Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T01:01:23.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Everyone Knows the Game: Legal Consciousness in the Hawaiian Cockfight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Kathryne M. Young
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Past legal consciousness research has revealed a great deal about what individuals think and do with regard to law, but less attention has been paid to the social processes that underpin these attitudes, beliefs, and actions. This article focuses particularly on a “second-order” layer of legal consciousness: people's perceptions about how others understand the law. Ethnographic observations and in-depth interviews with cockfighters in rural Hawaii reveal how law enforcement practices not only affect cockfighting rituals, but are embedded within them. Police practices and informal rules work in concert to shape fighters' second-order beliefs. These beliefs have implications for participants' understanding of central concepts, including order, disorder, and illegality. Examining legal consciousness from a second-order perspective also underscores that notions of legitimacy are constantly created and recreated. Recognizing legitimacy's inherently relational nature helps us understand how experiences of law are synthesized into beliefs—for example, when an unusual police action directed toward a subgroup of fighters compromised the law's legitimacy for them. Foregrounding the relational nature of legal consciousness offers scholars a means to better understand and operationalize the dynamic nature of human relationships to law.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 499 - 530
Copyright
© 2014 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Rebecca Sandefur, who fundamentally shaped my understanding of how law works, and Monica McDermott, who taught me how to be an ethnographer. Both of them not only encouraged this project from its inception, but thoughtfully critiqued multiple drafts. I am indebted as well to Shelley Correll, Robert Weisberg, and a generous anonymous reviewer for insight and direction, and to Elizabeth Gaudet for keen editorial advice. Conversations with Valerie Jenness, Pamela Karlan, Linda Hamilton Krieger, and Mona Lynch sharpened my thinking about legal consciousness. I am also grateful to Karen Cook, George Fisher, Barbara Fried, Amalia Kessler, Bernadette Meyler, Marc Tafolla, and the editors of Law & Society Review.

References

Berkowitz, Leonard, & Walker, Nigel (1967) “Law and Moral Judgments,” 30 Sociometry 410–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrey, Ellen, Hoffman, Steve G., & Beth Nielsen, Laura (2012) “Situated Justice: A Contextual Analysis of Fairness and Employment Discrimination Litigation,” 46 Law & Society Rev. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, Abraham S. (1967) “The Practice of Law As A Confidence Game,” 1 Law & Society Rev. 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boittin, Margaret L. (2013) “New Perspectives from the Oldest Profession: Abuse and the Legal Consciousness of Sex Workers in China,” 47 Law & Society Rev. 245–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Laure Weber, Piquero, Alex, & Cronin, James (1993) “Police Officer Attitudes Concerning Their Communities and Their Roles: A Comparison of Two Suburban Police Departments,” 12 American J. of Police 115–39.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter J. (1991) “Identity Processes and Social Stress,” 56 American Sociological Rev. 836–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlan, Philip E., & McMullen, Elizabeth C. (2009) “A Contemporary Snapshot of Policewomen Attitudes,” 19 Women and Criminal Justice 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLand, Michael (2013) “Basketball in the Key of Law: The Significance of Disputing in Pick-Up Basketball,” 47 Law & Society Rev 653–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornbusch, Sanford M., & Scott, W. Richard (1975) Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark A. (2006) “Law and the Parameters of Acceptable Deviance,” 97 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 49–100.Google Scholar
Engel, David, & Munger, Frank (2003) Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories From Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Amy, Pennington, Liana, & Cronin, Shea (2013) “Juror Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Legal Authorities and Legal Decision-Making in Criminal Cases,” 38 Law & Social Inquiry 4, 773–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Yuval, & Teichman, Doron (2010) “Are All Legal Probabilities Created Equal?,” New York University Law Rev. Legal Workshop (available here).Google Scholar
Fuller, Sally Riggs, Edelman, Lauren B., & Matusik, Sharon F. (2000) “Legal Readings: Employee Interpretation and Mobilization of Law,” 25 The Academy of Management Review, 200–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1981) “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law,” 19 J. of Legal Pluralism 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. (2006) “Mobilizing the Law in China: ‘Informed Disenchantment’ and the Development of Legal Consciousness,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 783–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gau, Jacinta M., & Brunson, Rod K. (2010) “Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner-City Young Men's Perceptions of Police Legitimacy,” 27 Justice Quarterly 255–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1971) The Interpretation of Cultures. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan (2001) “Beyond the Enforcement Principle: Sodomy Laws, Social Norms, and Social Panoptics,” 89 California Law Rev 643–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. (2000) “After the ‘Social Meaning Turn’: Implications for Research Design and Methods of Proof in Contemporary Criminal Law Policy Analysis,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Rosie (2006) “ “Dogs Are ‘Registered’, People Shouldn't Be” : Legal Consciousness and Lesbian and Gay Rights,” 15 Social & Legal Studies 511–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawdon, James E., Ryan, John, & Griffin, Sean P. (2003) “Policing Tactics and Perceptions of Police Legitimacy,” 6 Police Quarterly 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, Elizabeth, & Lyons, Christopher J. (2010) “Perceiving Discrimination on the Job: Legal Consciousness, Workplace Context, and the Construction of Race Discrimination,” 44 Law & Society Rev. 269–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Elizabeth A. (2003) “Legal Consciousness and Dispute Resolution: Different Disputing Behavior at Two Similar Taxicab Companies,” 28 Law & Social Inquiry 691–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Cathryn, Dowd, Timothy J., & Ridgeway, Cecilia L. (2006) “Legitimacy As A Social Process,” 32 Annual Rev. of Sociology 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Moon-Kie (1999) “No Whites, No Asians: Race, Marxism, and Hawai'i's Preemergent Working Class,” 23 Social Science History 357–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David M., & Wong, Sue-Lin (2009) “The High Point Drug Market Intervention Strategy,” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Kochel, Tammy Rinehart (2012) “Can Police Legitimacy Promote Collective Efficacy?,” 29 Justice Quarterly 384–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan (2010) “The Expressive Effect of the Athenian Prostitution Laws,” 29 Classical Antiquity 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Marie (2005) “Idle Rights: Employees' Rights Consciousness and the Construction of Sexual Harassment Policies,” 39 Law & Society Review 83–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. (1988) “Law and Culture in the District Court of Honolulu, 1844-1854: A Case Study of the Rise of Legal Consciousness,” 32 The American Journal of Legal History 16–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maunula, Marko (2007) “Of Chickens and Men: Cockfighting and Equality in the South,” 13 Southern Cultures 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monica (2006) Working-Class White: The Making and Unmaking of Race Relations. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Meares, Tracey L. (1997) “Charting Race and Class Differences in Attitudes Toward Drug Legalization and Law Enforcement Lessons from Federal Criminal Law,” Buffalo Criminal Law Rev. 1 137–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2000) “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment,” Law & Society Rev. 34,201–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2004) License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Petrocelli, Matthew, et al. (2014) “Assessing Police Attitudes Toward Drugs and Drug Enforcement,” 39 American J. of Criminal Justice 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pleasence, Pascoe, & Balmer, Nigel J. (2013) “Caught in the Middle: Justiciable Problems and Use of Lawyers,” in Trebilcock, Michael, Duggan, Anthony, & Sossin, Lorne, eds., Middle Income Access to Justice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Poteyeva, Margarita & Sun, Ivan Y. (2009) “Gender Differences in Police Officers’ Attitudes: Assessing Current Empirical Evidence,” 37 Journal of Criminal Justice 5, 512–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. (2002) “Transcending Tradition: New Directions in Community Research, Chicago Style,” 40 Criminology 213–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Robert J., Raudenbush, Stephen W., & Earls, Felton (1997) “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy,” 277 Science 918–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandefur, Rebecca L. (2007) “The Importance of Doing Nothing: Everyday Problems and Responses of Inaction,” Ch. 5 in Pleasence, Pascoe, Buck, Alexy, & Balmer, Nigel, eds., Transforming Lives: Law and Social Process. London: HMSO. 116–36.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1990) “ ‘ …The Law Is All Over’: Power, Resistance, and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor,” 2 Yale J. of Law & the Humanities 343–79.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. (2001) “Legal Culture and Legal Consciousness,” in Smelser, N.J., & Baltes, P.B., eds., International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Elsevier, Pergamon Press. 8623–29.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. (2005) “After Legal Consciousness,” 1 Annual Rev. of Law and Social Science 323–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, Margaret and Roberts, Christopher N. J. (2008) “Toward a New Sociology of Rights: A Genealogy of ‘Buried Bodies’ of Citizenship and Human Rights,” 4 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 385–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon, & Burke, Peter J. (2000) “The Past, Present, and Future of An Identity Theory,” 63 Soc. Psychology Quarterly 284–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jan E., & Burke, Peter J. (2000) “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory,” 63 Social Psychology Quarterly 224–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunshine, Jason, & Tyler, Tom R. (2003) “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing,” 37 Law and Society Rev. 513–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2000) “A Non-Essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism,” 27 J. of Law & Society 296–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. (1998) “ ‘Everything Old Is New Again’: Early Reflections on the ‘New Chicago School,’” 1998 Wisconsin Law Rev. 579–90.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2001) “A Psychological Perspective on the Legitimacy of Institutions and Authorities,” in Jost, John T., & Major, Brenda, eds., The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 416–36.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2003) “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law,” 30 Crime & Justice 283–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2004) “Enhancing Police Legitimacy,” 593 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagatsuma, Hiroshi, & Rosett, Arthur (1987) “Cultural Attitudes Toward Contract Law: Japan and the United States Compared,” 2 UCLA Pacific Law J. 76–97.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Robert (2003) “Norms and Criminal Law, and the Norms of Criminal Law Scholarship,” 93 J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 467–592.Google Scholar
Young, Kathryne M. (2009) “Rights Consciousness in Criminal Procedure: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry,” 12 Sociology of Law, Crime, and Deviance 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelditch, Morris Jr (2001) “Theories of Legitimacy,” in Jost, John T., & Major, Brenda, eds., The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 33–53.Google Scholar