Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:26:01.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidents, Political Regimes, and Contentious Supreme Court Nominations: A Historical Institutional Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Kevin J. McMahon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Before the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito, scholars consistently pointed to the presence of divided government as an underlying reason for conflict in the confirmation process for U.S. Supreme Court nominees. However, the importance of party unity and coalition-building appointments—each of which highlights the role of the president in the process—should not be underestimated in these confirmation battles. Moreover, an examination of the sixty twentieth-century nominations reveals that a presidency-focused political regimes model provides significant explanatory force for understanding when and what types of nominees are likely to face the most resistance in the Senate. It does so by incorporating Stephen Skowronek's analytical framework for understanding presidential authority to explain how and why different periods of political time affect presidential attempts to shape the U.S. Supreme Court through appointments. In turn, the model places recent conflict in the confirmation process in historical context.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , Fall 2007 , pp. 919 - 954
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Henry J. 1999. Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of the U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Clinton. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. 1988. Essays on the Supreme Court Appointment Process: Transformative Appointments. Harvard Law Review 101:1164–84.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. 1998. We the People: Volume II, Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Lauren Cohen. 2002. Warring Factions: Interest Groups, Money, and the New Politics of Senate Confirmation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Berke, Richard L. 1991. Senators Who Switched Tell of Political Torment. New York Times, October 16, at A19.Google Scholar
Biskupic, Joan. 2005. Sandra Day O'Connor: How the First Woman on the Supreme Court Became Its Most Influential Justice. New York: Ecco/Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blaustein, Albert P., and Mersky, Roy M. 1978. The First One Hundred Justices: Statistical Studies on the Supreme Court of the United States. Hamden, CT: Shoe String Press, Archon Books.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R., and Fleisher, Richard, eds. 2000. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Bronner, Ethan. 1989. Battle for Justice: How the Bork Nomination Shook America. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., Cover, Albert D., and Segal, Jeffrey A. 1990. Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model. American Political Science Review 84:525–34.Google Scholar
Carter, Stephen L. 1995. The Confirmation Mess: Cleaning Up the Federal Appointments Process. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W., and Gillman, Howard, eds. 1999. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W., and May, David. 1999. A Political Regimes Approach to the Analysis of Legal Decisions. Polity 32:233–52.Google Scholar
Comiskey, Michael. 2004. Seeking Justices: The Judging of Supreme Court Nominees. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker. Journal of Public Law 6:279–95.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Segal, Jeffrey A., Spaeth, Harold J., and Walker, Thomas G. 1994. The Supreme Court Compendium: Data, Decisions, and Developments. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Friedman, Richard D. 1983. The Transformation in the Senate Response to Supreme Court Nominations: From Reconstruction to the Taft Administration and Beyond. Cardozo Law Review 5:1–95.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard, and Clayton, Cornell, eds. 1999. The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2002. How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875–1891. American Political Science Review 96:511–24.Google Scholar
Gitenstein, Mark. 1992. Matters of Principle: An Insider's Account of America's Rejection of Robert Bork's Nomination to the Supreme Court. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Goings, Kenneth W. 1990. The NAACP Comes of Age: The Defeat of Judge John J. Parker. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon. 1997. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection From Roosevelt Through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1993. The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7:35–73.Google Scholar
Graham, Fred P. 1968. Johnson Appoints Fortas to Head Supreme Court; Thornberry to Be Justice. New York Times, June 27, 1968, at 1.Google Scholar
Harrison, Robert. 1987. The Breakup of the Roosevelt Court: The Contribution of History and Biography. PhD diss., Department of History, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1990. Abe Fortas: A Biography. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E. 1995. The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maltese, John Anthony. 1995. The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Massaro, John. 1990. Supremely Political: The Role of Ideology and Presidential Management in Unsuccessful Supreme Court Nominations. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Jane, and Abramson, Jill. 1994. Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
McCune, Wesley. 1947. The Nine Young Men. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
McHargue, Daniel S. 1950. President Taft's Appointments to the Supreme Court. Journal of Politics 12:478–510.Google Scholar
McMahon, Kevin J. 2000. Constitutional Vision and Supreme Court Decisions: Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race. Studies in American Political Development 14:20–50.Google Scholar
McMahon, Kevin J. 2004. Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Road to Brown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moraski, Byron J., and Shipman, Charles R. 1999. The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices. American Journal of Political Science 43:1069–95.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. In Search of American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, Henschen, Beth M., Walsh, Michael H., and Strauss, Julie. 1992. Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas. American Political Science Review 86:997–1003.Google Scholar
Patterson, James T. 1997. Congressional Conservatism and the New Deal: The Growth of the Conservative Coalition in Congress, 1933–1939. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Peretti, Terri Jennings. 1999. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, H. W. Jr., and Powe, L. A. Jr. 2004. The Political Battle for the Constitution. Constitutional Commentary 21:641–96.Google Scholar
Posner, Gerald. 1996. Citizen Perot: His Life and Times. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Powe, Lucas A. Jr. 2000. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Presidential Elections, 1789–1996. 1999. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Roberts, Steven V. 1987. White House Says Bork Lacks Votes for Confirmation. New York Times, September 26, at A1.Google Scholar
Ruckman, P. S. Jr. 1993. The Supreme Court, Critical Nominations, and the Senate Confirmation Process. The Journal of Politics 55:793–805.Google Scholar
Scherer, Nancy. 2005. Scoring Points: Politicians, Activists, and the Lower Federal Court Appointment Process. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scigliano, Robert. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1987. Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices: Partisan and Institutional Politics. Journal of Politics 49:998–1015.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cover, Albert D. 1989. Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. American Political Science Review 83:557–65.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Epstein, Lee, Cameron, Charles M., and Spaeth, Harold. 1995. Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited. Journal of Politics 57:812–23.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Mark. 1994. Judicious Choices: The New Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 2005. Leadership by Definition: First Term Reflections on George W. Bush's Political Stance. Perspectives on Politics 3:817–31.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Clay Jr. 1993. Bloody Crossroads: African American the Bork Nomination: A Bibliographic Essay. Harvard BlackLetter Journal 10:133–47.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1988. Political Jurisprudence, the “New Institutionalism,” and the Future of Public Law. American Political Science Review 82:89–108.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1992. If Politics Matters: Implications for a “New Institutionalism.” Studies in American Political Development 6:1–36.Google Scholar
Stolberg, Sheryl Gay, and Kirkpatrick, David D. 2005. Top Democrat Says He'll Vote No on Roberts. New York Times, September 21, at 1.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2003. The New Constitutional Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Congressional Record. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Watson, George L., and Stookey, John A. 1995. Shaping America: The Politics of Supreme Court Appointments. New York: Longman Publishers.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 2001a. Presidential Challenges to Judicial Supremacy and the Politics of Constitutional Meaning. Polity 33:365–95.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 2001b. The Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy. In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance and Change, ed. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yalof, David Alistair. 1999. Pursuit of Justices: Presidential Politics and the Selection of Supreme Court Nominees. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar