Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T00:48:24.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

This article evaluates the widespread scholarly claim that the courtroom victories of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights movement have invariably provoked a counterproductive political backlash. Those victories have indeed provoked conservative countermobilization, but that has not been their only or even their most prominent effect. Assessing the political reaction to the movement's judicial victories, the policy impact of those victories, and the alternative strategic paths that were available to the movement at the outset, I argue that here, as elsewhere, legal mobilization has sometimes been a promising avenue for pursuing policy changes whose prospects were otherwise quite limited.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2009 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For helpful comments on or assistance with this article as it proceeded through various drafts, I would like to thank Jeb Barnes, David Garrow, Julie Gozan, Bill Haltom, Art Leonard, Richard Price, Carroll Seron, Ken Sherrill, Stephen Siegel, Miriam Smith, and several anonymous reviewers. In addition, Professor Leonard's monthly publication, Lesbian/Gay Law Notes, was an invaluable resource.

References

References

Adams, William Lee (2005) “Gay to Wed,” Newsweek (May 23) 12.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann (2005) Out of the Closets and Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Belluck, Pam (2007) “Massachusetts Gay Marriage Referendum Is Rejected,” The New York Times, 15 June, p. A16.Google Scholar
Bonauto, Mary L. (2005) “Goodridge in Context,” 40 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Rev. 169.Google Scholar
Brown, Mark (2003) “Meet Gays' New Enemy in Springfield: Democrats,” Chicago Sun-Times, 20 Nov., p. 2.Google Scholar
Chauncey, George (2004) Why Marriage? The History Shaping Today's Debate over Gay Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
D'Emilio, John (2005) “Some Lessons from Lawrence,” in Hirsch, H. N., ed., The Future of Gay Rights in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
D'Emilio, John (2006) “The Marriage Fight Is Setting Us Back,” Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide, (Nov.–Dec.): 1011.Google Scholar
D'Emilio, John (2007) “Will the Courts Set Us Free? Reflections on the Campaign for Same-Sex Marriage,” in Rimmerman, C. A. & Wilcox, C., eds., The Politics of Same-Sex Marriage. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dupuis, Martin (2002) Same-Sex Marriage, Legal Mobilization, and the Politics of Rights. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J., & Sherrill, Kenneth (2005a) “Marriage and the Shifting Priorities of a New Generation of Lesbians and Gays,” 38 PS: Political Science and Politics 229–32.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J. (2005b) “Neither an In-Law Nor an Outlaw Be: Trends in Americans' Attitudes Toward Gay People,” Public Opinion Pros (February), http://www.publicopinionpros.com/features/2005/feb/sherrill_egan.html.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J. (2006) “Same-Sex Marriage Initiatives and Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Voters in the 2006 Elections,” Research report, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, http://www.thetaskforce.org/downloads/reports/reports/MarriageAndLGBVoters2006.pdf.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. (1999) Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, William N. (2000) “Comparative Law and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate: A Step-by-Step Approach Toward State Recognition,” 31 McGeorge Law Rev. 641–72.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. (2002) Equality Practice: Civil Unions and the Future of Gay Rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., & Pope, Jeremy C. (2006) Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, 2d ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul (2003) “Acting When Elected Officials Won't: Federal Courts and Civil Rights Enforcement in U.S. Labor Unions, 1935-85,” 97 American Political Science Rev. 483–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, Jessica (2008) “Prop. 8 Foes, Backers Still in Thick of It,” Los Angeles Times, 22 Nov., p. B1.Google Scholar
Garrow, David J. (1994) “Hopelessly Hollow History: Revisionist Devaluing of Brown v. Board of Education,” 80 Virginia Law Rev. 151–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, David J. (2004) “Toward a More Perfect Union,” The New York Times, 9 May, sec. 6, p. 52.Google Scholar
Hillygus, D. Sunshine, & Shields, Todd G. (2005) “Moral Issues and Voter Decision Making in the 2004 Elections,” 38 PS: Political Science and Politics 201–9.Google Scholar
