Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T14:23:49.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Up from the Streets: Handler and the Ambiguities of Empowerment and Dependency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Julie A. White  and
John Gilliom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , Winter 1998 , pp. 203 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annie E. Casey Foundation. 1988. A Strategic Planning Guide for the New Futures Initiative. Greenwich, Conn.: Annie E. Casey Foundation.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Edin, Kathryn. 1993. There's a Lot of Month Left at the End of the Money: How Welfare Recipients Make Ends Meet in Chicago. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Gordon, Linda. 1994. A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the US. Welfare State. Signs 19, no. 2: 309–36.Google Scholar
Gilliom, John. 1997. Everyday Surveillance, Everyday Resistance: Computer Monitoring in the Lives of the Appalachian Poor. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 16:275–97.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1979. Protecting the Social Service Client. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1992. Postmodernism, Protest, and the New Social Movements. Law & Society Review 26, no. 4: 697–732.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F., and Hasenfeld, Yeheskel. 1991. The Moral Construction of Poverty: American Welfare Reform. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Martin, Elaine. 1986. Consumer Evaluation of Human Services. Social Policy and Administration 20, no 3: 185–200.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1992. Resistance, Reconstruction, and Romance in Legal Scholarship. Law & Society Review 26, no. 4: 733–50.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, and March, Tracey. 1996. Law and Everyday Forms of Resistance: A Socio-Political Assessment. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 15:207–36.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. The Disorder of Women. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1977. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1990. The Law Is All Over: Power, Resistance, and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2:343–79.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Steering Committee Consortium on Chicago School Research. 1993. A View from the Elementary Schools: The State of Reform in Chicago; A Report of the Steering Committee Consortium on Chicago School Research.Google Scholar
White, Julie. 1996. The Problem of Paternalism: Social Policy and the Practices of Care. Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
White, Julie, and Wehlage, Gary. 1995. Community Collaboration: If It IS Such a Good Idea, Why Is It So Hard to Do Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17, no. 1: 23–38.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar