Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T17:34:16.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextualizing Bias Crimes: A Social and Theoretical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Alexander Tsesis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , Winter 2003 , pp. 315 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L. 1998. Speaking Respect, Respecting Speech. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1985. Model Penal Code. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Bagoric, Mirko, and Amarasekara, Kumar. 2000. The Errors of Retributivism. Melbourne University Law Review 24: 124–89.Google Scholar
Baker, John S. Jr. 2000. United States v. Morrison and Other Arguments against “Hate Crimes” Legislation. Boston University Law Review 80: 1191–1225.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1843. The Principles of Penal Law. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: W. Tait.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Pettit, Philip. 1990. Not Just Deserts: A Republication Theory of Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotton, Michele. 2000. Back with a Vengeance: The Resilience of Retribution as an Articulated Purpose of Criminal Punishment. American Criminal Law Review 37: 1313–62.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Stefancic, Jean. 1996. Ten Arguments against Hate-Speech Regulation: How Valid Northern Kentucky Law Review 23: 475–90.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, and Yun, David H. 1994. Pressure Valves and Bloodied Chickens: An Analysis of Paternalistic Objections to Hate Speech Regulation. California Law Review 82: 871–92.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. 1986. Trials and Punishments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. 1996. Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment, Crime and Justice 20: 1–89.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1933. Division of Labor in Societytrans. Simpson, George. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Torstein. 1983. Justifications of Punishment. In Philosophy and the Criminal Law, ed. Duff, Antony and Simmonds, Nigel. Totowa, N. J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. 1927. Punishment as a Moral Agency: An Attempt to Reconcile the Retributive and the Utilitarian View. Mind 36: 292–305.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black Skin, White Maskstrans. Markmann, Charles Lam. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2000. Hate Crime Statistics. In Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Report. Washington, D. C.: Federal Bureau of Investigation.Google Scholar
Finkelman, Paul. 1993. The Color of Law. Northwestern University Law Review 87: 937–91.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire. 2000. The Inefficiency of Mens Rea. California Law Review 88: 895–920.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, ed. 1999. Collected Papers of John Rawls. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gellman, Susan. 1991. Sticks and Stones Can Put You in Jail, But Can Words Increase Your Sentence? Constitutional and Policy Dilemmas of Ethnic Intimidation Laws. UCLA Law Review 39: 333–96.Google Scholar
Gey, Steven G. 1997. What if Wisconsin v. Mitchell Had Involved Martin Luther King Jr.? The Constitutional Flaws of Hate Crime Enhancement Statutes. George Washington Law Review 65: 1014–70.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. 1992. The Human Good and the Ambitions of Consequentialism, Social Philosophy and Policy 9: 118–32.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. L., and Trolier, T. K. 1986. Stereotypes and Stereotyping. In Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, ed. Dovidio, John F. and Samuel, L. Orlando, Gaertner, Fla.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herek, Gregory M. 1989. Hate Crimes against Lesbians and Gay Men: Issues for Research and Policy. American Psychologist 44: 948–55.Google Scholar
Hodgson, David H. 1967. Consequences of Utilitarianism: A Study in Normative Ethics and Legal Theory. Oxford, England: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Jacobs, James B., and Potter, Kimberly. 1998. Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenness, Valerie, and Grattet, Ryken 2001. Making Hate a Crime. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kadish, Sanford H., and Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1995. Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative Ethics. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kalam, Murad. 2000. Hate Crime Prevention. Harvard Journal on Legislation 37: 593–605.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1797] 1965. The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, trans. Ladd, John. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kleg, Milton. 1993. Hate Prejudice and Racism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kupperman, J. J. 1982. Utilitarianism Today. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 36: 318–30.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Frederick M. 1993. Civil Rights and Criminal Wrongs: The Mens Rea of Federal Civil Rights Crime. Tulane Law Review 67: 2113–2224.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Frederick M. 1994. The Punishment of Hate: Toward a Normative Theory of Bias-Motivated Crimes. Michigan Law Review 93: 320–81.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Frederick M. 19992000. The Case for a Federal Bias Crime Law. National Black Law Journal 16: 144–68.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, Judith. 1983. The Right, the All Right, and the Good. Yale Law Journal 92: 544–63.Google Scholar
