Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-07T06:40:19.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Realizing the Right to Access in France: Between Implementation and Activation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Anne Revillard Open the ORCID record for Anne Revillard [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the realization of the right to access in France, based on biographical interviews with people with mobility or visual impairments. I lay out an original theoretical framework for studying rights realization at the individual level. Although rights activation is the horizon of most rights consciousness research, I argue that rights do not necessarily need to be activated in order to be made real. This realization may also derive from effective policy implementation. In France, however, disabled individuals are very active in realizing their right to access, in a context of insufficient implementation. Moreover, although there is limited collective mobilization, several types of policy feedbacks fuel rights activation and the emergence of grievances regarding the lack of accessibility. Studying the realization of the right to access thus opens up promising perspectives for sociolegal research.

Type
Special Issue: Disability Legal Studies Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 950 - 982
Copyright
© 2019 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was funded by a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the “Investissements d'Avenir” program LIEPP (reference: ANR-11-LABX-0091, ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02). Previous versions of this paper were presented at the 2018 Law and society conference and the 2018 ALTER conference. I wish to thank Katharina Heyer, Sagit Mor, and the LSR reviewers for their most useful comments on previous versions of the text. I also wish to express my gratitude to research participants for sharing their life stories and experiences of the lack of access in France.

References

References

Barnartt, Sharon & Scotch, Richard K. (2001) Disability Protests. Contentious Politics, 1970–1999. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jeb & Burke, Thomas F. (2006) “The Diffusion of Rights: From Rights on the Books to Organizational Rights Practices,” 40 Law and Society Rev. 493–524.Google Scholar
Pierre-Yves, Baudot and Revillard, Anne. 2016. “Faire Campagnesans Prendre Parti: Opportunités et Contraintes Des Campagnes Électorales Pour Les Associations de Personnes Handicapées.” PP. 77–102 in Le lobbying électoral. Groupes en campagne dans l'élection présidentielle de 2012, edited by G. Courty and J. Gervais. Lille: Presses du Septentrion/“Espaces politiques”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyrie, Adeline (2015) Vivre Avec Le Handicap. L'expérience de l'incapacité Motrice Majeure. Rennes, France: Presses Univ. de Rennes/ Le Sens Social.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Thomas F. (2002) Lawyers, Lawsuits, and Legal Rights. The Battle over Litigation in American Society. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul (1991) “Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity,” 96 American J. of Sociology 1201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea L. (2012) “Policy Makes Mass Politics,” 15 Annual Rev. of Political Science 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, Claire-Lise (2013) Réussir 2015: Accessibilité Des Personnes Handicapées Aux Logements, Aux Établissements Recevant Du Public, Aux Transports, à La Voirie et Aux Espaces Publics. Paris, France: Sénat.Google Scholar
Campion, Claire-Lise & Debré, Isabelle (2012) Rapport d'information Au Nom de La Commission Pour Le Contrôle de l'application Des Lois Sur l'application de La Loi N°2005–102 Du 11 Février 2005 Pour l'égalité Des Droits et Des Chances, La Participation et La Citoyenneté Des Personnes Handicapées. Paris, France: Sénat.Google Scholar
CGEDD, IGAS, and CGEFi (2011) Rapport Sur Les Modalités d'application Des Règles d'accessibilité Du Cadre Bâti Pour Les Personnes Handicapées. Paris, France: IGAS.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel (1990) L'invention Du Quotidien. Paris, France: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Dejoux, Virginie (2015) “Les Difficultés d'accès à l'environnement. Un Frein Lors de La Transition Vers l'âge Adulte Des Jeunes Reconnus « handicapés »,” 71 Agora Débats/Jeunesses 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Vincent (2010) The Bureaucrat and the Poor. Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (1990) “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace,” 95 American J. of Sociology 1401–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (1992) “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law,” 97 American J. of Sociology 1531–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M. (1991) “Law, Culture, and Children with Disabilities: Educational Rights and the Construction of Difference,” Duke Law J. 166–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M. & Munger, Frank W. (2003) “Rights of Inclusion,” in Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. & Munger, Frank W. (2007) “Narrative, Disability, and Identity,” 15 Narrative 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. (2009) Making Rights Real. Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia & Silbey, Susan (1995) “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative,” 29 Law and Society Rev. 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia & Silbey, Susan S. (2003) “Narrating Social Structure: Stories of Resistance to Legal Authority,” 108 American J. of Sociology 1328–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felstiner, W., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming,” 15 Law and Society Rev. 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, Martha A. (2008) “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition,” 20 Yale J. of Law and Feminism 1–23.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Doris Z. & Zames, Frieda (2011) The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation. Philadelphia, PN: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fleury-Steiner, Benjamin & Nielsen, Laura B., eds. (2006) The New Civil Rights Research: A Constitutive Approach. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
French, Sally & Swain, John (2006) “Telling Stories for a Politics of Hope,” 21 Disability & Society 383–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law and Society Rev. 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie (2005) “Feminist Disability Studies,” 30 Signs 1557–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Haglund, La Dawn & Stryker, Robin, eds. (2015) Closing the Rights Gap: From Human Rights to Social Transformation. Oakland. Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, Katharina (2002) “The ADA on the Road: Disability Rights in Germany,” 27 Law & Social Inquiry 723–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, Katharina (2007) “A Disability Lens on Sociolegal Research: Reading ‘Rights of Inclusion’ from a Disability Studies Perspective,” 32 Law & Social Inquiry 261–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, Katharina (2015) Rights Enabled: The Disability Revolution, from the US, to Germany and Japan, to the United Nations. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1985) “The Ideology of Law: Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law,” 19 Law and Society Rev. 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1993) Explorations in Law and Society: Towards a Constitutive Theory of Law. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
James, Deborah & Killick, Evan (2012) “Empathy and Expertise: Case Workers and Immigration/Asylum Applicants in London,” 37 Law & Social Inquiry 430–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Anna (2008) “Think of the Hippopotamus: Rights Consciousness in the Fat Acceptance Movement,” 42 Law and Society Rev. 397–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva (2011) “The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability,” 24 Ratio Juris 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, Pendergrass, Sabrina, & Pachucki, Mark C. (2015) “Symbolic Boundaries,” in International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. 850–5.Google Scholar
Larrouy, Muriel (2011) L'invention de l'accessibilité. Des Politiques de Transports Des Personnes Handicapées Aux Politiques d'accessibilité de 1975 à. Grenoble, France: PUG/Coll. Handicap vieillissement société. 2005.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. (2014) “Accessibility Obligations in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Nyusti & Takacs v. Hungary,” 30 South African J. on Human Rights 380–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Sandra (2014) Caring for Our Own: Why There Is No Political Demand for New American Social Welfare Rights. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lid, Inger M. & Solvang, Per, K. (2016) “(Dis)Ability and the Experience of Accessibility in the Urban Environment,” 10 Alter 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, Michael (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lovell, George (2012) This Is Not Civil Rights: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malacrida, Claudia (2007) “Negotiating the Dependency/Nurturance Tightrope: Dilemmas of Motherhood and Disability,” 44 Canadian Rev. of Sociology 469–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria (2005) Confronting Sexual Harassment: The Law and Politics of Everyday Life. Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria & Barclay, Scott (2003) “In Their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World,” 28 Law and Social Inquiry 617–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Moody, Steven & Musheno, Michael (2003) Cops, Teachers, Counselors. Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, & Tilly, Charles (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (2006) Law and Social Movements. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D. & Zald, Mayer N. (1977) “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory,” 82 American J. of Sociology 1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Engle, Sally, Peggy L., Rosen, Mihaela S., & Yoon, Diana H. (2010) “Law from Below: Women's Human Rights and Social Movements in New York City,” 44 Law & Society Rev. 101–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1986) “Everyday Understandings of the Law in Working-Class America,” 13 American Ethnologist 253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minow, Martha (1987) “Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover,” 96 The Yale Law J. 1860–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mor, Sagit (2018) “With Access and Justice for All,” 39 Cardozo Law Rev. 611–47.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael & Barnes, Colin (2012) The New Politics of Disablement. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Susan M. (1984) Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Wesport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, Thomas F. (2015) “Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation,” 78 Social Psychology Quarterly 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul (1993) “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change,” 45 World Politics 95–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Michael (2009) Absent Citizens: Disability Politics and Policy in Canada. Toronto, ON: Univ. of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1990) “‘The Law Is All Over'’: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor,” 2 Yale J. of Law & the Humanities 343–79.Google Scholar
Revillard, Anne. (2017a) “La Réception Des Politiques Du Handicap: Une Approche Par Entretiens Biographiques,” 58 Revue Française de Sociologie 71–95.Google Scholar
Revillard, Anne. 2017b) “Social Movements and the Politics of Bureaucratic Rights Enforcement:Insights from the Allocation of Disability Rights in France,” 42 Law and Social Inquiry 450–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin & Scheingold, Stuart A. (1998) Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin & Scheingold, Stuart A. (2001) Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, Ani B. (2008) “Disability, Vulnerability and the Limits of Antidiscrimination,” 83 Washington Law Rev. 513–68.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (1974) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. & Sarat, Austin (2004) Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scotch, Richard K. (2001) From Good Will to Civil Rights: Transforming Federal Disability Policy. Philadelphia, PN: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James (1991) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Sonali & Priestley, Mark (2011) Disability and Social Change. Private Lives and Public Policies. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Stryker, Robin (2003) “Mind the Gap: Law, Institutional Analysis and Socioeconomics,” 1 Socio-Economic Rev. 335–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, John, French, Sally, Barnes, Colin, & Thomas, Carol, eds. (2013) Disabling Barriers—Enabling Environments. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin A. (2009) “The Privatization of Public Legal Rights: How Manufacturers Construct the Meaning of Consumer Law,” 43 Law and Society Rev. 527–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
tenBroek, Jacobus (1966) “The Right to Live in the World: The Disabled in the Law of Torts,” 54 California Law Rev. 841–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa (2011) Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Winance, Myriam, Ville, Isabelle, & Ravaud, Jean-François (2007) “Disability Policies in France: Changes and Tensions between the Category-Based, Universalist and Personalized Approaches,” 9 Scandinavian J. of Disability Research 160–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (1988) “Making Law at the Doorway: The Clerk, the Court, and the Construction of Community in a New England Town,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 409–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statutes Cited

Loi n° 75–534 du 30 juin 1975 d'orientation en faveur des personnes handicapées [Framework Law in Favor of Disabled Persons, June 30, 1975].

Loi n° 2005–102 du 11 février 2005 pour l'égalité des droits et des chances, la participation et la citoyenneté des personnes handicapées [Law on the Equal Rights and Opportunities, the Participation and the Citizenship of Disabled Persons, February 11, 2005.]

Ordonnance n° 2014–1090 du 26 septembre 2014 relative à la mise en accessibilité des établissements recevant du public, des transports publics, des bâtiments d'habitation et de la voirie pour les personnes handicapées [Ordinance on the Accessibility of Public Buildings and Transportation, Housing Units and Streets, for Disabled Persons, September 26, 2014].

Loi n° 2015–988 du 5 août 2015 ratifiant l'ordonnance n° 2014–1090 du 26 septembre 2014 relative à la mise en accessibilité des établissements recevant du public, des transports publics, des bâtiments d'habitation et de la voirie pour les personnes handicapées et visant à favoriser l'accès au service civique pour les jeunes en situation de handicap [Law Ratifying the 26/09/2014 Ordinance and Favoring Access to Civic Service for Disabled Youths, August 5, 2015].