Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T00:23:43.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Politics, Constitutional Interpretation, and Abortion Rights Jurisprudence

Review products

Devins Neal, Shaping Constitutional Values. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1996. x + 193 pp. $45 cloth; $14.95 paper.
Dworkin Ronald, Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996. 404 pp. $35.00 cloth.
McDonagh Eileen, Breaking the Abortion Deadlock: From Choice to Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. viii + 280 pp. $49.95 cloth; $24.95 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Gayle Binion
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , 1997 , pp. 845 - 870
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Adler, Renata (1986) Reckless Disregard: Westmoreland v. CBS et al., Sharon v. Time. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Binion, Gayle (1988–89) “Reproductive Freedom and the Constitution: The Limits on Choice,” 4 Berkeley Women's Law J. 12–41.Google Scholar
Binion, Gayle-(1997) “Feminist Theory Confronts U. S. Supreme Court Rhetoric: The Case of Abortion Rights,” 11 International J. of Law, Policy & the Family 63–85.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. (1990) The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burgess, Susan R. (1992) Contest for Constitutional Authority: The Abortion and War Powers Debates. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Cooper-Davis, Peggy (1993) “Neglected Stories and the Lawfulness of Roe v. Wade”, 28 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Rev. 299–394.Google Scholar
Craig, Barbara Hinkson, & O'Brien, David M. (1993) Abortion and American Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Janet (1987) “Prenatal Invasions and Interventions: What's Wrong with Fetal Rights,” 10 Harvard Women's Law J. 9–58.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon, & Jahnige, Thomas P. (1985) The Federal Courts as a Political System. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G., ed. (1995) Perspectives on the Politics of Abortion. Westport, CT: Praeger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Charles A. & Canon, Bradley C. (1984) Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Karst, Kenneth L. (1993) Law's Promise, Law's Expression: Visions of Power in the Politics of Race, Gender, and Religion. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew (1990) “Forced Labor: A Thirteenth Amendment Defense of Abortion,” 84 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 480–535.Google Scholar
Lewis, Anthony (1991) Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1993) Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Neff, Christyne L. (1991) “Women, Womb, and Bodily Integrity,” 3 Yale J. of Law & Feminism 327–53.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen (1996) No Neutral Ground?: Abortion Politics in an Age of Absolutes. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Power, Brenda Miller (1997) “The Danger Inherent in Abusing Academic Freedom,” Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A52 (20 June).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1971) “A Defense of Abortion,” 1 Philosophy & Public Affairs 47–66.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. (1985) “The Abortion Funding Conundrum: Inalienable Rights, Affirmative Duties and the Dilemma of Dependence,” 99 Harvard Law Rev. 330–43.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. (1990) Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: W. W. Norton & Co..Google Scholar
West, Robin (1988) “Jurisprudence and Gender,” 55 Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 1–72.Google Scholar

Cases

Abington v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963).Google Scholar
In re A.C., 573 A.2d 1235 (D.C. 1990) en banc.Google Scholar
In re George, 630 S.W. 2d (Mo. App. 1982).Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).Google Scholar
City of Boerne v. Flores, Archbishop of San Antonio, 117 S. Ct. 2157 (1997).Google Scholar
Curran v. Bosze, 141 Ill. 2d. 473 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Employment Division, Oregon Department of Human Resources v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).Google Scholar
Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986).Google Scholar
Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U. S. 996 (1979).Google Scholar
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803).Google Scholar
McFall v. Shimp, 10 Pa. D. & C. 3d 90 (Allegheny County Ct., Pa. 1978).Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).Google Scholar
Raines v. Byrd, 117 S. Ct. 2312 (1997).Google Scholar
Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952).Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
Vacco v. Quill, 117 S. Ct. 2293 (1997).Google Scholar
Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 2293 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989).Google Scholar
Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753 (1985).Google Scholar
Zurcher v. Daily Stanford, 436 U.S. 547 (1978).Google Scholar