Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T06:56:50.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporate Crime through Citizens' Eyes: Stratification and Responsibility in the United States, Russia, and Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

V. Lee Hamilton  and
Joseph Sanders
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A citizen's judgment of wrongdoing in an organizational setting may depend on characteristics of the citizen, of the accused, or both. In 1993, random sample surveys exploring judgment of corporate wrongdoing were carried out in Washington, DC (N = 602), Tokyo, Japan (N = 600), and Moscow, Russia (N = 597). Respondents heard hypothetical vignettes about wrongdoing in organizations and were asked to judge the actor's responsibility and related issues; they also provided demographic information and recounted their attitudes toward corporations. Education was more powerfully related than social class to responsibility judgments. In the United States, education's effects on responsibility were indirect, operating through attitudes toward obedience and toward corporate accountability. Russian and Japanese results were unmediated by attitudes. It appears that responsibility is primarily a function of sociolegal factors (such as aspects of the case) and secondarily a function of social characteristics and the sense of similarity or difference they engender. The article concludes by discussing general issues in accountability within corporate settings across cultures.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , 1996 , pp. 513 - 547
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version was presented at the Law and Society Association annual meeting, Toronto, 2 June 1995. Research was supported by NSF grants SES-9113967 and SES-9113914 (Law and Social Science Program). We could not have carried out the research without the advice and collaboration of our colleagues in Japan (Naotaka Katoh, Mikio Kawai, Haruo Nishimura, and Kazuhiko Tokoro) and Russia (Gennady Denisovsky, Polina Kozyreva, and Mikhail Matskovsky). We are also grateful to Ralph Kuhn and Toshiyuki Yuasa for assistance with the data management and analysis. Address all communications to V. Lee Hamilton, Sociology Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742–1315.

References

Alwin, Duane F., Cohen, Ronald L., & Newcomb, Theodore M. (1991) Political Attitudes over the Life Span: The Bennington Women after Fifty Years. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Baldus, David C., Woodworth, George, & Pulaski, Charles A. Jr. (1992) “Law and Statistics in Conflict: Reflections on McCleskey v. Kemp,” in Kagehiro, D. K. & Laufer, W. S., eds., Handbook of Psychology and Law. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. (1988) Scientific Management, Socialist Discipline, and Soviet Power. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Benson, Michael L., & Walker, Esteban (1988) “Sentencing the White-Coll. Offender,” 53 American Sociological Rev. 294.Google Scholar
Berliner, Joseph S. (1957) Factory and Manager in the USSR. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, Joseph S. (1988) Soviet Industry from Stalin to Gorbachev: Studies in Management and Technological Progress. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald (1993) The Social Structure of Right and Wrong. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred, Cohen, Jacqueline, Martin, Susan E., & Tonry, Michael H., eds. (1983) Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform. Vols. 1 & 2. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Bornstein, Brian H., & Rajki, Michelle (1994) “Extra-legal Factors and Product Liability: The Influence of Mock Jurors' Demographic Characteristics and Intuitions about the Cause of an Injury,” 12 Behavioral Sciences & the Law 127.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John (1984) Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John (1989) Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, & Fisse, Brent (1985) “Varieties of Responsibility and Organizational Crime,” 7 Law & Policy 315.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, & Hendley, Kathryn (1992) “Between Perestroika and Privatization: Divided Strategies and Political Crisis in a Soviet Enterprise,” 34 Soviet Studies 371.Google Scholar
Clinard, Marshall B. (1983) Corporate Ethics and Crime: The Role of Middle Management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Clinard, Marshall B., & Quinney, Richard (1973) Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Clinard, Marshall B., & Yeager, Peter C. (1980) Corporate Crime. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. Jr. (1981) “‘No Soul to Damn, No Body to Kick’: An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment,” 79 Michigan Law Rev. 386.Google Scholar
