Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:27:54.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment On Weiss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Craig Becker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , 1989 , pp. 773 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

AARON, Benjamin (1982) “Labor Relations Law in the United States from a Comparative Perspective,” 39 Washington and Lee Law Review 1247.Google Scholar
BOK, Derek C. (1971) “Reflections on the Distinctive Character of American Labor Laws,” 84 Harvard Law Review 1394.Google Scholar
FORBATH, William (1987) “The Court-Dominated State and the American Labor Movement.” Unpublished paper presented at a workshop on Critical Perspectives on the History of American Labor Law, Georgetown Law School, Washington, D.C., June 10, 1987.Google Scholar
KAHN-FREUND, Otto (1974) “On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law,” 37 Modern Law Review 1.Google Scholar
LENHOFF, Arthur (1951) “Some Basic Features of American and European Labor Law: A Comparison,” 26 Notre Dame Law Review 329.Google Scholar
MATHEWS, Robert E. (ed.) (1953) Labor Relations and the Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
ROGERS, Joel (1987) “Divide and Conquer: Further Reflections on the Distinctive Character of American Labor Laws.” Unpublished paper presented at a workshop on Critical Perspectives on the History of American Labor Law, Georgetown Law School, Washington, D.C., June 10, 1987.Google Scholar
STONE, Katherine (1988) “Labor and the Corporate Structure: Changing Conceptions and Emerging Possibilities,” 55 University of Chicago Law Review 73.Google Scholar
SUMMERS, Clyde (1980) “Worker Participation in the U.S. and Germany: A Comparative Study from an American Perspective,” 28 American Journal of Comparative Law 367.Google Scholar
SUMMERS, Clyde (1976) “Individual Protection against Unjust Dismissal: Time for a Statute,” 62 Virginia Law Review 481.Google Scholar
SUMMERS, Clyde (1966) “American and European Labor Law: The Use and Usefulness of Foreign Experience,” 16 Buffalo Law Review 210.Google Scholar
TOMLINS, Christopher (1985) The State and the Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
TROY, Leo and Neil, SHEFLIN (1985) Union Sourcebook. West Orange, NJ: IRDIS.Google Scholar
WINDMULLER, John P. (1981) “Concentration Trends in Union Structure: An International Comparison,” 35 Industrial & Labor Relations Review 43.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Fibreboard v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First National Maintenance Corp. v. NLRB, 452 U.S. 666 (1981).Google Scholar
Lyng v. Internal Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW, 108 S. Ct. 1184.Google Scholar
NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 306 U.S. 240 (1939).Google Scholar
Pacific Tel & Tel. Co., 107 NLRB 1547 (1954).Google Scholar
Phelps Dodge Copper Prods. Corp., 101 NLRB 360 (1952).Google Scholar
Texas Air Corp., et al., v. Air Line Pilots Assoc, et al., No. 88-0804-CIV-HOEVELER (S.D. Fla.).Google Scholar