Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T18:16:20.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jury Selection as a Biased Social Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Hayward R. Alker Jr. ,
Carl Hosticka  and
Michael Mitchell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Models of the jury selection process in a Federal District Court are developed from court records, legal standards, and other information and then compared to determine sources of bias. The jury selection plan developed by the court has been operationally reformulated using 1970 census data to identify bias resulting from even a fair application of the plan. This normative model is also used to test for biases in the procedures and the results of the 1970 plan implementation in Eastern Massachusetts based on voter registration lists. Findings support the hypothesis that the juror selection process effectively discriminates against the poor, the young, racial minorities, women, and persons with low and high educational attainment. Sources of bias are found in the use of outdated voter registration lists, unreturned jury qualification questionnaires, and the excuse process. Recommendations are given for ways to reduce the extent of this bias.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Fall 1976 , pp. 9 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We especially wish to express our thanks for the research of Nancy Lorenz, Caroline Playter, Deborah Anker, Karen Slaney, and Barbara Hines, and to acknowledge with gratitude the assistance of The Computer Center, M.I.T., and the Technology Square branch of the National Bureau of Economic Research. None of the above should be held responsible for our findings or recommendations.

References

ALKER, Hayward R. (1972) “Assessing the Impact of the U.N. Collective Security System: An Operational Multicultural Approach,” 66 American Journal of International Law 33.Google Scholar
BLALOCK, Hubert (1960) Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
GREENSTEIN, Fred and Nelson, POLSBY (1975) Handbook of Political Science. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
KAIRYS, David (1972) “Juror Selection: The Law, A Mathematical Method of Analysis, and a Case Study,” 10 American Criminal Law Review 771.Google Scholar
KELLEY, Stanley, Richard, AYERS and William, BOWEN (1967) “Registration and Voting: Putting First Things First,” 61 American Political Science Review 359.Google Scholar
LANE, Robert (1959) Political Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
LINDZEY, Gardner and Elliot, ARONSON (1968) Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
SIEGEL, Sidney (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS (1970) Plan for Random Selection of Jurors. Unpublished court document.Google Scholar