Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T06:29:37.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emotion, Authority, and Death: (Raced) Negotiations in Mock Capital Jury Deliberations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Mona Lynch  and
Craig Haney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the role of emotion in the capital penalty‐phase jury deliberations process. It is based on the qualitative analysis of data from ninety video‐recorded four to seven person simulated jury deliberations that examined the influence of race on death sentencing outcomes. The analysis explores when and how emotions are expressed, integrated into the jury's sentencing process, and deployed in penalty‐phase decision making. The findings offer critical new insights into the role that emotion plays in influencing these legal judgments by revealing how jurors strategically and explicitly employ emotion in the course of deliberation, both to support their own positions and neutralize or rebut the opposing positions of others. The findings also shed light on the various ways that white male capital jurors utilize a panoply of powerful emotion‐based tactics to sway others to their position in a manner that often contributes to racially biased outcomes.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , Spring 2015 , pp. 377 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abramson, Jeffrey. 1998. Two Ideals of Jury Deliberation. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1998:125–160.Google Scholar
Amodio, David M., and Devine, Patricia G. 2006. Stereotyping and Evaluation in Implicit Race Bias: Evidence for Independent Constructs and Unique Effects on Behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 91:652–661.Google Scholar
Baldus, David C., Woodworth, George, Zuckerman, David, Alan Weiner, Neil, and Broffitt, Barbara. 1998. Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty in the Post‐Furman Era: An Empirical and Legal Overview, with Recent Findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review 83:1638–1770.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan. 1996. Empathy, Narrative, and Victim Impact Statements. University of Chicago Law Review 63:361–412.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan. 1999. The Passions of Law. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan. 2008. Repellant Crimes and Rational Deliberation: Emotion and the Death Penalty. Vermont Law Review 33:489–518.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan, and Salerno, Jessica. Forthcoming. Emotion, Proof and Prejudice: The Cognitive Science of Gruesome Photos and Victim Impact Statements. Arizona State Law Journal 46.Google Scholar
Berman, Douglas, and Bibas, Stephanos. 2008. Engaging Capital Emotions. Northwestern University Law Review, 102:355–364.Google Scholar
Binnall, James. 2009. Sixteen Million Angry Men: Reviving a Dead Doctrine to Challenge the Constitutionality of Excluding Felons from Jury Service. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 17:1–42.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Jeremy A. 2005. Does Mood Influence Moral Judgment? An Empirical Test with Legal and Policy Implications. Law & Psychology Review 29:1–28.Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, Galen V., Sheppard, Lori A., and Kramer, Geoffrey P. 1994. Negative Affect and Social Judgment: The Differential Impact of Anger and Sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology 24:45–62.Google Scholar
Bowers, William, Steiner, Benjamin, and Sandys, Marla. 2001. Death Sentencing in Black and White: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Jurors' Race and Jury Racial Composition. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 3:171–274.Google Scholar
Bright, David A., and Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane. 2006. Gruesome Evidence and Emotion: Anger, Blame, and Jury Decision‐Making. Law & Human Behavior 30:183–202.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Nilanjana, DeSteno, David, Williams, Lisa A., and Hunsinger, Matthew. 2009. Fanning the Flames of Prejudice: The Influence of Specific Incidental Emotions on Implicit Prejudice. Emotion 9:585–591.Google Scholar
Devine, Dennis J., Clayton, Laura D., B. Dunford, Benjamin, Seying, Rasmy, and Price, Jennifer. 2000. Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups. Psychology, Public Policy & Law 7:622–727.Google Scholar
Douglas, Kevin S., Lyon, David R., and Ogloff, James. 1997. The Impact of Graphic Photographic Evidence on Mock Jurors' Decisions in a Murder Trial. Law & Human Behavior 21:485–501.Google Scholar
Dovidio, John F., Johnson, James D., Gaertner, Samuel L., Pearson, Adam R., Saguy, Tamar, and Ashburn‐Nardo, Leslie. 2010. Empathy and Intergroup Relations. In Prosocial Motives, Emotions, and Behavior: The Better Angels of our Nature, ed. Mikulincer, M. and Shaver, P., 393–408. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Feigenson, Neal, and Park, Jaihyun. 2006. Emotions and Attributions of Legal Responsibility and Blame: A Research Review. Law & Human Behavior 30:143–161.Google Scholar
Forgas, Joseph P. 1995. Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin 117:39–66.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P. 2000. The Emotional Economy of Capital Sentencing. New York University Law Review 75:26–73.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2002. How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6:517–523.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2001. The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review 108:814–834.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig. 1997. Violence and the Capital Jury: Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement and the Impulse to Condemn to Death. Stanford Law Review 49:1447–1486.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig. 2004. Condemning the Other in Death Penalty Trials: Biographical Racism, Structural Mitigation, and the Empathic Divide. DePaul Law Review 53:1557–1589.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig. 2005. Death by Design: Capital Punishment as a Social Psychological System. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hastie, Reid. 2001. Emotions in Jurors' Decisions. Brooklyn Law Review 66:991–1009.Google Scholar
Horberg, E. J., Oveis, Christopher, and Keltner, Dacher. 2011. Emotions as Moral Amplifiers: An Appraisal Tendency Approach to the Influences of Distinct Emotions upon Moral Judgment. Emotion Review 3:237–244.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan, and Nussbaum, Martha. 1996. Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review 96:269–374.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Keltner, Dacher. 2000. Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion‐Specific Influences on Judgment and Choice. Cognition & Emotion 14:473–493.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona. 2006. Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Life and Death Decision‐Making: Lessons from Laypersons in an Experimental Setting. In From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State: Race and the Death Penalty, ed. Sarat, Austin and Ogletree, Charles, 182–209. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona, and Haney, Craig. 2000. Discrimination and Instructional Comprehension: Guided Discretion, Racial Bias, and the Death Penalty. Law & Human Behavior 24:337–358.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona, and Haney, Craig. 2009. Capital Jury Deliberation: Effects on Death Sentencing, Comprehension, and Discrimination. Law & Human Behavior 33:481–496.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona, and Haney, Craig. 2011. Mapping the Racial Bias of the White Male Capital Juror: Jury Composition and the “Empathic Divide.” Law & Society Review 45:69–101.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona, and Haney, Craig. 2012. Looking Across the Empathic Divide: Racialized Decision‐Making on the Capital Jury. Michigan State Law Review 2011:573–607.Google Scholar
Maroney, Terry A. 2006. Law and Emotion: A Proposed Taxonomy of an Emerging Field. Law & Human Behavior 30:119–142.Google Scholar
Myers, Bryan, and Greene, Edith. 2004. The Prejudicial Nature of Victim Impact Statements. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 10:492–515.Google Scholar
Paternoster, Raymond, and Diese, Jerome. 2011. A Heavy Thumb on the Scale: The Effect of Victim Impact Evidence on Capital Decision Making. Criminology 49:129–161.Google Scholar
Pettys, Todd E. 2007. The Emotional Juror. Fordham Law Review 76:1609–1640.Google Scholar
Rose, Mary R., Nadler, Janice, and Clark, Jim. 2006. Appropriately Upset? Emotion Norms and Perceptions of Crime Victims. Law & Human Behavior 30:203–219.Google Scholar
Salerno, Jessica. 2012. One Angry Woman: Emotion Expression and Minority Influence in a Jury Deliberation Context. Dissertation Thesis, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1993. Speaking of Death: Narratives of Violence in Capital Trials. Law & Society Review 27:19–58.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 2001. When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schnall, Simone, Haidt, Jonathan, Clore, Gerald L., and Jordan, Alexander H. 2008. Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 34:1096–1109.Google Scholar
Schreier, Margrit. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Simon, Dan. 2004. A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making. University of Chicago Law Review 71:511–586.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Margaret C., Bottoms, Bette L., and Diamond, Shari S. 2010. Jurors' Discussions of a Defendant's History of Child Abuse and Alcohol Abuse in Capital Sentencing Deliberations. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 16:1–38.Google Scholar
Sundby, Scott. 2003. The Capital Jury and Empathy: The Problem of Worthy and Unworthy Victims. Cornell Law Review 88:343–381.Google Scholar
Sundby, Scott. 2010. War and Peace in the Jury Room: How Capital Juries Reach Unanimity. Hastings Law Journal 62:103–154.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. Critical Discourse Analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, and Hamilton, Heidi, 352–371. Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wiener, Richard L., Bornstein, Brian H., and Voss, Amy. 2006. Emotion and the Law: A Framework for Inquiry. Law & Human Behavior 30:221–248.Google Scholar
Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).Google Scholar
Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (1992).Google Scholar
Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991).Google Scholar
Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (1985).Google Scholar
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968).Google Scholar
Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).Google Scholar
Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (1992).Google Scholar
Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991).Google Scholar
Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (1985).Google Scholar
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968).Google Scholar