Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:28:21.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Swaying the Hand of Justice: The Internal and External Dynamics of Regime Change at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This article develops a conflict approach for studying the field of international criminal law. Focusing on the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, we draw on Burawoy's (2003) elaboration of reflexive ethnography to determine how external political changes affect the work of an international legal institution. We explore how political frameworks of legal liberalism, ad hoc legalism, and legal exceptionalism result in internal office, organizational, and normative changes within this Tribunal, thereby linking national political transformations with the construction of the global. Drawing on rolling field interviews and a two-wave panel survey, we conclude that the claims to universals that underwrite transnational legal fields cannot be understood solely through an analysis of external political forces, but must be combined with attention to how these are refracted through internal organizational change within international institutions.

Type
Forum: Law Between the Global and the Local
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, Karen. 2004. Agents or Trustees? International Courts in their Political Context. (November 15, 2004). TranState Working Paper No. 8. http://ssrn.com/abstract=622222.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2006. Delegation to International Courts and the Limits of Recontracting Political Power. In Delegation under Anarchy, ed. Hawkins, Darren, Neilson, Daniel, Tierney, Michael J., and Lake, David A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
American Society of International Law. 2005. Alternative Perspectives on the Independence of International Tribunals. American Society of International Law Proceedings.Google Scholar
Arenella, Peter. 1983. Rethinking the Functions of Criminal Procedure: The Warren and Burger Courts’ Competing Ideologies. Georgetown Law Journal 72:185248.Google Scholar
Barber, Ben. 2002. U.S. Calls U.N. Tribunals Wasteful, Wants Them Closed. Washington Times, March 1, A1.Google Scholar
Bass, Gary. 2000. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Bassiouni, Cherif. 1974. An Appraisal of the Growth and Developing Trends of International Criminal Law. Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal 45:405–33.Google Scholar
Bennett, Rosemary, and Hoyos, Carola. 2002. US Launches Campaign to Close UN Criminal Tribunals. Financial Times, March 1, 10.Google Scholar
Black, Donald. 1973. The Mobilization of Law. Journal of Legal Studies 2:125–49.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal 38:805–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc. 1999. On the Cunning of Imperialist Reason. Theory, Culture & Society 16:4158.Google Scholar
Buncombe, Andrew. 2002. Balkans: US Ambassador Attacks Expense and Professionalism of War Crimes Tribunals. The Independent, March 1, 2.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael. 2003. Revisits: An Outline of a Theory of Reflexive Ethnography. American Sociological Review 68:645–79.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Chambliss, William. 1964. A Sociological Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy. Social Problems 12:6777.Google Scholar
Chambliss, William. 1974. The State, the Law and the Definition of Behavior as Criminal or Delinquent. In Handbook of Criminology, ed. Glaser, Daniel. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Chambliss, William, and Seidman, Robert. 1971. Law, Order, and Power. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 2004. The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron. 1968. The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Clinton, William Jefferson. 1997. Statement by the President on Apprehension of Indicted War Criminal Slavko Dokmanovic. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, June 28.Google Scholar
Combs, Nancy. 2002. Copping a Plea to Genocide: The Plea Bargaining of International Crimes. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151:1157.Google Scholar
Crossette, Barbara. 2002. War Crimes Tribunal Becomes Reality, Without U.S. Role. New York Times, April 12, A3.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves. 1986. From Mediation to Pure Law: Practice and Scholarly Representation within the Legal Sphere. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 14:89107.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2000. Human Rights from the Cold War to Kosovo: Constructing New Universals Within Hegemonic Battles. Chicago: American Bar Foundation Working Paper #2028.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant, eds. 2001. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Dixon, Jo. 1995. The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing. American Journal of Sociology 100:1157–98.Google Scholar
Doyle, Leonard. 1997. War Crimes Suspect Held. The Observer, June 29, 4.Google Scholar
Ellis, Mark. 2004. Coming to Terms with Its Past—Serbia's New Court for the Prosecution of War Crimes. Berkeley Journal of International Law 22:165–94.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert. 1969. Judging Delinquents: Context and Process in Juvenile Court. Chicago: Aldine. Google Scholar
Eskridge, William. 2002. Some Effects of Identity-Based Social Movements on Constitutional Law in the Twentieth Century. Michigan Law Review 100:20622407.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1979. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm, and Simon, Jonathan. 1992. The New Penology: Noted on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications. Criminology 30:449–74.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2004. OSCE Urges More Training for Croatian War Crimes Judges. August 20.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant. 2003. Law and Society as Law and Development. Law and Society Review 37:305–14.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant, and Sterling, Joyce. 1998. From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State. Law and Society Review 32:409–71.Google Scholar
