank, John, Flaherty, Dan., & Giacomazzi, Andrew (2007) “The Noble Cause: An Empirical Assessment,” 35 J. of Criminal Justice 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, James (2013) Evil Men. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, Mark (2006) “Introduction to ‘Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key’,” 108 American Anthropologist 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haritos-Fatouros, Mika (1988) “The Official Torturer: A Learning Model for Obedience to the Authority of Violence,” 18 J. of Applied Social Psychology 1107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggins, Martha, Haritos-Fatouros, Mika, & Zimbardo, Philip (2002) Violence Workers: Police Torturers and Murderers Reconstruct Brazilian Atrocities. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2008) India: Hold Torturers Accountable. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/news/2008/11/17/india-hold-torturers-accountable (accessed 10 May 2013).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2009) Broken System: Dysfunction, Abuse, and Impunity in the Indian Police. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2009/08/04/broken-system-0 (accessed 12 January 2011).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2011) India: Investigate Unmarked Graves in Jammu and Kashmir . Available at: http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/08/24/india-investigate-unmarked-graves-jammu-and-kashmir (accessed 5 June 2013).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2012) World Report 2012: India. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/world-report-2012/world-report-2012-india.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregui, Beatrice (2013a) “Beatings, Beacons, and Big Men: Police Disempowerment and Delegitimation in India,” 38 Law and Social Inquiry 643–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregui, Beatrice (2013b) “Dirty Anthropology: Epistemologies of Violence and Ethical Entanglements in Police Ethnography,” in Garriott, W., ed., Policing and Contemporary Governance: The Anthropology of Police in Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn (1999) “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics,” 51 International Social Science J. 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinig, John (2002) “Rethinking Noble Cause Corruption,” 4 International J. of Police Science & Management 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klockars, Carl (1983) “The Dirty Harry Problem,” in Klockars, C., ed., Thinking about Police: Contemporary Readings. New York: McGraw-Hill. 428.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie (1995) Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Law Commission of India (2012) Expeditious Investigation and Trial of Criminal Cases against Influential Public Personalities Report No. 239. Government of India.Google Scholar
Lin, Ann (1998) “Bridging Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches to Qualitative Methods,” 26 Policy Studies J. 162–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lokaneeta, Jinee. (2011) Transnational Torture: Law, Violence and State Power in the United States and India. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally (2006) “Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle,” 108 American Anthropologist 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally, & Levitt, Peggy (2009) “Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Uses of Global Women's Rights in Peru, China, India and the United States,” 9 Global Networks 441–61. Co-authored with Peggy Levitt.Google Scholar
Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India (2011) Report of the Working Report for the Twelfth Year Plan 2012–2017 . Department of Justice.Google Scholar
National Police Commission (1979) First Report of the National Police Commission. Government of India.Google Scholar
National Police Commission (1983) Second—Eighth Reports of the National Police Commission. Government of India.Google Scholar
Padmanabhaia Committee on Police Reforms (2000) Report of the Committee. Government of India.Google Scholar
Rejali, Darius. (2007) Torture and Democracy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Committee (1998) First Report of the Ribeiro Committee on Police Reforms. Government of India.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Committee (1999) Second Report of the Ribeiro Committee on Police Reforms. Government of India.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1989) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunahara, David (2004) “A Model of Unethical and Unprofessional Police Behavior,” Canadian Review of Policing Research, 1. Available at: http://www.crpr.icaap.org/issues/issue1/dsunahara.html.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of India (2006) Prakash Singh and others vs. Union of India and others. Writ Petition (civil) 310 of 1996. Available at: http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1090328/.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham, & Matza, David (1957) “Techniques of Neutralization. A Theory of Neutralization,” 22 American Sociological Rev. 664–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topalli, Volkan (2006) “The Seductive Nature of Autotelic Crime: How Neutralization Theory Serves as a Boundary Condition for Understanding Hardcore Street Offending,” 74 Sociological Inquiry 475–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (1979) Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/LawEnforcementOfficials.aspx.Google Scholar
United States Department of State (2013). Human Rights Report: India. Accessible at http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm#wrapper (accessed 10 Sep 2014).Google Scholar
Wahl, Rachel (2013a) “Policing, Values, and Violence: Human Rights Education with Law Enforcers in India. Special Issue on Human Rights Education and Training: Taking Stock of Theory and Practice,” 5 Oxford J. of Human Rights Practice 220–42.Google Scholar
Wahl, Rachel (2013b). Learning Norms or Changing Them? State Actors, State Violence, and Human Rights Education in India. PhD dissertation, New York Univ.Google Scholar
Wisnewski, J. Jeremy, & Emerick, R.D. (2009) The Ethics of Torture. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar