Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:26:17.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Headscarves, Human Rights, and Harmonious Multicultural Society: Implications of the French Ban for Interpretations of Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Ellen Wiles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through the lens of the French law prohibiting Muslim headscarves in schools, this article examines the way in which societal tensions that arise in the context of religious and cultural pluralism are translated into legal discourses relating to human rights and equality. It explores the way in which the law is rooted in France's broader sociopolitical structure and history and contrasts it to the United Kingdom and Turkey. It proposes that the law is based on an anachronistic, formal interpretation of equality that is inappropriate for addressing the inevitable cultural diversity of modern French society, and through its permeation into law and policymaking more widely, it is a primary cause of the heightened social tensions involving the Muslim minority. An assessment of the legitimacy of a law that restricts minority groups' cultural practices in this way in any society should be based on a substantive interpretation of equality and should necessarily involve an active endeavor to understand the meanings of those cultural practices for those groups within their distinct context. Upon this foundation, law and policy can be developed in a way that better reconciles the pluralism of modern society with the common objectives of social harmony, stability, and tolerance.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 699 - 736
Copyright
© 2007 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Herbert Kritzer for his editorial assistance, and Stephen Guest, Colm O'Cinneide, and David Wiles for their helpful guidance and comments.

References

References

Abram, Morris B. (1986) “Affirmative Action: Fair Shakers and Social Engineers,” 99 Harvard Law Rev. 1312–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Leila (1992) Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ashfar, Haleh (1989) “Gender Roles and the ‘Moral Economy of Kin’ among Pakistani Women in West Yorkshire,” 15 New Community 2211–25.Google Scholar
Ashfar, Haleh (1998) Islam and Feminisms: An Iranian Case Study. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, et al. (1994) Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) “Structures, Habitus and Power: Basis for a Theory of Symbolic Power,” in Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon, & Jones, Peter, (eds.) (2001) Human Rights and Global Diversity. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
CEDAW (Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women) (2005) “Combined Fourth and Fifth Periodic Reports on Turkey,” http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/reports.htm (accessed 4 Dec. 2006).Google Scholar
Collins, Hugh (2003) “Discrimination, Equality, and Social Inclusion,” 66 Modern Law Rev. 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conseil, D'Etat (1989) “Quelques Grands Avis, no 346.893,” http://www.conseil-etat.fr/ce/rappor/index_ra_cg03_01.shtml (accessed 12 Dec. 2006).Google Scholar
D'Amato, Anthony (1983) “Is Equality a Totally Empty Idea?,” 81 Michigan Law Rev. 600–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
El Guindi, Fadwa (1999) Veil: Modesty, Privacy and Resistance. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Niall (2002) Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Finnis, John (1980) Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fredman, Sandra (1997) “Reversing Discrimination,” 113 Law Q. Rev. 575–600.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Göle, Nilüfer (1996) The Forbidden Modern: Civilization and Veiling. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Angela P. (1990) “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory,” 42 Stanford Law Rev. 581–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haut Conseil à l'Intégration (1996) Liens culturels et intégration: Rapport au Premier ministre, 1995. Paris: Haut Conseil à l'Intégration.Google Scholar
Haut Conseil à l'Intégration (2006) Le bilan de la politique d'intégration 2002–2005. Paris: Haut Conseil à l'Intégration.Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee (1986) Yearbook of the Human Rights Committee, Vol. II. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2004) “Memorandum to the Turkish Government on Human Rights Watch's Concerns with Regard to Academic Freedom in Higher Education, and Access to Higher Education for Women who Wear the Headscarf,” 29 June, http://hrw.org/backgrounder/eca/turkey/2004 (accessed 29 Nov. 2006).Google Scholar
