Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T12:35:09.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Bryant Garth  and
Joyce Sterling
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article tells the story of the establishment of the Law and Society Association in the early to mid-1960s. To tell the story, the authors concentrate on the personal stories of the individuals active in that early period and on four university campus sites—the University of California at Berkeley, the University of Denver, Northwestern University, and the University of Wisconsin—at which much of the impetus was focused. They also examine key institutions that funded and/or encouraged links between law and social science—the Russell Sage Foundation, the Walter E. Meyer Research Institute of Law, and the American Bar Foundation. The article seeks also to investigate more generally the factors that came together to build a field of law and social science—which in turn helped to provide the ideas and build the institutions involved in the Johnson administration's War on Poverty. The field was created in part by a process involving both competition and cooperation between law and social science over the new terrain of social problems of racial discrimination, poverty, and crime. The authors suggest that, over time, the center of gravity of the field moved toward law, leaving the social science disciplines for the most part outside. The development of the field generally was also affected by the strong shift in the relative values of these social sciences—especially sociology—in relation to economics in the 1980s.

Type
Symposium on Sociolegal Scholarship
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , 1998 , pp. 409 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to acknowledge the insightful criticisms of Carl Auerbach, Yves Dezalay, Shari Diamond, Nancy Reichman, Ronen Shamir, and Susan Silbey, as well as the helpful editorial assistance of Bette Sikes. We would also like to thank the individuals whom we were able to interview, especially the members of the first generation of the Law and Society Association.

References

Alford, Robert, & Messinger, Sheldon (1966) “The Prospects of a Law and Society Association,” Law & Society Newsletter, July 1966.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Carl (1966) “Legal Tasks for the Sociologist,” 1 Law & Society Rev. 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Carl, & Mermin, Samuel (1956) The Legal Process: An Introduction to Decision-Making by Judicial, Legislative, Executive and Administrative Agencies. rev. ed. Madison, WI: Capital Press.Google Scholar
Beaney, William (1955) Right to Counsel in American Courts. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Bennett (1990) Authors of Their Own Lives: Intellectual Autobiographies of Twenty American Sociologists. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, Thomas, & Cohen, Stanley, eds. (1995) Punishment and Social Control: Essays in Honor of Sheldon L. Messinger. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bohannon, Paul (1957) Justice and Judgment among the Tiv. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1997) Meditations pascaliennes. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, & Wacquant, Loic (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Esther Lucille (1948) Lawyers, Law Schools, and Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Buhle, Paul (1990) History and the New Left: Madison, Wisconsin, 1950–1970. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald, & Stanley, Julian (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Carlin, Jerome (1962) Lawyers on Their Own: A Study of Individual Practitioners in Chicago. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Carlin, Jerome-(1966) Lawyer's Ethics: A Survey of the New York City Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Carlin, Jerome (1970) “Storefront Lawyers in San Francisco,” Transaction, April, pp. 64–74.Google Scholar
Carlin, Jerome-(1994) Lawyers on Their Own: The Solo Practitioner in an Urban Setting. San Francisco: Austin & Winfield.Google Scholar
Carlin, Jerome, Howard, Jan, & Messinger, Sheldon (1966) “Civil Justice and the Poor: Issues for Sociological Research,” 1 Law & Society Rev. 9–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Jerome (1967) Civil Justice and the Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Cavers, David (1997) A History of the Walter E. Meyer Research Institue of Law, ed. J. H. Schlegel. Amherst, NY: Walter E. Meyer Research Institute of Law.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Katznelson, Ira, Lewontkin, R. C., Montgomery, David, Nader, Laura, Ohmann, Richard, Siever, Ray, Wallerstein, Immanuel, & Zinn, Howard (1997) The Cold War and the University: Toward an Intellectual History of the Postwar Years. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris, & Cohen, Felix, eds. (1930) Selected Readings in the Philosophy of the Law. Available in Northwestern University Law Library.Google Scholar
Collier, Jane (1994) “The Waxing and Waning of ‘Subfields’ in North-American Socio-Cultural Anthropology.” Unpublished, Anthropology Dept, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. (1924) Legal Foundations of Capitalism. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Coons, Jack (1962) Chicago, Civil Rights U.S.A. Chicago, Civil Rights U.S.A: Cities in the North and West, 1962. A Report to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Washington: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. (1997 [1965]) Men of Ideas: A Sociologist's View. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Curran, Barbara A. (1977) The Legal Needs of the Public: The Final Report of a National Survey. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Davis, Martha (1993) Brutal Need: Lawyers and the Welfare Rights Movement, 1960–1973. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant (1996) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, Sarat, Austin, & Silbey, Susan (1989) “D'une demarche contestaire a un savoir meritocratique, esquisse d'une histoire sociale de la sociologie juridique americaine,” Actes de la Recherches No. 78.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil (1995) Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, Marc (1991) Antitrust and the Triumph of Economics. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Evan, William, ed. (1962) Law and Sociology: Exploratory Essays. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary, ed. (1995) A Second Chicago School? The Development of Postwar American Sociology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley (1994) There's No Such Thing as Free Speech, and It's a Good Thing, Too. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence (1965) Contract Law in America: A Social and Economic Case Study. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence-(1986) “The Law and Society Movement,” 38 Stanford Law Rev. 763–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, & Ladinsky, Jack (1967) “Social Change and the Law of Industrial Accidents,” 67 Columbia Law Rev. 50–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, & Macaulay, Stewart (1969) Law and the Behavioral Sciences. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence-(1977) Law and the Behavioral Sciences. Rev. ed. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1968-69) “Introduction: The Study of the Indian Legal Profession,” 3 Law & Society Rev. 201–18.Google Scholar
Garrison, Lloyd, & Hurst, Willard (1956) The Legal Process: An Introduction to Decision-making by Judicial, Legislative, Executive and Administrative Agencies: A Revision of Law in Society. Madison, WI: Capital Press.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant, & Sarat, Austin, eds. (1998a) Justice and Power in Socio-Legal Studies. Evans ton, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant, and Sarat, Austin (1998b) “Studying How Law Matters,” in Garth, B. & Sarat, A., eds., How Does Law Matter? Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Philip (1995) Lawyers from Denver: A Century of Service to the West and the Nation. A Centennial History of the University of Denver College of Law, 1892-1992. Denver: Univ. of Denver College of Law.Google Scholar
Grossman, Joel (1965) Lawyers and Judges: The ABA and the Politics of Judicial Selection. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Grossman, Joel, & Grossman, Mary (1971) Law and Change in Modem America. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear Publishing.Google Scholar
Hammack, David, & Wheeler, Stanton (1994) Social Science in the Making: Essays on the Russell Sage Foundation, 1907–1972. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel (1966) “Controlling Official Behavior in Welfare Administration,” 54 California Law Rev. 479–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, Joel (1967) The Lawyer in His Community: The Practicing Bar in a Middle-Sized City. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel, & Hollingsworth, Ellen Jane (1971) The 'Deserving Poor“: A Study of Welfare Administration. Chicago: Markham Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik (1994) “Snakes in Ireland: A Conversation with James Willard Hurst,” 12 (2) Law & History Rev. 370–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazard, Geoffrey C. (1975) Edited Transcript of Interview as Approved by Interviewee (Interview Conducted by Olavi Maru). American Bar Foundation files.Google Scholar
Herring, Pendleton (1997) [1947] “The Social Sciences in Modern Society,” 51 Items: Social Science Research Council no. 1, pp. 2–6.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David (1996) Science, Jews, and Secular Culture: Studies in Mid-Twentieth Century American Intellectual History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton (1992) The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, James Willard (1956) Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, Herbert (1965) Justice in America: Courts, Lawyers, and the Judicial Process. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Johnson, Earl Jr. (1974) Justice and Reform: The Formative Years of the OEO Legal Services Program. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Jones, Harry (1963) “Law and the Behavioral Sciences: The Case for Partnership,” 47 Judicature 109–14.Google Scholar
Kadish, Mortimer, & Kadish, Sanford (1973) Discretion to Disobey: A Study of Lawful Departures from Legal Rules. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura (1986) Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura (1996) The Strange Career of Liberal Legalism. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kalven, Harry, & Zeisel, Hans (1959) Delay in the Court: A Study in Judicial Administration. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kalven, Harry (1966) The American Jury. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Karl, Barry (1968) “The Power of Intellect and the Politics of Ideas,” 47 (3) Daedulus 1002–35.Google Scholar
Katz, Stanley (1971) Colonial America: Essays in Politics and Social Development. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Krislov, Samuel (1964) The Politics of Regulation: A Reader. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Krislov, Samuel (1967) The Negro in Federal Employment: The Quest for Equal Opportunity. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Krislov, Samuel (1968) The Supreme Court and Political Freedom. New York: Free Press; London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert (1990) The Justice Brokers: Lawyers in Ordinary Litigation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronman, Anthony (1993) The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Law & Association, Society (1965) “Enlargement of the Ad Hoc Committee,” Newsletter of the Law and Society Association, vol. 0, no. 2.Google Scholar
Law & Association, Society (1995) Plenary: “Being, Doing and Remembering: The Practices and Promises of Sociolegal Research at the Close of the Twentieth Century.” Statements of Richard Abel, Shari Seidman Diamond, Austin Sarat, Carrie Menkel-Meadow, and David Wilkins, prepared for Law & Society Association Annual Meeting, Toronto.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice (1990) “Goose Bumps and ‘The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life’ in Sociolegal Studies: After Twenty-Five Years,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipson, Leon, & Wheeler, Stanton, eds. (1986) Law and the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Rev. 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1995) “Crime and Custom in Business Society,” 22 J. of Law & Society 248–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Alpheus, & Beaney, William (1964) American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Melli, Margo (1997) “Professor Frank J. Remington Remembered,” Gargoyle: Univ. of Wisconsin Law Forum, Spring 1997, p. 12.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert, Broom, Leonard, & Cottrell, Leonard Jr. (1959) Sociology Today. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Moore, Wilbert (1951) Industrialization and Labor. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Wilbert (1963) Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Moore, Wilbert (1970) The Professions: Roles and Rules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk (n.d.) “Periodicities: Anthropological and Political” Unpublished, Anthropology, Harvard Univ.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank (1995) “Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research.” Prepared for Law and Society Summer Institute, Niagra, Ontario.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura (1980) No Access to Law: Alternatives to the American Judicial System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, ed. (1969) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe (1969) Administrative Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe (1976) “For Jurisprudential Sociology,” 10 Law & Society Rev. 497–546.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, & Selznick, Philip (1978) Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Alice (1996) “Community Action, Urban Reform and the Fight against Poverty: The Ford Foundation's Gray Areas Program,” 22 J. of Urban History 586.Google Scholar
Ohlin, Lloyd, & Cloward, Richard (1960) Delinquency and Opportunity. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard (1995) “The Sociology of the Sociology of Law,” 2 European J. of Law & Economics 265–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Charles (1964) “The New Property,” 73 Yale Law J. 733–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Maurice (1964) The Pretrial Conference and Effective Justice: A Controlled Test in Personal Injury Litigation. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, Victor (1966) Law as a Political Instrument. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1991) The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Silbey, Susan (1988) “The Pull of the Policy Audience,” 10 Law & Policy 97–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry (1984) “Notes toward an Intimate, Opinionated, and Affectionate History of the Conference on Critical Legal Studies,” 36 Stanford Law Rev. 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry (1995) American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Richard (1954) “Social Factors in the Development of Legal Control: A Study of Two Israeli Settlements,” 63 Yale Law J. 471–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Richard, & Skolnick, Jerome (1970) Society and the Legal Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip (1952) The Organizational Weapon: A Study of Bolshevik Strategy and Tactics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co..Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip (1959) “The Sociology of Law,” in Merton et al. 1959.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip, with the collaboration of Philippe Nonet and Vollmer, Howard M. (1969) Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen (1995) Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in the New Deal. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan, & Sarat, Austin (1987) “Critical Traditions in Law and Society Research,” 21 Law and Society Rev. 165–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome (1966) “Social Research on Legality: A Reply to Professor Auerbach,” 1 Law & Society Rev. 105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard, & Wilson, Hubert (1947) Roots of Political Behavior: Introduction to Government and Politics. New York: American Book Co.Google Scholar
Stevens, Robert (1983) Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur (1997) “On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism,” 23 Annual Rev. of Sociology 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Lawrence (1971) “Prosopography,” 100 Daedulus 46–79.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham (1958) The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham-(1969) “Legal Needs of the Poor in the City of Denver,” 4 Law & Society Rev. 255–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David (1984) “Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism,” 36 Stanford Law Rev. 575–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David-(1990) “Back to the Future: The Short, Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement,” 18 Florida State Law Rev. 4–55.Google Scholar
Trubek, David, & Esser, John (1989) “‘Critical Empiricism’ in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box?” 14 Law & Social Inquiry 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David (1951) The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
van Maanen, John, ed. (1977) Organizational Careers: Some New Perspectives. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel (1992) “Origins of the Contemporary Criminal Justice Paradigm: The American Bar Foundation Survey, 1953–1969,” 9 Justice Q. 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yegge, Robert (1963) “Justice Explored—University of Denver Begins a New Program injudicial Administration,” 47 Judicature 106–8.Google Scholar