Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:34:10.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Rights Prosecutions and the Participation Rights of Victims in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Verónica Michel  and
Kathryn Sikkink
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the 1980s, there has been a significant rise in domestic and international efforts to enforce individual criminal accountability for human rights violations through trials, but we still lack complete explanations for the emergence of this trend and the variation observed in the use of human rights prosecutions in the world. In this article, we examine the role that procedural law has had in allowing societal actors to influence in this rising trend for individual criminal accountability. We do this by focusing on participation rights granted to victims, such as private prosecution in criminal cases. Based on an exploration of an original database on human rights prosecutions in Latin America and fieldwork research in three countries, we argue that private prosecution is the key causal mechanism that allows societal actors to fight in domestic courts for individual criminal accountability for human rights violations.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 873 - 907
Copyright
© 2013 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based upon research supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant no. 0961226) and the Arts and Humanities Research Council (Grant no. 0AH/I500030/1) relating to the project titled “The impact of transitional justice on human rights and democracy.” Parts of this material are also based upon research funded by the Pre-Dissertation Fieldwork Grant from the International Center for the Study of Global Change, the International Thesis Research Grant, and the Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship of the U. of Minnesota. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Minnesota, the NSF, or the AHRC. We would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers who provided insightful comments and suggestions that greatly helped us improve this article. We also wish to thank our NSF/AHRC research teams for their assistance with data for this article, and in particular, Geoff Dancy for preparation of Figure 2.

References

Brienen, Marion, & Hoegen, Ernestine H. (2000) Victims of Crime in 22 European Criminal Justice Systems: The Implementation of Recommendation (85) 11 of the Council of Europe on the Position of the Victim in the Framework of Criminal Law and Procedure: Proefschrift. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Productions (WLP)/Vidya in cooperation with the Global Law Association.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel (2008) The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Camp Keith, L., Tate, Neal, & Poe, Seven C. (2009) “Is the Law a Mere Parchment Barrier to Human Rights Abuse?,” 71 J. of Politics 644–60.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Gabriel (2001) “Resolución del Juez Gabriel Cavallo, Juzgado Federal, No. 4. Caso Poblete-Hlaczik.” March 6, 2001. Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Collins, Cath (2009) “Human Rights Trials in Chile during and after the ‘Pinochet Years,’” 4 International J. of Transitional Justice 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Cath (2010) Post-Transitional Justice: Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff (2013 forthcoming) “The Impact of Human Rights Law in Time.” PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, & Sikkink, Kathryn (2011) “Induced Enforcement: Treaty Ratification and Domestic Human Rights Prosecutions.” Paper presented at the conference “From Rights to Reality.” New York University Law School, October 14.Google Scholar
Doak, Jonathan (2008) Victims' Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties. Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
DPLF (2007) Después de los Procesos de Justicia Transicional ¿Cuál es la Situación de las Víctimas? Los Casos de Chile y Guatemala. Washington, DC: Due Process of Law Foundation (DPLF).Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (2004) Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eser, Albin (1989) “Acerca del Renacimiento de la Víctima en el Procedimiento Penal,” in Kaufmann, A., & Dornseifer, G., eds., Gedächtnisschrift für Armin Kaufmann. Koln-Berlin-NewYork-München: Carl Heymann Verlag KG.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., & Bennett, Andrew (1997) “Process Tracing in Case Study Research.” Paper presented at the MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, October 17–19.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., & Bennett, Andrew (2004) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gimeno Sendra, V., Moreno Catena, Victor, & Cortes Dominguez, Valentin (1999) Derecho Procesal Penal. Madrid: Editorial Colex.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Onna (2002) “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?,” 111 Yale Law J. 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa (2007) Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa (2008) “Agents of Anti-Politics: Courts in Pinochet's Chile,” in Ginsburg, T., & Moustafa, T., eds., Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Kaleck, Wolfgang (2009) “From Pinochet to Rumsfeld: Universal Jurisdiction in Europe 1998–2008,” 30 Michigan J. of International Law 927–80.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Hun Joon (2012) “Structural Determinants of Human Rights Prosecutions after Democratic Transition,” 49 J. of Peace Research 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hun Joon, & Sikkink, Kathryn (2010) “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries,” 54 International Studies Q. 939–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchengast, Tyrone (2008) “Private Prosecution and the Victim of Crime.” In Macquarie Law Working Paper Series. Macquarie University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Maximo (2011) “The Diplomacy of Universal Jurisdiction: The Role of Political Branches in the Transnational Prosecution of International Crimes,” 105 American J. of International Law 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Leon, Walter (2011) “Juan Maria Bordaberry: El Dictador Latinoamericano Condenado Por Delitos De Lesa Humanidad,” in Fried, G., & Lessa, F., eds., Luchas Contra La Impunidad: Uruguay 1985-2011. Montevideo: TRILCE.Google Scholar
Lessa, Francesca (2013) Memory and Transitional Justice in Argentina and Uruguay. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Ellen, & Sikkink, Kathryn (2001) “The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America,” 2 Chicago J. of International Law 1–33.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James (2007) “Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics,” 40 Comparative Political Studies 122–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, & Tilly, Charles (1997) “Toward an Integrated Perspective on Social Movements and Revolution,” in Lichbach, M. I., & Zuckerman, A. S., eds., Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D., & Zald, Mayer N. (1977) “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory,” 82 American J. of Sociology 1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, Verónica (2012) “Access to Justice, Victims' Rights, and Private Prosecution in Latin America: The Cases of Chile, Guatemala, and Mexico.” PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda M., & Davis, David R. (2012) “Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights Ingos,” 56 International Studies Q. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ODH (2012) “Human Rights Trials Statistics for Chile.” Observatorio de Derechos Humanos, Universidad Diego Portales, Chile.Google Scholar
Olsen, Tricia, Payne, Leigh A., & Reiter, Andrew G. (2010) Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Peralta, Ariela (2011) “El caso Gelman y los Desafios a la Ley de Caducidad,” in Fried, G., & Lessa, F., eds., Luchas Contra La Impunidad: Uruguay 1985-2011. Montevideo: TRILCE.Google Scholar
Pérez Gil, Julio (1997) “La Acusación Popular: Memoria de Tesis para la Obtención del Grado de Doctor.” PhD dissertation, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Pérez Gil, Julio (2003) “Private Interests Seeking Punishment: Prosecution Brought by Private Individuals and Groups in Spain,” 25 Law and Policy 151–71.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique, & Smulovitz, Catalina (2006) Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reydams, Luc (2004) Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reydams, Luc, Ryngaert, Cedric, & Wouters, Jan (2012) International Prosecutors. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., & Sikkink, Kathryn (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi (2005) The Pinochet Effect: Transitional Justice in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidman, Andrew (1975) “The Outmoded Concept of Private Prosecution,” 25 American Univ. Law Rev. 754–94.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn (2011) The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaar, Elin (2007) “Legal Development and Human Rights in Uruguay: 1985-2002,” 8 Human Rights Rev. 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaar, Elin (2011) Judicial Independence and Human Rights in Latin America: Violations, Politics, and Prosecution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriram, Chandra L. (2003) “Revolutions in Accountability: New Approaches to Past Abuses,” 19 American Univ. International Law Rev. 310–429.Google Scholar
Stephens, Beth (2001) “Translating Filartiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations,” 27 Yale J. of International Law 1–57.Google Scholar
Tiede, Lydia B. (2004) “Committing to Justice: An Analysis of Criminal Law Reforms in Chile.” UC San Diego: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies.Google Scholar