Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T16:03:05.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injury, Liability, and the Decision to File a Medical Malpractice Claim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Frank A. Sloan  and
Chee Ruey Hsieh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors used two data sets based on interviews with families who suffered an adverse birth outcome in Florida—either a stillbirth, an infant death, or a permanent birth-related injury—to assess the decision to file a medical malpractice claim. These data were supplemented by medical evaluations of liability. The authors found that cases in which the physician evaluators thought the physician had been negligent were much more likely to have become claims, as were more serious injuries. Overall, the view of critics of the current medical malpractice system that innocent physicians are just as likely, or more likely, to be sued than the guilty ones and that patients sue when they do not obtain a “perfect result” is not confirmed. Claims were less likely to result when the family had health insurance, either private or public, and when families who had been told by the physician that there might be a problem with the child. The mother's educational attainment and family income had no effect on the probability of claiming. Mothers who admitted to consuming alcohol during pregnancy were more likely to claim.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , 1995 , pp. 413 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research, including data collection, was supported in part by Grant No. 5-R01-HS06499, “Birth Outcomes, Satisfaction with Care and Malpractice” made to Vanderbilt University and later to Duke University from the U.S. Agency for Health Policy and Research. Collection of data on closed claimants was supported by Grant No. 14045, “Resolution of Malpractice Claims: Birth and Emergency Room Related Injuries,” from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to Vanderbilt University. We thank Stephen Entman, Penny Githens, Gerald Hickson, Bridget Reilly, Cheryl Glass, Christoph Schenzler, and Ellen Wright Clayton for their significant contributions in this study; Christopher Manner and Elizabeth Kulas for computational assistance; and anonymous reviewers of an earlier draft for their helpful comments.

References

References

American Medical Association (1988) “A Proposed Alternative to the Civil Justice System for Resolving Medical Liability Disputes: A Fault-based, Administrative System.” Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
American Medical Association (1994a) “Professional Liability in the '80s.” AMA Special Task Force on Professional Liability & Insurance Report 1 (Oct.). Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
American Medical Association (1994b) “Professional Liability in the '80s.” AMA Special Task Force on Professional Liability & Insurance Report 2 (Nov.). Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
American Medical Association (1995) “Professional Liability in the '80s.” AMA Special Task Force on Professional Liability & Insurance Report 3 (March). Chicago: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
Bovbjerg, Randall R., Sloan, Frank A., Dor, Avi, & Hsieh, Chee Ruey (1991) “Juries and Justice: Are Malpractice and Other Personal Injuries Created Equal?” 54 (2) Law & Contemporary Problems 5.Google Scholar
Burstin, Helen R., Lipsitz, Stuart R., & Brennan, Troyen A. (1992) “Socioeconomic Status and Risk for Substandard Medical Care,” 268 J. of the American Medical Association 2383.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D., & Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1989) “Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution,” 27 J. of Economic Literature 1067.Google Scholar
Cornell, Bradford (1990) “The Incentive to Sue: An Option-Pricing Approach,” 19 J. of Legal Studies 173.Google Scholar
Curran, Christopher (1992) “The Spread of the Comparative Negligence Rule in the United States,” 12 International Rev. of Law & Economics 317.Google Scholar
Danzon, Patricia M. (1985) “Liability and Liability Insurance for Medical Malpractice,” 4 J. of Health Economics 309.Google Scholar
Danzon, Patricia M. (1986) “The Frequency and Severity of Medical Malpractice Claims: New Evidence,” 49 (2) Law & Contemporary Problems 57.Google Scholar
Danzon, Patricia M., & Lillard, Lee A. (1983) “Settlement Out of Court: The Disposition of Medical Malpractice Claims,” 12 J. of Legal Studies 345.Google Scholar
Entman, Stephen S., Glass, Cheryl A., Githens, Penny B., Whetten-Gold-stein, Kathryn, Hickson, Gerald B., & Sloan, Frank A. (1994) “The Relationship between Malpractice Claims History and Subsequent Obstetrical Care,” 272 J. of the American Medical Association 1558.Google Scholar
Farber, Henry S., & White, Michelle J. (1991) “Medical Malpractice: An Empirical Examination of the Litigation Process,” 22 RAND J. of Economics 199.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., & Sarat, Austin (1980–81) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631.Google Scholar
Fournier, Gary M., & Zuehlke, Thomas W. (1989) “Litigation and Settlement: An Empirical Approach,” 71 Rev. of Economics & Statistics 189.Google Scholar
Gould, John P. (1973) “The Economics of Legal Conflicts,” 2 J. of Legal Studies 279.Google Scholar
Hans, Valerie P., & Lofquist, William S., “Jurors' Judgments of Business Liability in Tort Cases: Implications for the Litigation Explosion Debate,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 85.Google Scholar
Harris, Donald, Maclean, Mavis, Genn, Hazel, Lloyd-Bostock, Sally, Fenn, Paul, Corfield, Peter, & Brittan, Yvonne (1984) Compensation and Support for Illness and Injury. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hensler, Deborah R., Marquis, M. Susan, Abrahamse, Allan F., Berry, Sandra H., Ebener, Patricia A., Lewis, Elizabeth G., Lind, E. Allan, MacCoun, Robert J., Manning, Willard G., Rogowski, Jeannette A., & Vaiana, Mary E. (1991) Compensation for Accidental Injuries in the United States. Executive Summary R-3999. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.Google Scholar
Hickson, Gerald B., Clayton, Ellen W., Githens, Penny B., & Sloan, Frank A. (1992) “Factors That Prompted Families to File Medical Malpractice Claims Following Perinatal Injuries,” 267 J. of the American Medical Association 1359.Google Scholar
Hickson, Gerald B., Clayton, Ellen W., Miller, Cynthia S., Githens, Penny B., Whetten-Goldstein, Kathryn, Entman, Stephen S., & Sloan, Frank A. (1994) “Obstetricians' Prior Malpractice Experience and Patients' Satisfaction with Care,” 272 J. of the American Medical Association 1583.Google Scholar
Hoerger, Thomas J., & Howard, Leslie Z. (1994) “Search Behavior and Choice of Physician in the Market for Prenatal Care,” Medical Care, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Peter W. (1988) Liability: The Legal Revolution and Its Consequences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hughes, James W. (1989) “The Effect of Medical Malpractice Reform Laws on Claim Disposition,” 9 International Rev. of Law & Economics 57.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine (1985) Preventing Low Birthweight. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine (1989) Medical Professional Liability and the Delivery of Obstetrical Care. Washington: National Academy Press (2 vols.).Google Scholar
Kakalik, James S., & Pace, Nicholas M. (1986) Costs and Compensation Paid in Tort Litigation, Rand Corp. (R-3391–ICJ). Santa Monica, CA: Institute for Civil Justice, RAND Corp.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. (1991) “Propensity to Sue in England and the United States of America's Blaming and Claiming in Tort Cases,” 18 J. of Law & Society 400.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M., Bogart, W. A., & Vidmar, Neil (1991) “The Aftermath of Injury: Cultural Factors in Compensation Seeking in Canada and the United States,” 25 Law & Society Rev. 499.Google Scholar
Landes, William M. (1971) “An Economic Analysis of the Courts,” 14 J. of Law & Economics 61.Google Scholar
Litan, Robert E., & Winston, Clifford, eds. (1988) Liability: Perspectives and Policy. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
May, Marlynn L., & Stengel, Daniel B. (1990) “Who Sues Their Doctors? How Patients Handle Medical Grievances,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 105.Google Scholar
Mills, Don Harper (1978) “Medical Insurance Feasibility Study: A Technical Summary,” 128 Western J. of Medicine 360.Google Scholar
Nelson, Karin B., & Ellenberg, Jonas H. (1986) “Antecedents of Cerebral Palsy: Multivariate Analysis of Risk,” 315 (2) New England J. of Medicine 81.Google Scholar
Pauly, Mark V., & Satterthwaite, Mark A. (1981) “The Pricing of Primary Care Physicians' Services: A Test of the Role of Consumer Information,” 12 Bell J. of Economics 488.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1973) “An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration,” 2 J. of Legal Studies 399.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H., ed. (1991) Tort Law and the Public Interest: Competition, Innovation, and Consumer Welfare. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Shavell, Steven (1982) “Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal Cost,” 11 J. of Legal Studies 55.Google Scholar
Silberman, Matthew (1985) The Civil Justice Process: A Sequential Model of the Mobilization of Law. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., Bovbjerg, Randall R., & Githens, Penny B. (1991) Insuring Medical Malpractice. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, Frank A., Githens, Penny B., Clayton, Ellen Wright, Hickson, Gerald B., Gentile, Douglas A., & Partlett, David F. (1993) Suing for Medical Malpractice. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., & Hoerger, Thomas J. (1991) “Uncertainty, Information and Resolution of Medical Malpractice Disputes,” 4 J. of Risk & Uncertainty 403.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., & Hsieh, Chee Ruey (1990) “Variability in Medical Malpractice Payments: Is the Compensation Fair?” 24 Law & Society Rev. 997.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., Mergenhagen, Paula M., & Bovbjerg, Randall R. (1989) “Effects of Tort Reforms on the Value of Closed Medical Malpractice Claims: A Microanalysis,” 14 J. of Health Politics, Policy & Law 663.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., & Schenzler, Christoph (1992) “Negligence Rules, Compensation and Incentives for Accident Avoidance.” Unpublished, Vanderbilt Univ.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., & van Wert, Stephen S. (1991) “Cost and Compensation of Injuries in Medical Malpractice,” 54 (1) Law & Contemporary Problems 131.Google Scholar
Sloan, Frank A., Whetten-Goldstein, Kathryn, Githens, Penny B., & Entman, Stephen S. (1994) “Effects of the Threat of Medical Malpractice Litigation and Other Factors on Birth Outcomes,” Medical Care, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. General Accounting Office (1986) Medical Malpractice: Six Case Studies Show Claims and Insurance Costs Still Rise Despite Reforms. No. GAO/HRD-87–21. Washington: U.S. General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
Vidmar, Neil (1981) “Justice Motives and Other Psychological Factors in the Development and Resolution of Disputes,” in Lerner, M. J. & Lerner, S. C., eds., The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. Kip (1986) “The Determinants of the Disposition of Product Liability Claims and Compensation for Bodily Injury,” 15 J. of Legal Studies 321.Google Scholar
Weiler, Paul, Hiatt, Howard H., Newhouse, Joseph P., Johnson, William G., Brennen, Troyen A., & Leape, Lucian L. (1993) A Measure of Malpractice: Medical Injury, Malpractice Litigation, and Patient Compensation. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
White, Michelle J. (1989) “An Empirical Test of the Comparative and Contributory Negligence Rules in Accident Law,” 20 Rand J. of Economics 308.Google Scholar

Statute

Florida Wrongful Death Act, Fla. Stat. Ann. sec. 768.18 (West 1994).Google Scholar