Cole, Robert E. (1979) Work, Mobility, and Participation: A Comparative Study of American and Japanese Industry. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James W. (1985) The Criminal Elite. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Dane, Francis C., & Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1982) “Effects of Defendants' and Victims' Characteristics on Jurors' Verdicts,” in Kerr, N. L. & Bray, R. M., eds., The Psychology of the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Earle, John S., Frydman, Roman, & Rapaczynski, Andrzej (1993) Privatization in the Transition to a Market Economy. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Elder, Glen H. Jr. (1974) Children of the Great Depression: Social Change in Life Experience. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elder, Glen H. Jr. (1994) “Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course,” 57 Social Psychology Q. 4.Google Scholar
Ermann, M. David, & Lundman, Richard J. (1982) Corporate Deviance. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent (1983) “Reconstructing Corporate Criminal Law: Deterrence, Retribution, Fault, and Sanctions,” 56 Southern California Law Rev. 1141.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent, & Braithwaite, John (1983) The Impact of Publicity on Corporate Offenders. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent, & Braithwaite, John (1993) Corporations, Crime, and Accountability. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95.Google Scholar
Graham, Jill W. (1986) “Principled Organizational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay,” in Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L., eds., 8 Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hagan, John, & Palloni, Alberto (1986) “'Club Fed' and the Sentencing of White-Collar Offenders before and after Watergate,” 24 Criminology 603.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. Lee (1975) “The Crime of Obedience: Jury Simulation of a Military Trial.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard Univ.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. Lee (1978) “Obedience and Responsibility: A Jury Simulation,” 36 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 126.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. Lee, & Sanders, Joseph (1992a) Everyday Justice: Responsibility and the Individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. Lee, & Sanders, Joseph (1992b) “Responsibility and Risk in Organizational Crimes of Obedience,” in Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L., eds., 14 Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. Lee, & Sanders, Joseph (1995) “Crimes of Obedience and Conformity in Corporate Settings: Surveys of Americans, Russians, and Japanese,” 51 J. of Social Issues 67.Google Scholar
Handelman, Stephen (1995) Comrade Criminal: Russia's New Mafia. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hans, Valerie P., & Ermann, M. David (1989) “Responses to Corporate Versus Individual Wrongdoing,” 13 Law & Human Behavior 151.Google Scholar
Hans, Valerie P., & Lofquist, William S. (1992) “Jurors' Judgments of Business Liability in Tort Cases: Implications for the Litigation Explosion Debate,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 85.Google Scholar
Hans, Valerie P., & Vidmar, Neil (1986) Judging the Jury. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Keith (1984) Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (1995) “The Spillover Effects of Privatization on Russian Legal Culture,” 5 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 39.Google Scholar
Huber, Peter W. (1988) Liability: The Legal Revolution and Its Consequences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkeles, Alex, & Smith, David H. (1974) Becoming Modern. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Herbert, Blankenburg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert, Provine, Doris Marie, & Sanders, Joseph (1996) Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Jankiewicz, Sara (1995) “Comment: Glastnost and the Growth of Global Organized Crime,” 18 Houston J. of International Law 215.Google Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C., & Hamilton, V. Lee (1989) Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and Responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, Melvin L. (1977) Class and Conformity. 2d Ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, Melvin L., & Schooler, Carmi (1983) Work and Personality. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kohn, Melvin L., & Slomczynski, K. M. (1990) Social Structure and Self-Direction. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lederman, E. (1985) “Criminal Law, Perpetrator, and Corporation: Rethinking a Complex Triangle,” 76 J. of Criminal Law & Criminology 285.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard, & Sanders, Joseph (1986) An Invitation to Law and Social Science. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, James R., & Kalleberg, Arne L. (1990) Culture, Control, and Commitment: A Study of Work Organization and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Markovits, Inga (1986) “Pursuing One's Rights under Socialism,” 38 Stanford Law Rev. 689.Google Scholar
Miceli, Marcia P., & Near, Janet P. (1985) “Characteristics of Organizational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated with Whistleblowing Decisions,” 38 Personnel Psychology 525.Google Scholar
Miller, Dale T., & Ross, Michael (1975) “Self-serving Biases in Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction?” 82 Psychological Bull. 213.Google Scholar
Miller, Joann L., Rossi, Peter H., & Simpson, Jon E. (1991) “Felony Punishments: A Factorial Survey of Perceived Justice in Criminal Sentencing,” 82 J. of Criminal Law & Criminology 396.Google Scholar
Moore, Charles (1987) “Taming the Giant Corporation? Some Cautionary Remarks on the Deterrability of Corporate Crime,” 33 Crime & Delinquency 379.Google Scholar
Nader, Ralph, Green, Mark, & Seligman, Joel (1976) Taming the Giant Corporation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Nakane, Chie (1970) Japanese Society. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Near, Janet P., & Miceli, Marcia P. (1987) “Whistleblowers in Organizations: Dissidents or Reformers?” in Cummings, L. & Staw, B., eds., 9 Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles (1984) Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Peterson, Ruth D., & Hagan, John (1984) “Changing Conceptions of Race: Towards an Account of Anomalous Findings of Sentencing Research,” 49 American Sociological Rev. 56.Google Scholar
Pitt, Harvey L., & Groskaufmanis, Karl A. (1990) “Minimizing Corporate Civil and Criminal Liability: A Second Look at Corporate Codes of Conduct,” 78 Georgetown Law J. 1559.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, & Teune, Henry (1982) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Reiman, Jeffrey H. (1979) The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sanders, Joseph, & Hamilton, V. Lee (1987) “Is There a Common Law of Responsibility? The Effects of Demographic Variables on Judgments of Wrongdoing,” 11 Law & Human Behavior 277.Google Scholar
Sanders, Joseph, & Hamilton, V. Lee (1996) “Sanctions for Wrongdoing in Corporate Hierarchies.” Presented at Law & Society Association Annual Meeting, Glasgow, Scotland (July).Google Scholar
Sanders, Joseph, & Hamilton, V. Lee, Denisovsky, with G., Kato, N., Kawai, M., Kozyreva, P., Kubo, T., Matskovsky, M., Nishimura, H., & Tokoro, K. (1995) “The Dimensions of Corporate Responsibility in Three Societies.” Presented at meeting of Research Committee on the Sociology of Law, International Sociological Association, Tokyo, Japan (Aug.).Google Scholar
Schlenker, Barry R., Britt, Thomas W., Pennington, John, Murphy, Rodolfo, & Doherty, Kevin (1994) “The Triangle Model of Responsibility,” 101 Psychological Rev. 632.Google Scholar
Schrager, Laura Shill, & Short, James F. Jr. (1978) “Toward a Sociology of Organized Crime,” 25 Social Problems 407.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Susan (1990) “Collaring the Crime, Not the Criminal: Reconsidering the Concept of White-Collar Crime,” 55 American Sociological Rev. 346.Google Scholar
Shaver, Kelly G. (1970) “Defensive Attribution: Effects of Severity and Relevance on the Responsibility Assigned for an Accident,” 14 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 101.Google Scholar
Shaver, Kelly G. (1985) The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility, and Blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Robert (1983) Japanese Society: Tradition, Self and the Social Order. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher (1975) Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Edwin H. (1983) White Collar Crime: The Uncut Version. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sypnowich, Christine (1990) The Concept of Socialist Law. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upham, Frank (1987) Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane (1983) Controlling Unlawful Organizational Behavior: Social Structure and Corporate Misconduct. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, David, Wheeler, Stanton, Waring, Elin, & Bode, Nancy (1991) Crimes of the Middle Classes: White-Collar Offenders in the Federal Courts. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin, & Perrone, Luca (1977) “Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality,” 42 American Sociological Rev. 32.Google Scholar