Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:51:07.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frame Spillover: Media Framing and Public Opinion of a Multifaceted LGBT Rights Agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Stephen M. Engel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between May and July 2003, a shift in how the US public viewed the legality of consensual homosexual sex occurred. While in May the largest percentage of respondents to date supported decriminalizing such activity, that percentage dropped eleven points two months later. Similar declines in support were evident in the same period over a range of gay and lesbian rights claims. The ruling in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) decriminalizing homosexual sex is the obvious intervening event. To explain this pattern, coding of print and televised news coverage of the ruling throughout 2003 was undertaken. Coverage was not overtly negative in terms of antigay rhetoric or hostility toward the judiciary; rather, the dominant media frame focused on the implications of Lawrence for an entirely separate rights issue: marriage equality. This article examines the dynamic of frame “spillover,” or the idea that media focus on a distinct and not widely supported rights claim in a multifaceted rights agenda might depress support across the entire rights agenda. The findings call for further research, and they have implications for scholarship on public opinion, social movement framing, and ideational development and policy debate as studied within the broader field of American political development.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , Spring 2013 , pp. 403 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

ABC News/Washington Post Poll. 2011. Support for Gay Marriage Reaches a Milestone. March 18. abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/1121a6%20Gay%20Marriage.pdf (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Adam, Barry. 1995. The Rise of the Gay and Lesbian Movement. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Adam, Barry, Duyvenak, Jan Willem, and Krouwel, Andre, eds. 1999. The Global Emergency of Gay and Lesbian Politics: National Imprints of a Worldwide Movement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Adamany, David. 1973. Legitimacy, Realigning Elections, and the Supreme Court. Wisconsin Law Review 3:790–819 Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 1997. Are Americans Ambivalent towards Racial Policies? American Journal of Political Science 41:345–374.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Anne. 2005. Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian, and Brown, Jennifer. 2005. Mark(et)ing Nondisrimination. John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics, and Public Policy Working Papers Paper 288. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/lepp_papers/288 (accessed May 31, 2012).Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael, and Pillard, Richard C. 1991. A Genetic Study of Male Sexual Orientation. Archives of General Psychiatry 48:1089–1096.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael, Sigelman, Lee, and Wilcox, Clyde. 2003. Presidential Persuasion on Social Issues: A Two-Way Street? Political Research Quarterly 56:49–58 Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew. 2003. Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew, and Groeling, Tim. 2008. New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse. Political Communication 25:345–365.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, and Jones, Bryan. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–639.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, and Iyengar, Shanto. 2008. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication 58:707–731.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Mary. 1997. Celebration and Suppression: The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement. American Journal of Sociology 103 (3): 531–565.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Judith. 1977. The Abortion Decisions: Judicial Review and Public Opinion. In Abortion: New Directions for Policy Studies, Manier, Edward, Liu, William, and Solomon, David, eds., 51–81. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, Karlyn, and O'Keefe, Bryan. 2004. Attitudes about Homosexuality and Gay Marriage. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul. 2003. Values, Political Knowledge, and Public Opinion about Gay Rights. Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (2): 173–201.Google Scholar
Brewer, Paul. 2008. Value War: Public Opinion and the Politics of Gay Rights. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Burke, Jeremy. 2008. Primetime Spin: Media Bias and Belief Confirming Information. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 17 (3): 633–665.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 2003. The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda. Political Research Quarterly 56:29–40.Google Scholar
Cain, Patricia. 1993. Litigating for Lesbian and Gay Rights: A Legal History. Virginia Law Review 79 (7): 1551–1641.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1987. Public Opinion and The U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court-Pacing Plan. American Political Science Review 81 (4): 1139–1153.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L. 1992. The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 635–664.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and McGuire, Kevin T. 2005. What Americans Know About the Courts and Why It Matters. In Institutions of American Democracy: The Judiciary, Hall, Kermit L. and McGuire, Kevin T., eds., 262–279. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Gregory. 1976. Popular Perceptions of Supreme Court Rulings. American Politics Quarterly 4 (1): 3–45.Google Scholar
Chaffee, Steven. 1975. Political Communications: Enduring Issues for Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Chauncey, George. 2004. Why Marriage? The History Shaping Today's Debate over Gay Equality. New York: Basic Books Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N. 2007. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10:103–126.Google Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., “Neil” Strine IV, Harry C., and Waltenburg, Eric N. 2003. Framing Supreme Court Decisions: The Mainstream Versus the Black Press. Journal of Black Studies 33 (6): 784–800.Google Scholar
Clawson, Rosalee A., and Waltenburg, Eric N. 2003. Support for a Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decision: A Story in Black and White. American Politics Research 31 (3): 251–279.Google Scholar
Clendinen, Dudley, and Nagourney, Adam. 1999. Out for Good: The Struggle to Build a Gay Rights Movement in America. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Cole, David, and Eskridge, William N. 1994. From Hand-Holding to Sodomy: First Amendment Protection of Homosexual (Expressive) Conduct. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 22:319–351.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology and Discontent, Apter, David E., ed., 206–261. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker. Journal of Public Law 6:279–295.Google Scholar
Davis, Richard. 1994. Decisions and Images: The Supreme Court and the Press. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
D'Emilio, John. 1983. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey R. 2005. In the Name of Equal Rights: “Special” Rights and the Politics of Resentment in Post-Civil Rights America. Law & Society Review 39 (4): 723–757.Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa. 2002. The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism. In Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, Castronovo, R. and Neslon, D. D., eds., 175–195. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J., and Sherrill, Kenneth. 2005. Neither an In-Law nor an Outlaw Be: Trends in Americans’ Attitudes toward Gay People. Public Opinion Pros February. http://www.publicopinionpros.norc.org/features/2005/feb/sherrill_egan.asp (accessed May 31, 2012).Google Scholar
Engel, Stephen M. 2001. The Unfinished Revolution: Social Movement Theory and the Gay and Lesbian Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, Stephen M. 2007. Organizational Identity as a Constraint on Strategic Action: A Comparative Analysis of Gay and Lesbian Interest Groups. Studies in American Political Development 21 (1): 66–91.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 1989. How the Media Affect What People Think: An Information Processing Approach. Journal of Politics 51 (2): 347–370.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A. 2005. Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 2002. Liberty, Equality and Privacy: Choosing a Legal Foundation for Gay Rights. University of Chicago Legal Forum 2002:73–105.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven. 1999. Gay and Lesbian Movements in the United States: Dilemmas of Identity, Diversity, and Political Strategy. In The Global Emergence of Gay and Lesbian Politics: National Imprints of a Worldwide Movement, Adam, Barry D., Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Krouwel, Andre, eds., 30–90. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1996. The Case for Same-Sex Marriage: From Sexual Liberty to Civilized Commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 2005. Pluralism and Distrust: How Courts Can Support Democracy by Lowering the Stakes of Politics. Yale Law Journal 114:1279–1328.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr., and Spedale, Darren R. 2006. Gay Marriage: For Better or for Worse? What We've Learned from the Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr. 2004. The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values. American Journal of Political Science 32:416–440.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Zaller, John. 1992. The Political Culture of Ambivalence. American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 268–307.Google Scholar
Foreman, Matt. 2008. Gay Is Good. Nova Law Review 32 (3): 557–572.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Kosacki, Liane C. 1989. Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion. American Political Science Review 83 (3): 751–771.Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul. 2008. Black and Blue: African Americans, the Labor Movement, and the Decline of the Democratic Party. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, William. 1992. News as Framing. American Behavioral Scientist 33:157–161.Google Scholar
