Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T12:26:26.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Class Structure and Legal Practice: Inequality and Mobility Among Toronto Lawyers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

John Hagan ,
Marie Huxter  and
Patricia Parker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can professional groups, such as lawyers, be incorporated within class analyses? Results from a Toronto survey indicate that lawyers can be usefully located within class categories operationalized in terms of power relations. The class structure of legal practice in Toronto is dominated by older, Anglo-Saxon Protestant males with degrees from Canada's elite law schools, who are practicing corporate and commercial law for predominantly corporate clients. Notwithstanding evidence of recently and substantially improved mobility prospects, we found an absence of Jewish lawyers from the capitalist class and a tendency for women to remain in a legal working class. We also discovered the emergence of a new working class in the legal profession that, perhaps unexpectedly, includes young associates in the corporate and commercial departments of large firms. The exploitation of this “professional proletariat” is as clear as are their relatively high salaries and promising prospects of sharing in the power relations that facilitate their domination and limited autonomy. We argue with qualitative data that it is the combination of high salaries, good mobility prospects, and a highly competitive environment that allows this group to be exploited with very little chance of rebellion. More generally, this kind of class analysis opens new possibilities in the comparative and historical study of lawyers and other professional groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , 1988 , pp. 9 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was made possible by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and by fellowships provided for the senior author by the Canadian Institute of Advanced Research and Statistics Canada.

References

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1986) “The Transformation of the American Legal Profession,” 20 Law & Society Review 7.Google Scholar
ABEL-SMITH, Brian, and Robert B., STEVENS (1967) Lawyers and the Courts: A Sociological Study of the English Legal System, 1750–1965. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
ADAM, Barry D., and Douglas E., BAER (1984) “The Social Mobility of Women and Men in the Ontario Legal Profession,” 21 Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALDRICH, Howard, and Jane, WEISS (1981) “Differentiation Within the United States Capitalist Class: Workforce Size and Income Differences,” 46 American Sociological Review 279.Google Scholar
ARNOWITZ, Stanley (1978) “The Professional-Managerial Class or Middle Strata,” in Walker, P. (ed.), Between Labor and Capital. Montreal: Black Rose.Google Scholar
Walker, P. (1974) False Promises: The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
ARTHURS, H. W., J., WILLMS, and L., TAMAN (1971) “The Toronto Legal Profession: An Exploratory Study,” 21 University of Toronto Law Journal 498.Google Scholar
AUERBACH, Jerold S. (1976a) “From Rags to Robes: The Legal Profession, Social Mobility and the American Jewish Experience,” 66 American Jewish Historical Quarterly 249.Google Scholar
AUERBACH, Jerold S. (1976b) Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BALBUS, Isaac (1977) “Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the ‘Relative Autonomy’ of the Law,” 11 Law & Society Review 571.Google Scholar
BELL, Daniel (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
BORDIEU, Pierre, and Luc, BOLTANSKI (1978) “Changes in Social Structure and Changes in the Demand for Education,” in Giner, S. and Archer, M. S. (eds.), Contemporary Europe: Social Structures and Cultural Patterns. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E. (1966) Lawyers' Ethics: A Survey of the New York City Bar. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E. (1962) Lawyers on Their Own: A Study of Individual Practitioners in Chicago. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
CARTWRIGHT, Bliss C. (1986) “Review of Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar” 91 American Journal of Sociology 1001.Google Scholar
CHESTER, Ronald (1985) Unequal Access: Women Lawyers in a Changing America. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
CLEMENT, Wallace (1975) The Canadian Corporate Elite: An Analysis of Economic Power. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
COLLINS, Randall (1975) Conflict Sociology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
CURRAN, Barbara (1986) “American Lawyers in the 1980s: A Profession in Transition,” 20 Law & Society Review 19.Google Scholar
DERBER, Charles (1982) Professionals as Workers: Mental Labor in Advanced Capitalism. Boston: G. K. Hall and Company.Google Scholar
EHRENREICH, Barbara, and John, EHRENREICH (1978) “The Professional-Managerial Class,” in Walker, P. (ed.), Between Labor and Capital. Montreal: Black Rose.Google Scholar
EPSTEIN, Cynthia Fuchs (1981) Women in Law. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
ERLANGER, Howard (1980) “The Allocation of Status Within Occupations: The Case of the Legal Profession,” 58 Social Forces 882.Google Scholar
FINANCIAL POST (1984) Directory of Directors. Toronto: Maclean-Hunter.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1983) “Mega-Law and Mega-Lawyering in the Contemporary United States,” in Dingwall, R. and Lewis, P. (eds.), The Sociology of the Professions. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
GLAZER, Nathan (1979) “Lawyers and the New Class,” in Briggs, B. B. (ed.), The New Class? New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
GOULDNER, Alvin (1979) The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. New York: Seabury Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRABB, Edward (1984) Social Inequality: Classical and Contemporary Theorists. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
HABERMAN, S. J. (1978) Analysis of Qualitative Data, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John, and Celesta, ALBONETTI (1982) “Race, Class, and the Perception of Criminal Injustice in America,” 88 American Journal of Sociology 329.Google Scholar
HALLIDAY, Terence (1986) “Six Score Years and Ten: Demographic Transitions in the American Legal Profession, 1850–1980,” 20 Law & Society Review 53.Google Scholar
HEINZ, John P., and Edward O., LAUMANN (1982) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN, Paul (1982) Lions of the Eighties. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar
JOHNSTONE, Quintin, and Dan, HOPSON Jr. (1967) Lawyers and Their Work: An Analysis of the Legal Profession in the United States and England. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
LADINSKY, Jack (1963) “Careers of Lawyers, Law Practice, and Legal Institutions,” 28 American Sociological Review 47.Google Scholar
LARSON, Magali Sarfatti (1980) “Proletarianization and Educated Labor,” 9 Theory and Society 131.Google Scholar
LARSON, Magali Sarfatti (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LIPSET, Seymour M. (1968) Revolution and Counterrevolution: Change and Persistence in Social Structures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
MACHLOWITZ, Marilyn (1980) “Newest Drug: Work,” Vogue (March).Google Scholar
MARX, Karl (1954) Capital, Vol. 3. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
MILLS, C. Wright (1976) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MILLS, C. Wright (1951) White Collar: The American Middle Classes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
NELSON, Robert L. (1983) “The Changing Structure of Opportunity: Recruitment and Careers in Large Law Firms,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 109.Google Scholar
NIOSI, Jorge (1978) The Economy of Canada. Montreal: Black Rose.Google Scholar
OPPENHEIMER, Martin (1975) “The Unionization of the Professional,” Social Policy.Google Scholar
OPPENHEIMER, Martin (1970) “White Collar Revisited: The Making of a New Working Class,” 5 Social Policy 34.Google Scholar
OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL (1967) Study of 1960 Osgoode Hall Graduates in the City of Toronto. Interim Report. Toronto.Google Scholar
PARSONS, Talcott (1968) “Professions,” in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 12.Google Scholar
PORTER, John (1965) The Vertical Mosaic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRESTUS, Robert (1973) Elite Accommodation in Canadian Politics. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, Robert (1984) “Reproducing Class Relations in Industrial Capitalism,” 49 American Sociological Review 182.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, Robert, and Maurice, GARNIER (1985) “Class Reproduction among Men and Women in France: Reproduction Theory on Its Home Ground,” 91 American Journal of Sociology 250.Google Scholar
RUESCHEMEYER, Dietrich (1973) Lawyers and Their Society: A Comparative Study of the Legal Profession in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SILBERMAN, Charles E. (1985) A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
SMIGEL, Erwin O. (1969) “The Wall Street Lawyer Reconsidered,” New York 36 (August 18).Google Scholar
SMIGEL, Erwin O. (1964) The Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organization Man? Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
SPANGLER, Eve (1986) Lawyers for Hire: Salaried Professionals at Work. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
SPECTOR, Malcolm (1972) “The Rise and Fall of a Mobility Route,” 20 Social Problems 173.Google Scholar
STEWART, James B. (1983) The Partners: Inside America's Most Powerful Law Firms. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
STOLZENBERG, Ross (1979) “The Measurement and Decomposition of Causal Effects in Nonlinear and Nonaddictive Models.” In K. Schuessler (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1980. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
SWAINE, Robert T. (1948) The Cravath Firm and Its Predecessors, 1819–1948. New York: Ad Press.Google Scholar
WEBER, Max (1968) Economy and Society. In Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich (ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
WHITE, James J. (1967) “Women in Law,” 65 Michigan Law Review 1051.Google Scholar
WOOD, Arthur (1967) Criminal Lawyer. New Haven: College and University Press.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, Erik O. (1982) “The American Class Structure,” 47 American Sociological Review 709.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, Erik O. (1985) Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, Erik O. and Joachim, SINGELMANN (1982) “Proletarianization in the Changing American Class Structure,” 88 (supplement) American Journal of Sociology 1765.Google Scholar
YALE LAW JOURNAL (1964) “The Jewish Law Student and New York Jobs—Discriminatory Effects in Law Firm Hiring Practices.” 73 Notes and Comments 625.Google Scholar
ZANDER, Michael (1968) Lawyers and the Public Interest: A Study in Restrictive Practices. London: Weidenfeld and Nocholson.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar (421 U.S. 773).Google Scholar