Hurston, Zora Neale (1979) “How It Feels to Be Colored Me,” in Walker, A., ed., I Love Myself When I Am Laughing … and Then Again When I Am Looking Mean and Impressive: A Zora Neale Hurston Reader. Old Westbury, NY: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael (1993) Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Kallen, Evelyn (2003) Ethnicity and Human Rights in Canada, 3d ed. Toronto: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Khosrokhavar, Farhad (2004) L'Islam dans les prisons. Louvains Le Neuve, France: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will (1995) Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine (1983) “Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: Towards Feminist Jurisprudence,” 8 Signs 635–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macleod, Ann (1993) Accommodating Protest. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Margalit, Avishai, & Raz, Joseph (1990) “National Self Determination,” 87 J. of Philosophy 442–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modood, Tahir, ed. (1997) Church, State and Religious Minorities. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan (1999) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Özdalga, Elizabeth (1998) The Veiling Issue in Modern Turkey. Surrey, United Kingdom: Curzon.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bikhu (1990) “Integrating Minorities in a Multicultural Society,” in Requejo, F. & Preuss, U., eds., European Citizenship, Multiculturalism and the State. London: Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bikhu (2000) Report: The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain. London: Runnymede Trust Commission.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. (1997) Religion and Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne (2004) “Defending Equality of Outcome,” 12 J. of Political Philosophy 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer (2005) A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulter, Sebastian (1997) “Muslim Headscarves in School: Contrasting Legal Approaches in England and France,” 17 Oxford J. of Legal Studies 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1986) The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Roy, Oliver (2004) “Islam in France: Religion, Ethnic Community, or Social Ghetto?,” in Lewis, B. & Schnapper, D., eds., Muslims in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Sabeg, Yazid, & Méhaignerie, Laurence (2004) Les oubliés de l'égalité des chances: Participation, pluralité, assimilation … ou repli? Paris: Institut Montaigne.Google Scholar
Said, Edward (1979) Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Salih, Sara, ed. (2004) Judith Butler Reader. London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael (1998) Democracy's Discontent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya (2006) Identity and Violence. London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Straw, Jack (2006) “I want to unveil my views on an important issue,” Lancashire Evening Telegraph, 6 October, http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/blog/index.var.488.0.i_want_to_unveil_my_views_on_an_important_issue.php (accessed 5 Dec. 2006).Google Scholar
Talbott, William (2005) Which Rights Should be Universal? Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles et al., eds. (1992) Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Thornberry, Patrick (1991) Minorities and Human Rights Law. London: Minority Rights Group.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael (1997) On Toleration. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Westen, Peter (1982) “The Empty Idea of Equality,” 95 Harvard Law Rev. 537–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Constitutional Court of Turkey, Judgment No. 1989/12.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court of Turkey, Judgment No. 1991/8.Google Scholar
Karen Ulane v. Eastern Airlines Inc., 742 F. 2d 1081 (7th Cir.1984).Google Scholar
Leyla Şahin v. Turkey, 11 November ECHR (2005).Google Scholar
Lovelace v. Canada, Human Rights Committee, No. 24 (1977).Google Scholar
Lovelace v. Ontario, 1 S.C.R. 950 (2000).Google Scholar
R (on the application of Begum) v. Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School, UKHL 15 (2006).Google Scholar
Welfare Party Case (Refah Party v. Turkey), 13 February ECHR (2003).Google Scholar
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Canada: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982Google Scholar
Canadian Multiculturalism Act 1988Google Scholar
International: International Covenant for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Article 1(4) 1969Google Scholar
Charter of the Rights of Ethnic Minorities 1981 (Council of Europe resolution)Google Scholar
UN Declaration against Intolerance and Discrimination based on Religion or Belief 1981Google Scholar
UN Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities 1992Google Scholar
Iran: Islamic Criminal Code, Article 139Google Scholar
Turkey: Disciplinary Regulation for Students in Higher Education 1985Google Scholar
Law 3670, October 25 1990: Supplement to Article 17 of the Higher Education LawGoogle Scholar
“Hat Law” 1925Google Scholar
Law 3670 1990Google Scholar
Law Relating to Prohibited Garments 1934Google Scholar
Regulation Concerning the Dress of Students and Staff in Schools, Article 6, 1981Google Scholar