Lyons, William. 1974. Deterrent Theory and Punishment of the Innocent. Ethics 84: 346–48.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1867. Letter from James Madison to General Lafayette (25 Nov. 1820). In Letters and Other Writings of James Madison. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. 1989. Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story. Michigan Law Review 87: 2320–81.Google Scholar
McCloskey, H. J. 1965. A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment. Inquiry 8: 249–63.Google Scholar
McCord, David. 1998. Imagining a Retributivist Alternative to Capital Punishment. Florida Law Review 50: 1–143.Google Scholar
Morris, Herbert. 1968. Persons and Punishment. Monist 52: 475–501.Google Scholar
Morris, Herbert. 1981. A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment. American Philosophical Quarterly. 18: 263–71.Google Scholar
Morsch, James. 1991. The Problem of Motive in Hate Crimes: The Argument against Presumptions of Racial Motivation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 82: 659–89.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G. 1985. Retributivism and the State's Interest in Punishment. In Criminal Justice, ed. Roland Pennock, J., and Chapman, John W. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, Leon 1982. A Case against the Kantian Retributivist Theory of Punishment: A Response to Professor Pugsley. Hofstra Law Review 11: 273–306.Google Scholar
Perry, Barbara. 2001. In the Name of Hate: Understanding Hate Crimes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, Scott, and Grattet, Ryken. 2000. Judicial Rhetoric, Meaning-Making, and the Institutionalization of Hate Crime Law. Law and Society Review 34: 567–606.Google Scholar
Primoratz, Igor. 1989. Justifying Legal Punishment. Atlantic Highlands, N. J.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Pugsley, Robert A. 1979. Retributivism: A Just Basis for Criminal Sentences. Hofstra Law Review. 7: 379–405.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. [1955] 1999. Two Concepts of Rules. In Freeman 1999.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. [1967] 1999. Distributive Justice. In Freeman 1999.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1948. Anti-Semite and Jew, trans. Becker, George J. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Scotting, Troy A. 2001. Hate Crimes and the Need for Stronger Federal Legislation. Akron Law Review 34: 853–92.Google Scholar
Sprigge, T. L. S. 1965. A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey. Inquiry 8: 264–91.Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol S. 1999. Punishing Hateful Motives: Old Wine in a New Bottle Revives Calls for Prohibition. Michigan Law Review 97: 1857–73.Google Scholar
Taslitz, Andrew E. 1999. Condemning the Racist Personality: Why the Critics of Hate Crimes Legislation Are Wrong. Boston College Law Review 40: 739–85.Google Scholar
Taslitz, Andrew E. 2000. Hate Crimes, Free Speech, and the Contract of Mutual Indifference. Boston University Law Review 80: 1283–1398.Google Scholar
Ten, C. L. 1987. Crime, Guilt, and Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ten, C. L. 1990. Positive Retributivism. Social Philosophy and Policy 7: 194–208.Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander. 2000. The Empirical Shortcomings of First Amendment Jurisprudence: A Historical Perspective on the Power of Hate Speech. Santa Clara Law Review 40: 729–86.Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander. 2001. Hate in Cyberspace: Regulating Hate Speech on the Internet. San Diego Law Review 38: 817–74.Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander. 2002. Destructive Messages: How Hate Speech Paves the Way for Harmful Social Movements. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Uhrich, Craig L. 1999. Hate Crime Legislation: A Policy Analysis. Houston Law Review 36: 1467–1529.Google Scholar
Wang, Lu-in. 1997. The Transforming Power of “Hate”: Social Cognition Theory and the Harms of Bias-Related Crime. Southern California Law Review 71: 47–135.Google Scholar
Wang, Lu-in. 1999. The Complexities of “Hate. Ohio State Law Journal 60: 799–900.Google Scholar
Weiss, Joan C., Ehrlich, Howard J., and Larcom, Barbara E. K. 199192. Ethnoviolence at Work. Journal of Intergroup Relations 18(Winter): 21–33.Google Scholar
Wendel, W. Bradley. 2000. Value Pluralism in Legal Ethics. Washington University Law Quarterly 78: 113–213.Google Scholar
Wexler, Chuck, and Marx, Gary T. 1986. When Law and Order Works: Boston's Innovative Approach to the Problem of Racial Violence. Crime and Delinquency 32: 205–23.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1972. Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar