Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T12:03:18.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indicators of Successful Submissions to the Law and Social Science Program of the National Science Foundation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Harmon M. Hosch  and
Matthew W. Oliveri
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the overall success of 1,428 proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation's Law and Social Science Program between 1986 and 1997. On average, proposals were successful 30% of the time. The research examined a number of variables that might have influenced the success rate. The type of institution in which the Principal Investigator (PI) was employed and from which the proposal was submitted, the number of years since the PI had earned his or her Ph.D., and membership in the Law and Society Association at the time the proposal was submitted were significant factors. Variables that were not predictive of success included membership in the American Psychology-Law Society, the gender of the PI, and the type of institution from which the PI earned his or her terminal degree. Finally, persistence is a valuable strategy; proposals resubmitted for consideration after having been declined were more likely to be funded.

Type
Symposium on Sociolegal Scholarship
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , 1998 , pp. 515 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors thank Ms. Judy Rose of the Law and Society Association for her assistance in obtaining membership information used in this project and Dr. Stuart Plattner for comments on an earlier version of this article. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of the National Science Foundation or the United States government.

1

See Cole (1991) for a discussion of experimental replication of NSF funding decisions in chemical dynamics, economics, and physics.

2

For the methodology, see the Appendix.

3

Overall funding rate includes proposals for conferences, training and other projects consistent with NSF's mission but that are not strictly research activities.

4

See Appendix for classification scheme.

References

Adair, John (1980) “Research Funding of Psychology as a Social Science: The Social Science and Humanities Research Council,” 21 Canadian Psychology 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1994) A Classifications of Institutions of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
Cole, Stephen (1991) Making Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cole, Johnathan R., & Cole, Stephen (1978) “Which Researchers Get the Grants,” 279 Nature 575.Google Scholar
Cole, Stephen, with the Committee on Science and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences (1981) Peer Review in the National Science Foundation: Phase Two of a Study. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
de Meuse, K. P. (1987) “A Historical Examination of Author Sex and Research Funding in Industrial/Organizational Psychology,” 42 American Psychologist 876–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intermaggio, Jean, & Ing, Christine (1989) “Funding from the Social Psychology Program of the NSF,” 15 Personality & Social Psychology Bull. 309–24.Google Scholar
Kalucy, Ross S. (1983) “An Exploration of the Gap between Aspiration and Success in Psychiatric Research Funding,” 17 Australian & New Zealand J. of Psychiatry 373–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastriani, Margaret, & Plattner, Stuart (1997) “Commentary: Cultural Anthropology Research Support at the National Science Foundation,” 56 Human Organization 121–25.Google Scholar
Pincus, H. A., & Fine, T. (1992) “The ‘Anatomy’ of Research Funding of Mental Illness and Addictive Disorders,” 49 Archives of General Psychiatry 573–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plattner, Stuart, Hamilton, Linda, & Madden, Marilyn (1987) “The Funding of Research in Social-Cultural Anthropology at the National Science Foundation,” 89 American Anthropologist 853–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plattner, Stuart, & McIntyre, Christopher (1991) “Commentary: The Funding of Dissertation Research in Anthropology at the National Science Foundation,” 50 Human Organization 203–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plattner, Stuart, Aronson, Gary, & Abellera, Benjamin (1993) “Commentary: Recent Trends in Funding of Anthropological Research at the National Science Foundation,” 52 Human Organization 110–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ploch, Donald R. (1978) “Research Funding for Sociology in the National Science Foundation,” 48 Sociological Inquiry 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, A. John, Gullion, Christina M., & Prien, Robert F. (1996) “A Curbstone Consult to Applicants for National Institute of Mental Health Grant Support,” 32 Psychopharmacology Bull 311–20.Google ScholarPubMed