Glueck, Sheldon. 1944. War Criminals: Their Prosecution and Punishment. New York: Knopf. Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. 2005. The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and the Politics of Global Order. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar
Hagan, John. 1989. Structural Criminology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar
Hagan, John. 2003. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Hagan, John, and Levi, Ron. 2004. Social Skill, the Milosevic Indictment, and the Rebirth of International Criminal Justice. European Journal of Criminology 1:445–75.Google Scholar
Hagan, John, and Levi, Ron. 2005. Crimes of War and the Force of Law. Social Forces 83:14991534.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas. 1975. Property, Authority and the Criminal Law. In Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth Century England, ed. Hay, Douglas. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Heckman, James. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 45:153–61.Google Scholar
Helsinki, Watch. 1992-1993. War-Crimes in Bosnia-Hercegovina. 2 vols., written by Nizich, Ivana. New York: Human Rights Watch. Google Scholar
Helsinki, Watch. 1993. Prosecute Now! Helsinki Watch Releases Eight Cases for War Crimes Tribunal on Former Yugoslavia. Helsinki Watch Report. New York: Human Rights Watch. Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2002. U.S. Remarks Undermine War Crime Trials. Press Release, February 28.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2004. Croatia: Conviction Spotlights Justice Failings. Press Release, July 19.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 1945. Opening Address for the United States (November 21, 1945). In Marrus, Michael. 1997. The Nuremberg War Crimes Trial, 1945–46: A Documentary History, 7983. Boston: Bedford Books. Google Scholar
Jenness, Valerie. 2004. Explaining Criminalization: From Demography and Status Politics to Globalization and Modernization. Annual Review of Sociology 30:147–71.Google Scholar
Jenness, Valerie, and Grattet, Ryken. 2001. Making Hate a Crime: From Social Movement to Law Enforcement. New York: Russell Sage. Google Scholar
Judah, Tim. 2002. The Star of the Hague. New York Review of Books 49 (7):3739.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Kelemen, Michele. 2002. Bush administration efforts to influence international criminal tribunals. National Public Radio, “All Things Considered,” March 6.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2004. International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17:197218.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2002. La fabrique du droit: une ethnographie du Conseil d'Etat. Paris: La Découverte. Google Scholar
Leman-Langlois, Stephane. 2002. Constructing a Common Language: the Function of Nuremberg in the Problematization of Postapartheid Justice. Law and Social Inquiry 27:79102.Google Scholar
Lippman, Thomas. 1998. America Avoids the Stand: Why the U.S. Objects to a World Criminal Court. Washington Post, July 26, C1.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 2004. International Decision: Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza, & Ngeze. American Journal of International Law 98:325–30.Google Scholar
Mandel, Michael. 2004. How America Gets Away With Murder: Illegal Wars, Collateral Damage and Crimes Against Humanity. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press. Google Scholar
Mathews, Jessica. 1997. Power Shift. Foreign Affairs 76:5066.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, John McCarthy, and Zald, Mayer, eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Mégrét, Frédéric. 2001. Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court's Third-Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law. European Journal of International Law 12:247–68.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. 1998. War Crimes Law Comes of Age: Essays. Oxford: Clarendon. Google Scholar
Meyer, John. 1987. The World Polity and the Authority of the Nation State. In Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual, ed. Thomas, George, Meyer, John, Ramirez, Franco, and Boli, John. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
NBC News. 1998. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright Discusses Her Visit to Ohio to Get Support from American People for Military Action Against Iraq. Today, February 19.Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh. 1998. War Crimes: Brutality, Genocide, Terror, and the Struggle for Justice. New York: Times Books. Google Scholar
Neier, Aryeh. 2003. Taking Liberties: Four Decades in the Struggle for Rights. New York: Public Affairs. Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert. 1981. Practice and Privilege: Social Change and the Structure of Large Law Firms. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 6:95140.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2002. U.S. Official Backs War-Crime Tribunal. March 7, A9.Google Scholar
Office of the Prosecutor. 2002. Address by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, Mrs. Carla Del Ponte, to the United Nations Security Council. The Hague. 30 October. Document Number JJJ/P.I.S./709-e.Google Scholar
Office of the Prosecutor. 2004. Address by Carla Del Ponte, Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, to the United Nations Security Council. The Hague. 30 June. Document Number CT/P.I.S./863-e.Google Scholar
Parenti, Michael. 2000. To Kill a Nation: The Attack on Yugoslavia. New York: Verso. Google Scholar
Pettit, Becky, and Western, Bruce. 2004. Mass Imprisonment and the Life Course: Race and Class Inequality in U.S. Incarceration. American Sociological Review 69:151–69.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric, and De Figueiredo, Miguel. 2004. Is the International Court of Justice Biased? (December 2004). U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 234. http://ssrn.com/abstract=642581.Google Scholar
Prosper, Pierre Richard. 2002. The U.N. Criminal Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda: International Justice or Show of Justice? Statement of the Honorable Pierre-Richard Prosper, Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues, United States Department of State, Before the Committee on International Relations, United States House of Representatives. February 28.Google Scholar
Quinney, Richard. 1970. The Problem of Crime. New York: Dodd, Mead. Google Scholar
Reiss, Albert. 1974. Citizen Access to Criminal Justice. British Journal of Law and Society 1:5074.Google Scholar
Reuters. 1997. U.N. Aids War Crimes Tribunal in Croatia Arrest. International Herald Tribune. June 2829.Google Scholar
Richter, Paul. 2002. Scrap War Crimes Tribunals by ’08, White House Says. Los Angeles Times, March 1, A3.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2000. The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Robertson, Geoffrey. 1999. Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice. London: Penguin. Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward. 2001. Passing Through the Door: Social Movement Literature and Legal Scholarship. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150:183.Google Scholar
Sadat, Leila, and Carden, Richard. 2000. The New International Criminal Court: An Uneasy Revolution. Georgetown Law Journal 88:381474.Google Scholar
Schabas, William. 2001. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael. 1997. Balkan Justice: The Story Behind the First International War Crimes Trial Since Nuremberg. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press. Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael. 2000. The Tools for Enforcing International Criminal Justice in the New Millennium: Lessons from the Yugoslavia Tribunal. DePaul Law Review 49:925–79.Google Scholar
Scheffer, David. 1998. The Clear and Present Danger of War Crimes. Department of State Dispatch. March 19.Google Scholar
Sellin, Thorsten. 1938. Culture Conflict and Crime: A Report of the Subcommittee on Delinquency of the Committee on Personality and Culture. New York: Social Science Research Council. Google Scholar
Sewell, William. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98:129.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 2002. Mutual Engagement: Criminology and the Sociology of Law. Crime, Law and Social Change 37:163–75.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 1993. Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Simons, Marlise. 2005. Court on Crimes in Former Yugoslavia Hits Its Stride. New York Times, May 15, 3.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1997. The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs 76:183–97.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. Breaking Out: The Proliferation of Actors in the International System. In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, ed. Garth, Bryant and Dezalay, Yves. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sudnow, David. 1965. Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office. Social Problems 12:255–76.Google Scholar
Sugarman, David. 2002. From Unimaginable to Possible: Spain, Pinochet and the Judicialization of Power. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies 3:107–24.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Edwin. 1956. The Sutherland Papers, Cohen, Albert, Lindesmith, Alfred, and Schuessler, Karl, eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward Palmer. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. London: Allen Lane. Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 2000. Framing the Field of Law's Disciplinary Encounters: A Historical Narrative. Law and Society Review 34:911–72.Google Scholar
Turk, Austin. 1969. Criminality and Legal Order. Chicago: Rand McNally. Google Scholar
Turk, Austin. 1982. Political Criminality: The Defiance and Defense of Authority. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Turner, Craig. 1998. Why U.S. Has Decided to Make Its Case Outside Global Court. Los Angeles Times, July 19, 19.Google Scholar
United Nations Information Service. 2002a. General Assembly President Says Permanent International Criminal Court Will Provide Much Stronger Deterrence than Ad Hoc Tribunals. GA/SM/282, 12 April.Google Scholar
United Nations Information Service. 2002b. International Criminal Court to Be Established. Note No. 5725, 10 April.Google Scholar
Vold, George. 1958. Theoretical Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 1999. “Suitable Enemies”: Foreigners and Immigrants in the Prisons of Europe. Punishment and Society 1:215–22.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2001. Deadly Symbiosis: When Ghetto and Prison Meet and Mesh. Punishment and Society 3:95134.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2003. Toward a Dictatorship over the Poor? Notes on the Penalization of Poverty in Brazil. Punishment and Society 5:197205.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. and eds. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth. 1995. Prosecuting War Crimes. Military Law Review 149:217–27.Google Scholar
Whyte, William Foote. 1943. Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara. 1993. Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar