Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T09:56:59.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Right to Privacy Is Political: Power, the Boundary Between Public and Private, and Sexual Harassment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This paper concerns the relationship between power and the ability to defend the night of privacy. The discourse of public and private spheres has shifted historically, engendering arbitrary and changing legal and cultural definitions of the boundary between public and private. Historic specifications of this boundary have become untenable as increasing numbers of women entered the paid labor force. Recent formulations define the boundary of privacy as an area within each individual's life. However, greater social power increases the ability to protect personal privacy because it offers the ability to define and protect the “private” from scrutiny.

After outlining the history of the shifting public/private boundary, this argument is applied to sexual harassment. Explicitly sexual types of harassment are related to the public/private boundary in two ways. First, they challenge the boundary itself, representing the occurrence of “private” conduct in the “public” sphere of work and education. Second, sexual harassment reveals the importance of social power in defining and defending one's privacy. Sexual harassment represents the extreme on a continuum of communication patterns between status unequals, and an invasion of the sexual privacy of the target.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barr, Paula A. 1993. Perceptions of Sexual Harassment. Sociological Inquiry 63:460–70.Google Scholar
Benson, Donna J., and Thomson, Gregg E. 1982. Sexual Harassment on a University Campus: The Confluence of Authority Relations, Sexual Interest and Gender Stratification. Social Problems 29:236–51.Google Scholar
Browne, Angela. 1987. When Battered Women Kill. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1984. Femininity. New York: Linden Press.Google Scholar
Carton, Barbara. 1994 Muscled Out? At Jenny Craig, Men Are Ones Who Claim Sex Discrimination: Workers Say Female Bosses Made Lewd Comments and Denied Promotions. Wall Street Journal, 29 November, A1, A11.Google Scholar
Cohen, Aaron Groff, and Gutek, Barbara. 1985. Dimensions of Perceptions of Social-Sexual Behavior in a Work Setting. Sex Roles 13:317–27.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis, Mike. 1990. City of Quartz. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Dixon, Jo. 1991. Feminist Reforms of Sexual Coercion Laws. In Sexual Coercion: A Sourcebook on Its Nature, Causes, and Prevention, ed. Grauerholz, Elizabeth and Koralewski, Mary A., pp. 161–71. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fain, Terri C, and Anderton, Douglas L. 1987. Sexual Harassment: Organizational Context and Diffuse Status. Sex Roles 17:291311.Google Scholar
Ferraro, Kathleen J. 1997. Battered Women: Strategies for Survival. In Violence between Intimate Partners: Patterns, Causes and Effects, ed. Cardarclli, Albert. Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn & Bacon. Cardarelli 1997.Google Scholar
Finley, Lucinda M. 1986. Transcending Equality Theory: A Way Out of the Maternity and the Workplace Debate. In Weisberg 1993, pp. 190207. First published in Columbia Law Review 1986:1118.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Glick, Peter. 1995. Ambivalence and Stereotypes Cause Sexual Harassment: A Theory with Implications for Organizational Change. Journal of Social Issues 51:97115.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., Weitzman, Lauren M., Gold, Yael, and Omerod, Mimi. 1988. Academic Harassment: Sex and Denial in Scholarly Garb. Psychology of Women Quarterly 12:320–40.Google Scholar
Foreit, K. G., Agor, T., Byers, J., Larue, Lokey H., Palazzini, M., Patterson, M., and Smith, L. 1980. Sex Bias in the Newspaper Treatment of Male-Centered and Female-Centered News Stories. Sex Roles 6:475–80.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. Sex, Lies and the Public Sphere: Some Reflections on the Confirmation of Clarence Thomas. Critical Inquiry 18:595612.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 1989. Women: A Feminist Perspective. Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Gelfand, Michele J., Fitzgerald, Louise F., and Drasgow, Fritz. 1995. The Structure of Sexual Harassment: A Confirmatory Analysis Across Cultures and Settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior 47:164–77.Google Scholar
Glass, Becky L. 1988. Workplace Harassment and the Victimization of Women. Women's Studies International Forum 11:5567.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Leslie Friedman. 1988. The Constitutional Rights of Women. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Goode, William J. 1982. Why Men Resist. In Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions, ed. Thorne, Barrie with Yalom, Marilyn, pp. 131–50. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Gruber, James E. 1992. A Typology of Personal and Environmental Sexual Harassment: Research and Policy Implications for the 1990s. Sex Roles 26:447–64.Google Scholar
Gruber, James E., and Bjorn, Lars. 1986. Women's Responses to Sexual Harassment: An Analysis of Sociocultural, Organizational, and Personal Resource Models. Social Science Quarterly 67 (Dec): 814–26.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara. 1985. Sex and the Workplace. San Francisco, California: Joey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara A., and Morasch, Bruce. 1982. Sex-Ratios, Sex-Role Spillover, and Sexual Harassment of Women at Work. Journal of Social Issues 38 (4):5574.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara Morasch, Bruce, and Cohen, Aaron Groff. 1983. Interpreting Social-Sexual Behavior in a Work Setting. Journal of Vocational Behavior 22:3048.Google Scholar
Henley, Nancy, and Freeman, Jo. 1989. The Sexual Politics of Interpersonal Behavior. In Freeman 1989, pp. 457–69.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, Joan. 1991. Law, Gender, and Injustice: A Legal History of U.S. Women. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1992. Selling Hot Pussy. In Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Cathryn. 1993. Gender and Formal Authority. Social Psychology Quarterly 56(3):193210.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kemp, Alice Abel. 1994. Women's Work: Degraded and Devalued. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, Catherine. 1993. Leaving Abusive Partners. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lacour, Claudia Brodsky. 1992. Doing Things with Words: “Racism” as Speech Act and the Undoing of Justice. In Morrison 1992, pp. 127–57.Google Scholar
Lehman, Edward W. 1977. Political Society: A Macrosociology of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Anne, and Paludi, Michele. 1997. Workplace Sexual Harassment. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lipman-Blumen, Jean. 1984. Gender Roles and Power. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Livingston, Joy A. 1982. Responses to Sexual Harassment on the Job: Legal, Organizational, and Individual Actions. Journal of Social Issues 38(4):522.Google Scholar
Lonsway, Kimberly, and Fitzgerald, Louise F. 1994. Rape Myths. Psychology of Women Quarterly 18(2):133–64.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1979. Sexual Harassment of Working Women. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Susan Ehrlich. 1989. Sexual Harassment: The Link Joining Gender Stratification, Sexuality, and Women's Economic Status. In Freeman 1989, pp. 5775.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Peggy. 1988. White Privilege and Male Privilege. In Gender Basics: Feminist Perspectives on Women and Men, ed. Minas, Anne, pp. 3038. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni, ed. 1992. Race-ing Justice, En-gendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Murrell, Audrey J., and Dietz-Uhler, Beth L. 1993. Gender Identity and Adversarial Sexual Beliefs as Predictors of Attitudes Toward Sexual Harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly 17:169–75.Google Scholar
Murrell, Audrey J., Olson, Josephine E., and Hanson Frieze, Irene. 1995. Sexual Harassment and Gender Discrimination: A Longitudinal Study of Women Managers. Journal of Social issues 51 (spring): 139–49.Google Scholar
Nieva, Veronica F., and Gutek, Barbara A. 1981. Women and Work: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Polan, Diane. 1993. Toward a Theory of Law and Patriarchy. In Weisberg 1993, pp. 419–26.Google Scholar
Pryor, John. 1987. Sexual Harassment Proclivities in Men. Sex Roles 17:269–90.Google Scholar
Renzetti, Claire M., and Curran, Daniel J. 1995. Women, Men, and Society. 3d ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L. 1989. Justice and Gender: Sex Discrimination and the Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Beth E. 1991. Put Up and Shut Up: Workplace Sexual Assaults. Gender and Society 5:533–48.Google Scholar
Schur, Edwin. 1984. Labeling Women Deviant: Gender, Stigma and Social Control. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol. 1989. Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, Sara E. 1992. Further Effects of Role Versus Gender on Interpersonal Sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(1):154–58.Google Scholar
Summers, Russel J. 1991. Determinants of Judgments of and Responses to a Complaint of Sexual Harassment. Sex Roles 25 (Oct): 379–92.Google Scholar
Tangri, Sandra S., Burt, Martha R., and Johnson, Leanor B. 1982. Sexual Harassment at Work: Three Explanatory Models. Journal of Social Issues 38 (winter): 3354.Google Scholar
Till, F. J. 1980. Sexual Harassment: A Report on the Sexual Harassment of Students. Washington, D.C.: National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs.Google Scholar
Tilly, Louise A., and Scott, Joan W. 1978. Women, Work and Family. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Uchida, Aki. 1992. When “Difference” Is “Dominance”: A Critique of the “Anti-Power-Based” Cultural Approach to Sex Differences. Language in Society 21(4):547–68.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1947. The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology. In Max Weber: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, ed. with an introduction by Talcott Parsons, trans. Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott, pp. 87157. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Elaine Lunsford, Boles, Jacaueline M., Garbin, Albeno P., and Blount, John. 1986. The Transformation of Sexual Harassment from a Private Trouble into a Public Issue. Sociological Inquiry 56:432–55.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Kelly D., ed. 1993. Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Naomi. 1991. The Beauty Myth. Toronto: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Wood, Julia T. 1993. Naming and Interpreting Sexual Harassment: A Conceptual Framework for Scholarship. In Sexual Harassment: Communication Implications, ed. Kreps, Gary L., pp. 926. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Wrong, Dennis H. 1995. Power: Its Forms, Bases, and Uses. 3d ed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar