Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T00:51:02.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Judicial Opinion Language on the Transmission of Federal Circuit Court Precedents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Robert J. Hume
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do some federal circuit court precedents transmit across circuits when others do not? Does judicial opinion language influence which cases are more likely to transmit? Previous research on the transmission of precedents has focused primarily on attributes of the circuits or judges who wrote the decisions, without considering whether opinion language also influences citations. This study hypothesizes that precedents are more likely to transmit to other circuits when judges communicate their importance using features of opinion language such as the legal grounding, the amount of supporting evidence, and the decision to file a per curiam opinion. The results indicate that opinion language does influence the transmission of precedents, which suggests that judges who care about policy and are willing to take affirmative steps to encourage citations can use opinion language to enhance their impact.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 127 - 149
Copyright
© 2009 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association in New Orleans, LA, where David Klein and Pamela Corley provided valuable feedback and advice. The author would like to thank members of the political science department at Fordham University for their helpful comments at a brown bag presentation. Special thanks are also extended to Carroll Seron, Danielle McClellan, and the anonymous reviewers at the Law & Society Review for their careful attention to the manuscript.

References

References

Bashman, Howard J. (2007) “Per Curiam Opinions: What's the Point?” Law.com: First in Legal News and Information, http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=900005559003 (accessed 10 Dec. 2007).Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (2006) Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. (1985) “The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts,” 79 American Political Science Rev. 178–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., & Baum, Lawrence (1981) “Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines,” 75 American Political Science Rev. 975–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., & Johnson, Charles A. (1999) Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact, 2d ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C., et al. (2005) “The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Use of the Federalist Papers,” 58 Political Research Q. 329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagley, Alice H., & Chaiken, Shelly (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes, Fort Worth. TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, & Knight, Jack (1998) The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. (1992) “Hollow Hopes, Flypaper, and Metaphors,” 17 Law & Social Inquiry 745–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Michael W., et al. (2001) “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas,” 54 Political Research Q. 623–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1966) “Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals, 1961–1964,” 60 American Political Science Rev. 374–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon (1975) “Voting Behavior on the United States Court of Appeals Revisited,” 69 American Political Science Rev. 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia A., et al. (2004) “Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” 48 American J. of Political Science 123–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, & Gunnthorsdottir, Anna H. (2000) “The Persuasive Effects of Emotive Visual Imagery: Superficial Manipulation or the Product of Passionate Reason?,” 21 Political Psychology 745–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Robert J. (2006) “The Use of Rhetorical Sources by the U.S. Supreme Court,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 817–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Arthur J. (2005) “Publishing Dissent,” 62 Washington & Lee Law Rev. 1607–36.Google Scholar
Kester, John G. (1995) “The Law Clerk Explosion,” 3 The Long Term View 14–22.Google Scholar
King, Chad (2007) “Strategic Selection of Legal Instruments on the U.S. Supreme Court,” 35 American Politics Research 621–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, David E. (2002) Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, David, & Morrisroe, Darby (1999) “The Prestige and Influence of Individual Judges on the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” 28 J. of Legal Studies 371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M., et al. (1998) “Judicial Influence: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges,” 27 J. of Legal Studies 271–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1992) “Reform Litigation on Trial,” 17 Law & Social Inquiry 715–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., & Krosnick, Jon A. (2000) “News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens are Guided by a Trusted Source,” 44 American J. of Political Science 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Joanne M., & Krosnick, Jon A. (2004) “Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment,” 25 Political Psychology 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. (1964) Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., & Garst, Jennifer (2005) “Values-Based Political Messages and Persuasion: Relationships among Speaker, Recipient, and Evoked Values,” 26 Political Psychology 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, Richard Lowell (1994) “The Maligned Per Curiam: A Fresh Look at an Old Colleague,” 5 The Scribes J. of Legal Writing 41–50.Google Scholar
Oakley, John Bilyeau, & Thompson, Robert S. (1980) Law Clerks and the Judicial Process. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T. (1998) “Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issues,” 42 American J. of Political Science 954–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, David, & Gottleib, Stephen E. (1998) “Legal Functionalism and Social Change: A Reassessment of Rosenberg's The Hollow Hope,” in Schultz, D. A., ed., Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Smith, Joseph L., & Tiller, Emerson H. (2002) “The Strategy of Judging: Evidence from Administrative Law,” 31 J. of Legal Studies 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R. (1991) “The Circuit Courts of Appeals,” in Gates, J. B. & Johnson, C. A., eds., The American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., & Haire, Susan B. (1992) “Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” 36 American J. of Political Science 963–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., & Spitzer, Matthew L. (1992) “Judicial Choice of Legal Doctrines,” 8 J. of Law, Economics and Organization 8–46.Google Scholar
Tiller, Emerson H., & Spiller, Pablo T. (1997) “Decision Costs and the Strategic Design of Administrative Process and Judicial Review,” 26 J. of Legal Studies 347–70.Google Scholar
Tiller, Emerson H., & Spiller, Pablo T. (1999) “Strategic Instruments: Legal Structure and Political Games in Administrative Law,” 15 J. of Law, Economics, & Organization 349–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, David J. (1997) “On the Meaning and Pattern of Legal Citations: Evidence from State Wrongful Discharge Precedent Cases,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971).Google Scholar

Statute Cited

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) 5 U.S.C. §§ 501 et seq. (1946).Google Scholar