Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Institutionalization of Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

  • Paul M. Collins and Lori A. Ringhand


This article uses an original database of confirmation hearing dialogue to examine how the Senate Judiciary Committee's role in Supreme Court confirmations has changed over time, with particular attention paid to the 1939–2010 era. During this period, several notable developments took place, including a rise in the number of hearing comments, increased attention to nominees’ views of judicial decisions, an expansion of the scope of issues addressed, and the equalization of questioning between majority and minority party senators. We demonstrate that these changes were shaped by both endogenous and exogenous factors to promote the legitimization of the Judiciary Committee's role in the confirmation process and to foster the instrumental goals of senators. This research contributes to our understanding of the development of political institutions, interbranch interactions, and how institutional change affects the behavior of legal and political actors.



Hide All
Abraham, Henry J. 2008. Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Bush II. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Batta, Anna, Collins, Paul M. Jr., Miles, Tom, and Ringhand, Lori A. 2012. Let's Talk: Judicial Decisions at Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings. Judicature 96 (1): 715.
Baumgartner, Frank, and Jones, Bryan. 2013. Policy Agendas Project. (accessed January 15, 2013).
Beth, Richard S., and Palmer, Betsy. 2011. Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789–2011. CRS Report for Congress, March 11.
Bybee, Keith. 2011. Will the Real Elena Kagan Please Stand Up? Conflicting Public Images in the Supreme Court Confirmation Process. Wake Forest Journal of Law & Policy 1 (1): 137–55.
C‐SPAN. 2005. Homepage.‐ November 6, 2014).
Cameron, Charles M., Kastellec, Jonathan P., and Park, Jee‐Kwang. 2013. Voting for Justices: Change and Continuity in Confirmation Voting, 1937–2010. Journal of Politics 75 (2): 283–99.
Carter, Stephen L. 1994. The Confirmation Mess: Cleaning Up the Federal Appointments Process. New York: Basic Books.
Collins, Paul M. Jr., and Ringhand, Lori A. 2013. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Comiskey, Michael. 1999. Not Guilty: The News Media in the Supreme Court Confirmation Process. Journal of Law & Politics 15 (1): 136.
Crowe, Justin. 2012. Building the Judiciary: Law, Courts, and the Politics of Institutional Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dancey, Logan, Nelson, Kjersten R., and Ringsmuth, Eve M. 2011. “Strict Scrutiny?” The Content of Senate Judicial Confirmation Hearings During the George W. Bush Administration. Judicature 95 (3): 126–35.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2009. Justice Sotomayor: The Unjust Hearings. New York Review of Books, September 24.
Egerton, John. 1995. Speak Now Against the Day: The Generation Before the Civil Rights Movement in the South. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Eisgruber, Christopher L. 2007. The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A. 2000. Measuring Issue Salience. American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 6683.
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A. 2005. Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. New York: Oxford University Press.
Farganis, Dion, and Wedeking, Justin. 2011. “No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews”: An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Nominee Candor from Harlan to Kagan. Law & Society Review 45 (3): 525–59.
Farganis, Dion, and Wedeking, Justin. 2014. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings in the U.S. Senate: Reconsidering the Charade. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1962. The House Appropriations Committee as a Political System: The Problem of Integration. American Political Science Review 56 (2): 310–24.
Fischer, Claude S. 2011. Made in America: A Social History of American Culture and Character. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gamm, Gerald, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1989. Emergence of Legislative Institutions: Standing Committees in the House and Senate, 1810–1825. Legislative Studies Quarterly 14 (1): 3966.
Gerhardt, Michael J. 2006. Super Precedent. Minnesota Law Review 90 (5): 1204–31.
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gimpel, James G., and Wolpert, Robin M. 1996. Opinion‐Holding and Public Attitudes Toward Controversial Supreme Court Nominees. Political Research Quarterly 49 (1): 163–76.
Goldman, Sheldon. 1997. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt Through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (5): 936–57.
Hibbing, John R. 1988. Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons. American Journal of Political Science 32 (3): 681712.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1965. Political Development and Political Decay. World Politics 17 (3): 386430.
Kurtz, Howard. 2009. Sotomayor Hearings Fail to Excite Adrenaline‐Fueled Media. Washington Post, July 20.
Library of Congress. 2012. Supreme Court Nominations—Not Confirmed or Withdrawn.‐withdrawn.php (accessed September 6, 2012).
Leuchtenburg, William E. 1973. A Klansman Joins the Court: The Appointment of Hugo L. Black. University of Chicago Law Review 41 (1): 131.
Maltese, John Anthony. 1995. The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78 (3): 734–49.
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McCloskey, Robert G. 1965. Reflections on the Warren Court. Virginia Law Review 51 (7): 1229–70.
McFeely, William S. 1981. Grant: A Biography. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
McGuire, Kevin T. 2004. The Institutionalization of the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis 12 (2): 128–42.
Mersky, Roy M., and Jacobstein, J. Myron, eds. 1977. The Supreme Court of the United States: Hearings and Reports on Successful and Unsuccessful Nominations of Supreme Court Justices by the Senate Judiciary Committee, 1916–1975. Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein.
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63.
Nagel, Stuart S. 1965. Court‐Curbing Periods in American History. Vanderbilt Law Review 18 (3): 925–44.
Newman, Roger K. 2003, Hugo Black: A Biography. New York: Fordham University Press.
New York Times. 1937a. Bar Asks Inquires on Future Judges. New York Times, October 2.
New York Times. 1937b. Radio Talk Is Brief. New York Times, October 2.
New York Times. 1939. Hearings Are Set on Frankfurter. New York Times, January 8.
New York Times. 2009a. Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings, Day 2.‐text.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all (accessed September 6, 2012).
New York Times. 2009b. Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings, Day 3.‐text.html?pagewanted=all (accessed September 6, 2012).
New York Times. 2009c. Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings, Day 4.‐text.html?pagewanted=all (accessed September 6, 2012).
Pacelle, Richard L. Jr., Curry, Brett W., and Marshall, Bryan W. 2011. Decision Making by the Modern Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Parrillo, Nicholas R. 2013. Leviathan and Interpretive Revolution: The Administrative State, the Judiciary, and the Rise of Legislative History, 1890–1950. Yale Law Journal 123 (2): 266529.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13 (4): 475–99.
Polsby, Nelson. 1968. The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 62 (1): 144–68.
Poole, Keith. 2013. The Polarization of the Congressional Parties. (accessed May 8, 2013).
Ragsdale, Lyn, and Theis, John J. III. 1997. The Institutionalization of the American Presidency, 1924–92. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 12801318.
Reynolds, Glenn Harlan. 1992. Taking Advice Seriously: An Immodest Proposal for Reforming the Confirmation Process Southern California Law Review 65 (March): 1572–82.
Ringhand, Lori A., and Collins, Paul M. Jr. 2011. May it Please the Senate: An Empirical Analysis of the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings of Supreme Court Nominees, 1939–2009. American University Law Review 60 (3): 589641.
Robinson, Michael J. 1974. The Impact of the Televised Watergate Hearings. Journal of Communication 24 (2): 1730.
Rutkus, Denis Steven. 2010. Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of the President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate. CRS Report for Congress, February 19.
Rutkus, Denis Steven, and Bearden, Maureen. 2009. Supreme Court Nominations, 1789–2009: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President. CRS Report for Congress, May 13.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cover, Albert D. 1989. Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. American Political Science Review 83 (2): 557–65.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Selznick, Philip. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Silverstein, Mark. 1994. Judicious Choices: The Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Sinclair, Barbara. 1988. The Distribution of Committee Positions in the U.S. Senate: Explaining Institutional Change. American Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 276301.
Squire, Peverill. 1992. The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly. Journal of Politics 54 (4): 1026–54.
Stras, David R. 2009. Pierce Butler: A Supreme Technician. Vanderbilt Law Review 62 (2): 695756.
Swift, Elaine K. 1996. The Making of an American Senate: Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 17871841. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
US Senate. 2012. Nomination Hearings for Supreme Court Justices. (accessed September 6, 2012).
Vining, Richard L. Jr. 2011. Grassroots Mobilization in the Digital Age: Interest Group Response to Supreme Court Nominees. Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 790802.
Vining, Richard L. Jr., Zorn, Christopher, and Smelcer, Susan Navarro. 2006. Judicial Tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1790–1868: Frustration, Resignation, and Expiration on the Bench. Studies in American Political Development 20 (2): 198210.
Washington Post. 2010a. Transcript: The Elena Kagan Hearings—Day 2.‐srv/politics/documents/KAGANHEARINGSDAY2.pdf (accessed January 30, 2012).
Washington Post. 2010b. Transcript: The Elena Kagan Hearings—Day 3.‐srv/politics/documents/KAGANHEARINGSDAY3.pdf (accessed January 30, 2012).
Watson, George, and Stookey, John. 1988. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings: A View from the Senate. Judicature 71 (4): 186–96.
Wedeking, Justin, and Dion, Farganis. 2010. The Candor Factor: Does Nominee Evasiveness Affect Judiciary Support for Supreme Court Nominees? Hofstra Law Review 39 (2): 329–68.
Williams, Margaret, and Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Questioning Judges About Their Decisions: Supreme Court Nominees Before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Judicature 90 (2): 7380.
Yalof, David A. 2008. Confirmation Obfuscation: Supreme Court Confirmation Politics in a Conservative Era. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 44:143–73.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964).
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The Institutionalization of Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

  • Paul M. Collins and Lori A. Ringhand


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.