Gamson, William, Croteau, David, Hoynes, William, and Sasson, Theodore. 1992. Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology 18:373–393.Google Scholar
Gamson, William, and Modigliani, Andre. 1989. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructivist Approach. American Journal of Sociology 95:1–37.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretations of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ghaziani, Amin. 2008. The Dividends of Dissent: How Conflict and Culture Work in Lesbian and Gay Marches on Washington. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 2009. Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court. Journal of Politics 71 (2): 429–441.Google Scholar
Glenn, Bryan J. 2004. The Two Schools of American Political Development. Political Studies Review 2 (2): 153–165 Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of the Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan. 2004. The Limits to Union: Same-Sex Marriage and the Politics of Civil Rights. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris. 1984. Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Graglia, Lino A. 2004. Lawrence v. Texas: Our Philosopher-Kings Adopt Libertarianism as Our Official National Philosophy and Reject Traditional Morality as a Basis for Law. Ohio State Law Journal 65:1139–1150.Google Scholar
Haeberle, Steven H. 1999. Gay and Lesbian Rights: Emerging Trends in Public Opinion and Voting Behavior. In Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process, Riggle, Ellen and Tadlock, Barry, eds., 146–169. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald. 2004. Media Coverage of Lawrence v. Texas: An Analysis of Content, Tone, and Frames in National and Local News Reporting. New York: GLAAD Center for the Study of Media and Society.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1982. The Rediscovery of Ideology: Return to the Repressed in Media Studies. In Culture Society, and the Media, Gurevitch, Michael, Bennett, Tony, Curran, James, and Wollacott, Janet, eds., 56–90. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Harris, Cathy. 1996. Outing Privacy Litigation: Toward a Contextual Strategy for Lesbian and Gay Rights. George Washington Law Review 65:248–277.Google Scholar
Hattam, Victoria. 2007. In the Shadow of Race: Jews, Latinos, and Immigrant Politics in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Gary, and Lee, Tien-Tsung. 2006. Public Attitudes toward Gays and Lesbians: Trends and Predictors. Journal of Homosexuality 51 (2): 57–77.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 1995. The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court's Ability to Change Opinion. American Politics Quarterly 23 (1): 109–129.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion. American Political Science Review 94:89–100.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2003. Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., and Segal, Jeffrey A. 1996. The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel. Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1079–1102.Google Scholar
HRC (Human Rights Campaign). n.d.a. http://www.hrc.org/issues/index1.html (accessed August 26, 2011).Google Scholar
HRC (Human Rights Campaign). n.d.b. http://www.hrc.org/issues/hate_crimes/4858.htm (accessed August 26, 2011).Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald. 1987. News that Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Charles A., and Canon, Bradley C. 1984. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R., and Martin, Andrew D. 1998. The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions. American Political Science Review 92 (2): 299–309.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey. 2011. Support for Gay Relations Hits New High. Gallup News Service, May 25. http://www.gallup.com/poll/147785/Support-Legal-Gay-Relations-Hits-New-High.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey, and Saad, Lydia. 2011. Gallup Poll Social Series: Governance. Gallup News Service, September 8–11. http://www.gallup.com/poll/149906/Supreme-Court-Approval-Rating-Dips.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Communication. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2009. Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights. Law & Society Review 43 (1): 151–185.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Heather Mason. 2004. Gays in Military: Public Says Go Ahead and Tell. Gallup News Service, December 21. http://www.gallup.com/poll/14419/gays-military-public-says-ahead-tell.aspx (accessed February 15, 2003).Google Scholar
Kinsley, Michael. 2003. Abolish Marriage. Slate.com, July 2. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/readme/2003/07/abolish_marriage.html (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klapper, Joseph. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 1998. Political Rhetoric and Political Persuasion: The Changing Structure of Citizens’ Preferences on Health Insurance during Policy Debate. Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (2): 209–229.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. 2009. A Right to Discriminate? How the Case of Boys Scouts of America v. Dale Warped the Law of Free Association. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, Sydney, and Davis, Dennis. 1976. The Effects of Mass Communication on Political Behavior. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
LeVay, Simon. 1993. The Sexual Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
LeVay, Simon. 1996. Queer Science: The Use and Abuse of Research into Homosexuality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert. 2002. Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change. American Political Science Review 96:697–712.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Loftus, Jeni. 2001. America's Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review 66:762–782.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 2004. The Road Not Taken: Sex Equality in Lawrence v. Texas . Ohio State Law Journal 65:1081–1094.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. 1987. The Supreme Court as an Opinion Leader. American Politics Quarterly 15 (2): 147–168.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston, MA: Hyman.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J., and Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama. 1997. Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court. Journal of Politics 57 (4): 1114–1142.Google Scholar
Moore, David W., and Carroll, Joseph. 2004. Support for Gay Marriage/Civil Unions Edges Upward. Gallup News Service, May 17. http://www.gallup.com/poll/11689/support-gay-marriagecivil-unions-edges-upward.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Morales, Lymari. 2008. Cable, Internet News Sources Growing in Popularity. Gallup News Service, December 15. http://www.gallup.com/poll/113314/Cable-Internet-News-Sources-Growing-Popularity.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Morales, Lymari. 2009. Conservatives Shift in Favor of Openly Gay Service Members. Gallup Politics, June 5. http://www.gallup.com/poll/8413/six-americans-say-homosexual-relations-should-recognized-legal.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Mucciaroni, Gary. 2008. Same Sex Different Politics: Success & Failure in the Struggles over Gay Rights. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1968. Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: A Preliminary Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes. Law & Society Review 2 (3): 357–384.Google Scholar
National, Gay and Force, Lesbian Task. n.d. http://www.thetaskforce.org/issues (accessed August 26, 2011).Google Scholar
National, Gay and Force, Lesbian Task. 2012. Nondiscrimination Laws Map. http://www.thetaskforce.org/reports_and_research/nondiscrimination_laws (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Nava, Michael, and Davidoff, Robert. 1995. Created Equal: Why Gay Rights Matter to America. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91:567–583.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., and Kinder, Donald. 1996. Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion. Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1055–1078.Google Scholar
Newport, Frank. 2003. Six out of 10 Americans Say Homosexual Relations Should Be Recognized as Legal. Gallup News Service, May 15. http://www.gallup.com/poll/8413/six-americans-say-homosexual-relations-should-recognized-legal.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2009. Social Movements, Social Process: A Response to Gerald Rosenberg. John Marshall Law Review 42:671–683.Google Scholar
Novkov, Julie. 2001. Constituting Workers, Protecting Women. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Opinion Research Corporation. 2011. CNN Opinion Research. April 11. i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/04/19/rel6h.pdf (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert. 1983. Effects of Public Opinion on Policy. American Political Science Review 77 (1): 175–190.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pedriana, Nicholas. 2009. Intimate Equality: The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Movement's Legal Framing of Sodomy Laws in the Lawrence v. Texas Case . In Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, Barclay, Scott, Bernstein, Mary, and Marshall, Anna-Maria, eds., 52–75. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Persily, Nathaniel. 2006. Gay Marriage, Public Opinion and the Courts. Scholarship at Penn Law Paper 95. http://lsr.nellco.org/upenn_wps/95 (accessed May 31, 2012).Google Scholar
Persily, Nathaniel, Citrin, Jack, and Egan, Patrick, eds. 2008. Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Pinello, Daniel R. 2006. America's Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Princeton Survey Research Associates International. 2008. Newsweek Poll: Gay and Lesbian Rights. December 3–4. http://www.pollingreport.com/civil.htm (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Rayside, David. 1998. On the Fringe: Gays and Lesbians in Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Frank. 2009. The Bigots’ Last Hurrah. New York Times, April 18. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/opinion/19Rich.html (accessed on February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Rimmerman, Craig. 2002. From Identity to Politics: The Lesbian and Gay Movements in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rimmerman, Craig. 2008. The Lesbian and Gay Movements: Assimilation or Liberation? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jennifer. 2003. Homosexual Parenting Evenly Divides Americans. Gallup News Service, July 1. http://www.gallup.com/poll/8740/homosexual-parenting-evenly-divides-americans.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Rokeach, Milton. 1968. The Role of Values in Public Opinion Research. Public Opinion Quarterly 32:547–559.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? rev. ed. Chicago, IL: University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 2009. Saul Alinsky and the Litigation Campaign to Win the Right to Same-Sex Marriage. John Marshall Law Review 42:643–669.Google Scholar
Rubin, Peter J. 1998. Equal Rights, Special Rights, and the Nature of Antidiscrimination Law. Michigan Law Review 97 (2): 564–598.Google Scholar
Saad, Lydia. 2005. Blogs Not Yet in the Media Big Leagues. Gallup News Service, March 11. http://www.gallup.com/poll/15217/Blogs-Yet-Media-Big-Leagues.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Saad, Lydia. 2006. Americans Still Oppose Gay Marriage. Gallup News Service, May 22. http://www.gallup.com/poll/22882/americans-still-oppose-gay-marriage.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Saad, Lydia. 2007. Tolerance for Gay Rights at High Water Mark. Gallup News Service, May 29. http://www.gallup.com/poll/27694/tolerance-gay-rights-highwater-mark.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Saad, Lydia. 2008. Americans Evenly Divided on Morality of Homosexuality. Gallup article, June 18. http://www.gallup.com/poll/108115/americans-evenly-divided-morality-homosexuality.aspx (accessed February 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Seidman, Steven. 1993. Identity and Politics in a “Postmodern” Gay Culture: Some Historical and Conceptual Notes. In Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory, Warner, M., ed., 105–142. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Seidman, Steven. 2002. Beyond the Closet: The Transformation of Gay and Lesbian Life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaman, Jeffrey M. 2008. Equality and Liberty in the Golden Age of State Constitutional Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skretny, John. 2006. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot E., and Segal, Jennifer A. 1998. Television News and the Supreme Court: All the News that's Fit to Air? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Jeremy B. 2005. The Flaws of Rational Basis with Bite: Why the Supreme Court Should Acknowledge Its Application of Heightened Scrutiny to Classifications Based on Sexual Orientation. Fordham Law Review 73 (6): 2769–2814.Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R., 2008. The Ick Factor: Physiological Sensitivity to Disgust as a Predictor of Political Attitudes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Smith, Miriam. 2008. Political Institutions and Lesbian and Gay Rights in the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1992. Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America. American Political Science Review 87 (3): 549–566.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1997. Civic Ideals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S. 1995. Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review 89 (3): 543–565.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 2002. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, rev. ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Stoutenborough, James W., Haider-Merkel, Donald P., and Allen, Mahalley D. 2006. Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases. Political Research Quarterly. 59 (3): 419–433.Google Scholar
Swim, Janet K, Aiken, Kathryn J., Hall, Wayne S., and Hunter, Barbara A. 1995. Sexism and Racism: Old-Fashioned and Modern Prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (2): 199–214.Google Scholar
Swim, Janet K., and Cohen, Laurie L. 1997. Overt, Covert, and Subtle Sexism: A Comparison between the Attitudes toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21 (1): 103–118.Google Scholar
Talbot, Margaret. 2010. A Risky Proposal: Is It Too Soon to Petition the Supreme Court on Gay Marriage? New Yorker, January 18:40–51.Google Scholar
Terkilsden, Nayda, and Schnell, Frauke. 1997 How Media Frames Move Public Opinion: An Analysis of the Women's Movement. Political Research Quarterly 50 (4): 879–900.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1835, 1840] 2000. Democracy in America, Mansfield, Harvey C. and Wintrhrop, Delba, eds. and trans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vaid, Urvashi. 1995. Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay & Lesbian Liberation. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Wagner, John. 2012. Maryland House Almost Didn't Pass Gay Marriage Bill. Washington Post, February 18. http://www.washingtonpost.com/maryland-house-almost-didnt-pass-gay-marriage-bill/2012/02/18/gIQAqrBQMR_story.html (accessed February 19, 2012).Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Richard. 1977. Racism, Sexism, and Preferential Treatment: An Approach to the Topics. UCLA Law Review 24:581–592.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Wolpert, Robin. 2000. Gay Rights in the Public Sphere: Public Opinion on Gay and Lesbian Equality. In The Politics of Gay Rights, Rimmerman, Craig, Wald, Kenneth, and Wilcox, Clyde, eds., 409–432. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Evan. 2004. Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People's Right to Marry. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Yang, Alan S. 2001. Lesbians and Gays and the Politics of Knowledge: Rethinking General Models of Mass Opinion Change. In Sexual Identities, Queer Politics, Blasius, Mark, ed., 342–358. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yoshino, Kenji. 2006. Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N. 1996. Culture, Ideology, and Strategic Framing. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., eds., 261–274. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1996. The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea. In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, Mutz, Diana C., Sniderman, Paul, and Brody, Richard A., eds., 17–78. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zernike, Kate. 2012. Christie Keeps His Promise to Veto Gay Marriage Bill. New York Times, February 17. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/nyregion/christie-vetoes-gay-marriage-bill.html (accessed on February 19, 2012).Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995).Google Scholar
Baehr v. Lewin, 74 Haw. 530, 852 P.2d 44 (1993).Google Scholar
Baker v. Vermont, 744 A.2d 864 (Vt. 1999).Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).Google Scholar
Boy Scouts of America et al. v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000).Google Scholar
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).Google Scholar
Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, 798 N.E. 2d 941 (Mass 2003).Google Scholar
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
Rowland v. Mad River Local School District, 470 U.S. 1009 (1985).Google Scholar
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996).Google Scholar
United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (Pub.L. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419, enacted September 21, 1996, 1 U.S.C § 1738C.Google Scholar
Colorado Constitution of 1876.Google Scholar
Brant, Martha. 2003. “Off Beat: Out of Step.” Newsweek, August 27, Web exclusive.Google Scholar
Clift, Eleanor. 2003. Capitol Letters: Standing by Their Man. Newsweek, April 25, Web exclusive.Google Scholar
Cloud, John. 2003. It's No Big Deal. Time Magazine, July 7, 39.Google Scholar
Cloud, John. 2003. The New Face of Gay Power; Five Years after Matthew Shepard's Murder, Wyoming is Confronting Homosexuality with Surprising Candor. A Report from the Gay Frontier. Time Magazine, October 13, 52.Google Scholar
Fineman, Harold, with Lipper, Tamara. 2003. Having a Gay Old Time. Newsweek, May 5, 46.Google Scholar
George, Robert P. 2003. Untitled. Wall Street Journal, November 28, A8.Google Scholar
Getz, Arlene. 2003. Q&A: Gays and the GOP. Newsweek, July 3, Web exclusive.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Nancy, Bacon, Perry Jr., Thompson, Mark, Ressner, Jeffrey, Sachs, Andrea, and Thottam, Jyoti. 2003. A Yea for Gays; The Supreme Court Scraps Sodomy Laws, Setting Off a Hot Debate. Time Magazine, July 7, 38.Google Scholar
Gilgoff, Dan. 2003. Gays Force the Issue. U.S. News & World Report, August 18, 12.Google Scholar
Greenberger, Robert S. 2003. Untitled. Wall Street Journal, June 27, A4.Google Scholar
Hallett, Vicky. 2003. Who Do You Love? U.S. News & World Report, July 14, 38.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Sarah, and Berck, Judith. 2003. Adversaries on Gay Rights Vow State-by-State Fight. New York Times, July 5, Section 1, 8.Google Scholar
Klein, Joe. 2003. How the Supremes Redeemed Bush. Time Magazine, July 7, 27.Google Scholar
Leo, John. 2003. Anger Management. U.S. News & World Report, May 5, 36.Google Scholar
Leo, John. 2003. The Supremes’ Sophistry. U.S. News & World Report, July 14, 7.Google Scholar
Murray, Matt. 2003. Untitled. Wall Street Journal, July 7, A9.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2003. Gay Man, Citing Supreme Court Ruling, Fights ‘97 Army Discharge. New York Times, July 9, Section A, 14.Google Scholar
Quindlen, Anna. 2003. Getting Rid of the Sex Police. Newsweek, January 13, 72.Google Scholar
Quindlen, Anna. 2003. Justice Rip Van Winkle. Newsweek, July 14, 68.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2003. How to Reignite the Culture Wars. New York Times, September 7, 48 (Magazine).Google Scholar
Safire, William. 2003. The Bedroom Door. New York Times June 30, Section A, 21.Google Scholar
Simpson, Alan K. 2003. Untitled. Wall Street Journal, March 26, A12.Google Scholar
Stein, Lisa. 2003. Gay Marriage. U.S. News & World Report, August 11, 8.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew. 2003. The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage; Want to Foster Responsibility and Commitment? There is No Better Way. Time Magazine, June 30, 78.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew. 2003. Beware the Straight Backlash; Queer Eye Takes a Step Forward, but the Conflict over Gay Marriage Could Get Ugly. Time Magazine, August 11, 35.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew. 2003. Untitled. Wall Street Journal, October 8, A24.Google Scholar
Thomas, Evan, with Gegax, T. Trent, Rosenberg, Debra, Wingert, Pan, Miller, Mark, Brant, Martha, Taylor, Stuart Jr., Lipper, Tamara, Barry, John, Sinderbrand, Rebecca, Childress, Sarah, and Scelfo, Julie. 2003. The War over Gay Marriage. Newsweek, July 7, 38.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal. 2003. Untitled. Wall Street Journal, July 27, A12.Google Scholar