Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T02:18:08.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deterrence and Subjective Probabilities of Arrest: Modeling Individual Decisions to Drink and Drive in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Perry Shapiro  and
Harold L. Votey Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Illegal behavior responding to subjective probabilities of arrest and consequent costs is modeled within a framework of individual choice under uncertainty. The model is formulated for the case of driving while intoxicated and tested with data that include all arrests for drunken driving in Sweden from 1976-1979. Results indicate that an arrest experience reduces the probability that a person will drive while drunk. The results suggest that an arrest increases a person's perceived probability of arrest and/or the unpleasantness of an arrest and thus leads to a reduced chance of acting illegally.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , 1984 , pp. 583 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper has benefited from presentations at the Annual Meetings of the Law and Society Association, Denver (1983), the Crime Control Theory Conference, Carnegie-Mellon University (1983), and the Law and Society Workshop, U.C. Berkeley. We are particularly indebted to Richard Berk, Jacqueline Cohen, Samuel L. Myers, Jr., Llad Phillips, and Daniel Rubinfeld for constructive comments and to the editor and referees for extraordinary help in the development of this paper. The research has been made possible by support from the (Swedish) National Council for Crime Prevention, the (U.S.) National Institute of Justice, and the National Science Foundation's Law and Social Science Program. In addition, a large number of individuals and organizations have helped in the acquisition of the Swedish data. Of particular help in that connection have been Goran Hedström, Torbjörn Israelson, Eckart Kühlhorn, Ernst Nilsson, Peter Simon, and Henrik Thorn.

References

BECCARIA, Cesare (1963) On Crimes and Punishment. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
BENTHAM, Jeremy (1948) The Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Alfred J., Jacqueline, COHEN and Daniel, NAGIN (1978) Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
DARROUGH, M.N. and J.M., HEINEKE (1978) “The Multi-Output Translog Production Cost Function: The Case of Law Enforcement Agencies,” in Heineke, J.M. (ed.), Economic Models of Criminal Behavior. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
HEINEKE, J.M. (ed.) (1978) Economic Models of Criminal Behavior. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (1980) “A Procedure for Estimating Taxpayer Response to Changes in IRS Audit Coverage,” submitted to IRS by Westat Inc.Google Scholar
ISRAELSTAM, S. and S., LAMBERT (eds.) (1974) Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference. Toronto: ARF Books.Google Scholar
JONES, Ralph K. and Kent B., JOSCELYN (1978) Alcohol and Highway Safety 1978: A Review of the State of Knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: Highway Safety Research Institute.Google Scholar
NORSTRÖM, Thor (1981) Studies in the Causation and Prevention of Traffic Crime. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
PHILLIPS, Llad (1978) “Factor Demands in the Provision of Public Safety,” in Heineke, J.M. (ed.), Economic Models of Criminal Behavior. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
PHILLIPS, Llad, Subhash, RAY and Harold L., VOTEY (1984) “Forecasting Highway Casualties: The British Road Safety Act and a Sense of Déjà Vu,” 12 Journal of Criminal Justice 101.Google Scholar
ROSS, H. Laurence (1981) Deterrence of the Drinking Driver: An International Survey. Washington, DC: National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
SHAPIRO, Perry (1980) “A Model of Tax Evasion.” Mimeo.Google Scholar
VOTEY, Harold L. (1984) “The Deterioration of Deterrence Effects of Driving Legislation: Have We Been Giving Wrong Signals to Policymakers?” 12 Journal of Criminal Justice 115.Google Scholar
VOTEY, Harold L. and Llad, PHILLIPS (1972) “Police Effectiveness and the Production Function for Law Enforcement,” 1 Journal of Legal Studies 423.Google Scholar