Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:28:06.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questions of Validity and Drawing Conclusions from Simulation Studies in Procedural Justice: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Jill K. Anderson  and
Robert M. Hayden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , 1981 , pp. 293 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ARCURI, Alan (1974) “The Jailed Defendant's View of Plea Bargaining,” 14 Court Review 14.Google Scholar
BUCKNER, H. Taylor (1970) “Transformations of Reality in the Legal Process,” 37 Social Research 88.Google Scholar
COMAROFF, John and Simon, ROBERTS (1977) “The Invocation of Norms in Dispute Settlement: the Tswana Case,” in Hamnett, Ian (ed.), Social Anthropology and Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
DAMASKA, Mirjan (1975) “Presentation of Evidence and Factfinding Precision,” 123 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1083.Google Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm (1979) “Pleading Guilty in Lower Courts,” 13 Law & Society Review 461.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
HAYDEN, Robert M. and Jill K., ANDERSON (1979) “On the Evaluation of Procedural Systems in Laboratory Experiments: A Critique of Thibaut and Walker,” 3 Law and Human Behavior 21.Google Scholar
HEINZ, Anne and Wayne, KERSTETTER (1979) “Pretrial Settlement Conference: Evaluation of a Reform in Plea Bargaining,” 13 Law & Society Review 349.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert (1974) “Formal Litigation and Professional Insecurity: Legal Entrepreneurship in South India,” 9 Law & Society Review 11.Google Scholar
KONEC̃NI, Vladimir and Ebbe, EBBESEN (1979) “External Validity of Research in Legal Psychology,” 3 Law and Human Behavior 39.Google Scholar
LA TOUR, Stephen (1978) “Determinants of Participant and Observer Satisfaction with Adversary and Inquisitorial Modes of Adjudication,” 36 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1531.Google Scholar
LA TOUR, Stephen, HOULDEN, Pauline, WALKER, Laurens, and John, THIBAUT (1976) “Procedure: Transnational Perspectives and Preferences,” 86 Yale Law Journal 258.Google Scholar
LIND, E. Allan and Laurens, WALKER (1979) “Theory Testing, Theory Development, and Laboratory Research on Legal Issues,” 3 Law and Human Behavior 5.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, Karl (1962) “A Lecture on Appellate Advocacy,” 29 Chicago Law Review 627.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn (1979) Plea Bargaining or Trial? Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn (1981) “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Review (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1977) “Individual Interests and Organizational Structures: Dispute Settlements as ‘Events of Articulation,‘” in Hamnett, Ian (ed.), Social Anthropology and Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
SHEPPARD, Blair and Neil, VIDMAR (1980) “Adversary Trial Procedures and Testimonial Evidence: Effect of Lawyer's Role and Machiavellianism,” 39 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 320.Google Scholar
VIDMAR, Neil (1979) “The Other Issues in Jury Simulation Research: A Commentary with Particular Reference to Defendant Character Studies,” 3 Law and Human Behavior 95.Google Scholar
WALKER, Laurens, TOUR, Stephen LA, LIND, E. Allan, and John, THIBAUT (1974) “Reactions of Participants and Observers to Modes of Adjudication,” 4 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 295.Google Scholar