Hirsch, H. N. (2005) “Introduction,” in Hirsch, H. N., ed., The Future of Gay Rights in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, Greg (2000) “Vermont Civil Unions: The New Language of Marriage,” 25 Vermont Law Rev. 1559.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. (1994) “Brown, Racial Change, and the Civil Rights Movement,” 80 Virginia Law Rev. 7150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. (2004) From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. (2005) “Brown and Lawrence (and Goodridge),” 104 Michigan Law Rev. 431–89.Google Scholar
Lemieux, Scott (2004) “Constitutional Politics and the Political Impact of Abortion Litigation: Judicial Power and Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective.” Ph.D. diss., University of Washington.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1992) “Reform Litigation on Trial,” 17 Law and Social Inquiry 715–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1996) “Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being so Positive … ),” 21 Law and Social Inquiry 457–82.Google Scholar
Mezey, Susan Gluck (2007) Queers in Court: Gay Rights Law and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Persily, Nate, et al. (2006) “Gay Marriage, Public Opinion and the Courts.” University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 06-17, http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=900208.Google Scholar
Phillips, Frank, & Estes, Andrea (2007) “Right of Gays to Marry Set for Years to Come,” Boston Globe, 15 June, p. A1.Google Scholar
Pinello, Daniel (2006) America's Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1997) “Should There Be Homosexual Marriage? And If So, Who Should Decide?,” 95 Michigan Law Rev. 1578–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimmerman, Craig A. (2002) From Identity to Politics: The Lesbian and Gay Movements in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Beth (2001) “The Road to Inclusion for Same-Sex Couples: Lessons From Vermont,” 11 Seton Hall Constitutional Law J. 237–57.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey (2003) “How to Reignite the Culture Wars,” The New York Times, 7 Sept., sec. 6, p. 48.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey (2006) The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1994) “Brown Is Dead! Long Live Brown! The Endless Attempt to Canonize a Case,” 80 Virginia Law Rev. 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (2008) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? rev. ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Miriam (2008) Political Institutions and Lesbian and Gay Rights in the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoddard, Thomas (1989) “Why Gay People Should Seek the Right to Marry,” 2 Out/Look 913.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1996) “Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided,” 110 Harvard Law Rev. 4101.Google Scholar
Wangsness, Lisa, & Estes, Andrea (2007) “Personal Stories Changed Minds,” Boston Globe, 15 June, p. A1.Google Scholar
Zackin, Emily (2008) “Popular Constitutionalism's Hard When You're Not Very Popular: Why the ACLU Turned to Courts,” 42 Law & Society Rev. 367–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. Alaska, 122 P.3d 781 (Sup. Ct. Alas. 2005).Google Scholar
Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P.2d 44 (Haw. 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker v. State of Vermont, 744 A.2d 864 (Vt. 1999).Google Scholar
Braschi v. Stahl Associates Company, 74 N.Y.2d 201 (NY Ct. of App. 1989).Google Scholar
Brinkman v. Miami University, 2007 Ohio 4372 (Ohio Ct. of App. 2007).Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Goodridge v. Dept. of Public Health, 798 N.E.2d 941 (Mass. 2003).Google Scholar
Hebel v. West, 25 A.D.3d 172 (Sup. Ct. NY, App. Div., 3rd Dept. 2005).Google Scholar
In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757 (Calif. Sup. Ct. 2008).Google Scholar
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, 289 Conn. 135 (Conn. Sup. Ct. 2008).Google Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Google Scholar
Lemons v. Bradbury, No. 08-35209 (9th Cir., August 14, 2008).Google Scholar
Lewis v. Harris, 908 A. 2d 196 (N.J. 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockyer v. San Francisco, 95 P. 3d 459 (2004).Google Scholar
Martinez v. County of Monroe, 850 N.Y.S.2d 740 (App. Div. 4th Dept. 2008).Google Scholar
National Pride at Work v. Governor of Michigan, 748 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008).Google Scholar
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996).Google Scholar
Snetsinger v. Montana University System, 104 P.3d 445 (Sup. Ct. Mon. 2004).Google Scholar
Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University, 971 P.2d 435 (Or. Ct. of App. 1998).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Civil Unions Act, 15 V.S.A. § 1201 et seq. (2008 [originally enacted 2000]).Google Scholar
Defense of Marriage Act, 1 U.S.C. § 7 and 28 U.S.C. §1738C1996.Google Scholar
Reciprocal Beneficiaries Act of 1997, H.R.S. § 572C-3 et seq. (2008).Google Scholar