Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T12:42:07.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coping with Precariousness: How Social Insurance Law Shapes Workers' Survival Strategies in Vietnam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Tu Phuong Nguyen Open the ORCID record for Tu Phuong Nguyen [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the role of social insurance law in the survival strategies of factory workers in Vietnam, especially when they are faced with pressing family needs and an uncertain future. Despite the official discourse of the law which encourages employees to accumulate social insurance for their pension benefits, workers in this study have considered their social insurance fund as a form of saving and opted to gain early access to it when they are in desperate need of money. Workers understand and use the law in a way that answers to their needs; however, such action simultaneously puts them outside the protection of the law. In workers' daily struggles, law generates a moral tension between rights and needs, and ultimately perpetuates their precarious, vulnerable condition. The article demonstrates how workers' legal consciousness varies according to their perception of their precariousness, a precariousness generated by the fragile nature of their work and underpinned by their traditional familial moral obligations. This research advances our understanding of the way state law in postsocialist regimes informs social action and consciousness in ways that oftentimes contradict the spirit of the law.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 544 - 570
Copyright
© 2020 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, Sumit, Pan, Jessica, and Qian, Wenlan. 2019. “Age of Decision: Pension Savings Withdrawal and Consumption and Debt Response.” Management Science 66: 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Gabriella, Bessa, Ioulia, Hardy, Kate, Trappmann, Vera, and Umney, Charles. 2018. “In, Against and Beyond Precarity: Work in Insecure Times.” Work, Employment and Society 32: 447–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Anne. 2013. Precarious Japan. Durham and London: Duke Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anner, Mark and Liu, Xiangmin. 2015. “Harmonious Unions and Rebellious Workers: A Study of Wildcat Strikes in Vietnam.” Industrial and Labor Relations Rev. 69: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armano, Emiliana and Murgia, Annalisa. 2017. “Hybrid Areas of Work in Italy: Hypotheses to Interpret the Transformations of Precariousness and Subjectivity.” In Mapping Precariousness, Labour Insecurity and Uncertain Livelihoods, edited by Armano, E., Bove, A., and Murgia, A. Oxon & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Dennis. 2013. “Social Margins and Precarious Work in Vietnam.” American Behavioral Scientist 57: 468–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshears, John, Choi, James J., Hurwitz, Joshua, Laibson, David, and Madrian, Brigitte C. 2015. “Liquidity in Retirement Savings Systems: An International Comparison.” American Economic Rev. 105: 420–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boittin, Margaret L. 2013. “New Perspectives from the Oldest Profession: Abuse and the Legal Consciousness of Sex Workers in China.” Law & Society Rev. 47: 245–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable. London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Carolyn, Hsu L. 2005. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. Capitalism without Contracts versus Capitalists without Capitalism: Comparing the Influence of Chinese guanxi and Russian blat on Marketization. 38(3): 309–27.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha. 1988. “Trust as a Commodity.” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by Gambetta, D. Oxford, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Do, Ha H. 2018. “Strike Settlement in Transitional Vietnam and the Persistence of Socialist and Marxist-Leninist Influences.” In Socialist Law in Socialist East Asia, edited by Hualing, F., Gillespie, J., Nicholson, P., and Partlett, W. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lao Động (2013) “Ăn non” bảo hiểm xã hội [“Eating Ripe” Social Insurance]. http://tamlongvang.laodong.com.vn/cong-doan/an-non-bao-hiem-xa-hoi-157009.bld (accessed March 17, 2020).Google Scholar
Lao Động (2015) Gần 90.000 công nhân đình công vì “không được hưởng BHXH một lần” [90000 Workers Went on Strike for “Not Entitling to Receive Lump Sum Social Insurance” ]. https://laodong.vn/archived/gan-90000-cong-nhan-dinh-cong-vi-khong-duoc-huong-bhxh-mot-lan-679857.ldo (accessed March 17, 2020).Google Scholar
Lao Động (2016) Bảo hiểm xã hội Việt Nam: Nhiều doanh nghiệp chiếm dụng tiền BHXH của NLĐ [Social Insurance in Vietnam: Many Enterprises Appropriate Employees' Social Insurance Money]. http://tamlongvang.laodong.com.vn/cong-doan/bao-hiem-xa-hoi-viet-nam-nhieu-doanh-nghiep-chiem-dung-tien-bhxh-cua-nld-604798.bld (accessed November 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Lao Động (2018a) Cty KL Texwell Vina nợ BHXH, BHYT, BHTN hơn 17,5 tỉ đồng [Texwell Vina Owed Social Insurance, Health Insurance and Unemployment Insurance of More Than 17.5 Billion Dong]. https://laodong.vn/cong-doan/cty-kl-texwell-vina-no-bhxh-bhyt-bhtn-hon-175-ti-dong-593463.ldo (accessed November 8, 2018).Google Scholar
Lao Động (2018b) Lĩnh BHXH một lần: Lợi trước mắt, thiệt lâu dài [Getting Lump Sum from Social Insurance: Short Term Gain, Long Term Disadvantage]. https://laodong.vn/cong-doan/linh-bhxh-mot-lan-loi-truoc-mat-thiet-lau-dai-606555.ldo (accessed October 31, 2018).Google Scholar
Lao Động (2018c) Mức lương tối thiểu vùng chưa đảm bảo mức sống tối thiểu của người lao động [Regional Minimum Wages Have Not Met Employees' Minimum Living Needs]. https://laodong.vn/cong-doan/muc-luong-toi-thieu-vung-chua-dam-bao-muc-song-toi-thieu-cua-nguoi-lao-dong-620904.ldo (accessed March 11, 2020).Google Scholar
Người LaoĐộng (2002) Chiếm dụng BHXH của người lao động: Phải truy tố! [Appropriating Employees' Social Insurance: Must be Prosecuted!]. https://nld.com.vn/quyen-va-nghia-vu/chiem-dung-bhxh-cua-nguoi-lao-dong-phai-truy-to-70636.htm (accessed November 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Người LaoĐộng (2017a) Cần cân nhắc hưởng BHXH một lần [Getting Lump Sum from Social Insurance Should be Carefully Considered]. https://nld.com.vn/cong-doan/can-nhac-huong-bhxh-mot-lan-20170830104008121.htm (accessed October 31, 2018).Google Scholar
Người LaoĐộng (2017b) Chưa quá 40…đã cho là già? [Not Yet Being Over 40…But Considered Old?] https://nld.com.vn/cong-doan/chua-qua-40-da-cho-la-gia-20170601133632549.htm (accessed November 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Người LaoĐộng (2017c) Hối tiếc vì không có lương hưu [Regrets for Not Having Pension]. https://nld.com.vn/cong-doan/hoi-tiec-vi-khong-co-luong-huu-20170705070607568.htm (accessed October 31, 2018).Google Scholar
Người LaoĐộng (2017d) Lao động lớn tuổi: đằng sau họ là gánh nặng gia đình [Older Employees Shoulder Family Burden]. https://nld.com.vn/cong-doan/lao-dong-lon-tuoi-dang-sau-ho-la-ganh-nang-gia-dinh-20170605152447917.htm (accessed November 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Người LaoĐộng (2017e) Quyết liệt xử lý nợ BHXH tại các doanh nghiệp giải thể, phá sản [Tough on Resolving Social Insurance Debts by Businesses That Go Bankrupt Or Close Down]. https://nld.com.vn/cong-doan/quyet-liet-xu-ly-no-bhxh-tai-cac-doanh-nghiep-giai-the-pha-san-20170911105750345.htm (accessed November 8, 2018).Google Scholar
Người LaoĐộng (2019) Lương tối thiểu phải tăng ít nhất 8% [Minimum Wage Must Increase by at Least 8%]. https://nld.com.vn/thoi-su/luong-toi-thieu-phai-tang-it-nhat-8-20190710225156484.htm (accessed March 11, 2020).Google Scholar
Endres, Kirsten W. 2014. “Making Law: Small-Scale Trade and Corrupt Exceptions at the Vietnam-China Border.” American Anthropologist 116: 611–25.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. 2016. “Blood Curse and Belonging in Thailand: Law, Buddhism, and Legal Consciousness.” Asian J. of Law and Society 3: 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan. 1992. “Conformity, Contestation and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness.” New England Law Rev. 26: 731–49.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL & London: The Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, Denis J. 2003. “Legal Failure: Law and Social Norms in Post-Communist Europe.” In Law and Informal Practices: The Post-Communist Experience, edited by Galligan, D. J. and Kurkchiyan, M. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, John. 2015. “Localizing Global Competition Law in Vietnam: A Bottom-Up Perspective.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 64: 935–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, John. 2018. “The Role of Emotion in Land Regulation: An Empirical Study of Online Advocacy in Authoritarian Asia.” Law and Society Rev. 52: 106–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliom, John. 2001. Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy. Chicago, IL & London: The Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Simon and Bronwen, Morgan. 2013. “I Fought the Law and the Law Won? Legal Consciousness and the Critical Imagination.” Current Legal Problems 66: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Xin. 2005. “Why Do they Not Comply with the Law? Illegality and Semi-Legality among Rural-Urban Migrant Entrepreneurs in China.” Law & Society Rev. 39: 527–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Xin, Wang, Lungang, and Yang, Su. 2013. “Above the Roof, beneath the Law: Perceived Justice behind Disruptive Tactics of Migrant Wage Claimants in China.” Law & Society Rev. 47: 703–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 2011a. “Varieties of Legal Dualism: Making Sense of the Role of Law in Contemporary Russia.” Wisconsin International Law J. 29: 233–62.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 2011b. “Resolving Problems among Neighbors in Post-Soviet Russia: Uncovering the Norms of the Pod″ezd.” Law & Social Inquiry 36: 388–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoang, Lan Anh. 2016. “Moral Dilemmas of Transnational Migration: Vietnamese Women in Taiwan.” Gender & Society 30: 890–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Elizabeth A. 2005. “Dispute Resolution in a Worker Cooperative: Formal Procedures and Procedural Justice.” Law & Society Rev. 39: 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Kathleen. E. 2003. “The Cultural Power of Law and the Cultural Enactment of Legality: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage.” Law & Social Inquiry 28: 629–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, Arne L. 2008. “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition.” American Sociological Rev. 74: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, Arne L. and Hewison, Kevin. 2013. “Precarious Work and the Challenge for Asia.” American Behavioral Scientist 57: 271–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, David. 2007. “Modern Law, Traditional Ethics, and Contemporary Political Legitimacy in Vietnam.” In Vietnam's New Order: International Perspectives on the State and Reform in Vietnam, edited by Balme, S. and Sidel, M. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kurkchiyan, Marina. 2003. “The Illegitimacy of Law in Post-Soviet Societies.” In Law and Informal Practices: The Post-Communist Experience, edited by Galligan, D. J. and Kurkchiyan, M. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, Alena V. 2006. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ching K. 2007. Against the Law: Labor Protests in China's Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA & London: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ching K. and Kofman, Yelizavetta. 2012. “The Politics of Precarity: Views Beyond the United States.” Work and Occupations 39: 388–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorey, Isabell. 2015. State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. 2003. “Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment.” Law & Social Inquiry 28: 659–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher E., Mary 2006. Law & Society Review Mobilizing the Law in China: “Informed Disenchantment" and the Development of Legal Consciousness 40(4): 783–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Kathleen M. 2014. “The Precarious Present: Wageless Labor and Disrupted Life in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.” Cultural Anthropology 29: 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lao Động Đồng Nai (2016) Có nên “ăn non” bảo hiểm xã hội? [Should Social Insurance be “Eaten Ripe” ?] http://www.laodongdongnai.vn/Ban-doc/Tu-thu-ban-doc/0E345D/co-nen-an-non-bao-hiem-xa-hoi.aspx (accessed October 31, 2018).Google Scholar
Nguyen, Tu P. 2019a. Workplace Justice: Rights and Labour Resistance in Vietnam. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Tu P. 2019b. “Legal Reform and Struggles against Precarity: The Case of State Workers' Early Retirement in Vietnam.” Pacific Affairs 92: 665–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nys, Inne, Stevens, Yves, and Forman, Jonathan. 2017. “Early Access to Occupational Pension Plans.” European J. of Social Security 19: 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phong, Tiền (2015) Vì sao công nhân phản đối Luật Bảo hiểm xã hội mới? [Why Do Workers Protest Against the New Law on Social Insurance?] https://www.tienphong.vn/xa-hoi/vi-sao-cong-nhan-phan-doi-luat-bao-hiem-xa-hoi-moi-841378.tpo (accessed November 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Pils, Eva. 2016. “Resisting Dignity Takings in China.” Law & Social Inquiry 41: 888–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1990. “…The Law Is all over: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor.” Yale J. of Law & the Humanities 2: 343–79.Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Su, Lillian H. L. 2018. “Resistance, Evasion, and Inequality: Legal Consciousness of Intellectual Property Laws in Two Chinese Markets.” Asian J. of Law and Society 5: 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thireau, Isabelle and Linshan, Hua. 2003. “The Moral Universe of Aggrieved Chinese Workers: Workers' Appeals to Arbitration Committees and Letters and Visits Offices.” The China J. 50: 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trần, Angie N. 2013. Ties that Bind: Cultural Identity, Class, and Law in Vietnam's Labor Resistance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.Google Scholar
Vosko, Leah. 2010. Managing the Margins: Gender, Citizenship, and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
White, Lucie. 1990. “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.” Buffalo Law Rev. 38: 1–58.Google Scholar
Whiting, Susan. 2011. “Values in Land: Fiscal Pressures, Land Disputes and Justice Claims in Rural and Peri-Urban China.” Urban Studies 48: 569–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2018) Life Expectancy at Birth, Total (Years)—Vietnam. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=VN (accessed March 17, 2020).Google Scholar
World Bank. 2019. Early Access to Pension Savings: International Experience and Lessons Learnt. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.Google Scholar