Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T02:08:29.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Durkheimian Tradition in the Sociology of Law

Review products

Donald Black, Sociological Justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. x + 179 pp. (SJ)
Frank Pearce, The Radical Durkheim. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989. xvi + 232 pp. (RD)
Jeffrey C. Alexander (ed.), Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988. xi + 227 pp. (DSCS)

Show more reviewed productsShow more reviewed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Roger Cotterrell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , 1991 , pp. 923 - 945
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Joseph Sanders for comments on a draft of this essay.

References

BARNES, John A. (1966) “Durkheim's Division of Labour in Society,” 1 Man 158.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1972) “The Boundaries of Legal Sociology,” 81 Yale Law Journal 1086.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1984) “Social Control as a Dependent Variable,” in D. Black (ed., 1 Toward a General Theory of Social Control. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
CARBONNIER, Jean (1978) Sociologie juridique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
COLLINS, Randall (1981) “The Normalcy of Crime,” in R. Collins, Sociological Insight: An Introduction to Non-obvious Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
COLLINS, Randall (1988) “The Durkheimian Tradition in Conflict Sociology,” in Alexander, J. C. (ed.), Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
COTTERRELL, Roger (1986) “Law and Sociology: Notes on the Constitution and Confrontations of Disciplines,” 13 Journal of Law and Society 9.Google Scholar
DAVY, Georges (1922) La foi jurée—étude sociologique du problème du contrat: la formation du lien contractuel. New York: Arno Press (reprint 1975).Google Scholar
DELGADO, Richard (1987) “The Ethereal Scholar: Does Critical Legal Studies Have What Minorities Want?” 22 Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review 301.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, Émile (1957) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. trans. Brookfield, C.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, Émile (1976) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. 2d ed., trans. J. W. Swain. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, Émile (1982) The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. trans. Halls, W. D.. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DURKHEIM, Émile (1984) The Division of Labour in Society. trans. Halls, W. D.. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DURKHEIM, Émile (1986) “The Positive Science of Morality in Germany,” trans. F. Pearce, 15 Economy and Society 346.Google Scholar
EHRLICH, Eugen (1936) Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. trans. Moll, W. L.. New York: Arno Press (reprint 1975).Google Scholar
ERIKSON, Kai (1966) Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
FAUCONNET, Paul (1928) La responsabilité: étude de sociologie. 2d ed. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
GARLAND, David (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIDDENS, Anthony (1986) “Introduction,” in Giddens, A. (ed.), Durkheim on Politics and the State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
GRABOSKY, Peter N. (1978) “Theory and Research on Variations in Penal Severity,” 5 British Journal of Law and Society 103.Google Scholar
GRIFFITHS, John (1984) “The Division of Labor in Social Control,” in Black, D. (ed.), 1 Toward a General Theory of Social Control. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
LENMAN, B., and G., PARKER (1980) “The State, the Community, and the Criminal Law in Early Modern Europe,” in Gatrell, V. A. C., Lenman, B., and Parker, G. (eds.), Crime and the Law: The Social History of Crime in Western Europe since 1500. London: Europa Publications.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, Karl N. (1960) The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
LUKES, Steven (1973) Émile Durkheim—His Life and Work: A Historical and Critical Study. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw (1926) Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (reprint 1978).Google Scholar
MERRY, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1978) Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
MÜLLER, Hans-Peter (1988) “Social Structure and Civil Religion: Legitimation Crisis in a Late Durkheimian Perspective,” in Alexander, J.C. (ed.), Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
NELKEN, David (forthcoming) “The Truth About Law's Truth,” in Febbrajo, A., Nelken, D., and Teubner, G. (eds.), European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law. New series. Vol. 2. Milan: Giuffre.Google Scholar
NEUMANN, Franz L. (1986) The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern Society. Leamington Spa: Berg.Google Scholar
SANDERS, Joseph (1990) “The Interplay of Micro and Macro Processes in the Longitudinal Study of Courts: Beyond the Durkheimian Tradition,” 24 Law & Society Review 241.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Richard D., and James C., MILLER (1964) “Legal Evolution and Societal Complexity,” 70 American Journal of Sociology 159.Google Scholar
SHELEFF, Leon S. (1975) “From Restitutive Law to Repressive Law: Durkheim's The Division of Labour in Society Revisited,” 16 European Journal of Sociology 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPITZER, Steven (1975) “Punishment and Social Organization: A Study of Durkheim's Theory of Penal Evolution,” 9 Law & Society Review 613.Google Scholar
SPITZER, Steven (1979) “Notes Toward a Theory of Punishment and Social Change” in Simon, R. J. and Spitzer, S. (eds.), 2 Research in Law and Sociology. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
SPOHN, Cassia (1990) “The Sentencing Decisions of Black and White Judges: Expected and Unexpected Similarities,” 24 Law & Society Review 1197.Google Scholar
STINCHCOMBE, Arthur L. (1977) Review Essay: Friedman, Lawrence M., The Legal System and Donald J. Black, The Behavior of Law, 12 Law & Society Review 129.Google Scholar
TEUBNER, Gunther (1989) “How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law,” 23 Law & Society Review 727.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, Patricia J. (1991) The Alchemy of Race and Rights: Diary of a Law Professor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
WIMBERLEY, Howard (1973) “Legal Evolution: One Further Step,” 79 American Journal of Sociology 78.Google Scholar