No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Measuring Up: A Dialogical Model for Assuring a Reparative Process
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 August 2023
Abstract
International law obliges governments to assure adequate and effective reparations for human rights violations. To date, most evaluations of such programs focus on outcomes while overlooking the process of how the state engaged victims, or not, in the determination of what they needed to feel repaired. A consensus now points toward the need to better involve beneficiaries in reparations programs in the process of determining these outcomes, yet there remains a need to better understand how to assure meaningful and effective participation. In response, the authors present an expansive view of the right to participation that would oblige governments to assure the quality of this participation in all stages of reparation programming, including design, implementation, and evaluation. They argue that reparative processes are, in themselves, forms of reparation, which go toward citizen restitution. They offer preliminary guidelines on how to assure reparative processes, as well as their evaluation, through a dialogical model that helps reorient the view of “victims” to being active agents in determining not only appropriate reparations but also larger transformations. Reparative processes shift the focus of evaluation to look beyond outcomes and toward the quality of the design and implementation processes, which, if flawed, may ultimately undermine the overall impact of any reparation program.
- Type
- Measures of Justice: A Symposium in Honor of Sally Engle Merry (1944–2020)
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Bar Foundation
Footnotes
We would like to thank Eman Elshrafi for her excellent assistance with research for this project. We also appreciate the help and feedback on earlier drafts from Carolina Silva Portero and Pamina Firchow.
References
REFERENCES
Afflerbach, Thorsten, and Garabagiu, Angela. 2007. “Council of Europe Actions to Promote Human Rights and Full Participation of People with Disabilities: Improving the Quality of Life of People with Disabilities in Europe.” Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34, no. 2: 463–82.Google Scholar
Antkowiak, Thomas M. 2008. “Remedial Approaches to Human Rights Violations: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Beyond.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 46, no. 2: 351–419.Google Scholar
Arriaza, Laura, and Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2008. “Social Reconstruction as a Local Process.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 2, no. 2: 152–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asian Development Bank. 2012. Strengthening Participation for Development Results: An Asian Development Bank Guide to Participation. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette. 2014. “The Importance of Conversation in Transitional Justice: A Study of Land Restitution in South Africa.” Law & Social Inquiry 39, no. 4: 902–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, Jacqueline, Matache, Margareta, and Elkins, Caroline, eds. 2021. Time for Reparations: A Global Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boal, Augusto. 1985. Theatre of the Oppressed, translated by Charles, A. McBride and Maria-Odilia Leal McBride. New York: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
Bundschuh, Thomas. 2015. “Enabling Transitional Justice, Restoring Capabilities: The Imperative of Participation and Normative Integrity.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 9, no. 1: 10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2014. “Bodily Vulnerability, Coalitions, and Street Politics.” Critical Studies 37: 99–119.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2016. “Rethinking Vulnerability and Resistance.” In Vulnerability in Resistance, edited by Butler, Judith, Gambetti, Zeynep, and Sabsay, Leticia, 21–27. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Butti, Elena, and McGonigle Leyh, Brianne. 2019. “Intersectionality and Transformative Reparations: The Case of Colombian Marginal Youth.” International Criminal Law Review 19: 753–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Lyn, and Lubensky, Ron. 2010. “Raising Expectations of Democratic Participation: An Analysis of the National Human Rights Consultation.” University of New South Wales Law Journal 33, no. 1: 34–59.Google Scholar
Casas Caro, Mabel. 2017. “El Monumento a Los 19 Comerciantes: Lecciones Sobre La Reparación y Construcción De Memoria.” Master’s thesis, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.Google Scholar
Contesse, Jorge. 2019. “Resisting the Inter-American Human Rights System.” Yale Journal of International Law 44, no. 2: 179–238.Google Scholar
Corradi Fiumara, Gemma. 1995. The Other Side of Language: A Philosophy of Listening. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Correa, Cristián, Guillerot, Julie, and Magarrell, Lisa. 2020. “Reparations and Victim Participation: Experiences with the Design and Implementation of Domestic Reparations Programmes.” In Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, edited by Ferstman, Carla and Goetz, Mariana, 240–70. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Erin. 2002. “Transformative Justice: Charting a Path to Reconciliation.” International Legal Perspective 12, nos. 1–2: 73–183.Google Scholar
Danieli, Yael. 2020. “Massive Trauma and the Healing Role of Reparative Justice.” In Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, edited by Ferstman, Carla and Goetz, Mariana, 38–85. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Greiff, Pablo, ed. 2009. The Handbook of Reparations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Waardt, Mijke, and Weber, Sanne. 2019. “Beyond Victims’ Mere Presence: An Empirical Analysis of Victim Participation in Transitional Justice in Colombia.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 11, no. 1: 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, Murli, and Goel, Sheetal. 2018. Child Rights Education for Participation and Development: Primary Prevention. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolin, Katherine. 2007. “But What Does It Mean? Seeking Definitional Clarity in Restorative Justice.” Journal Criminal Law 71, no. 5: 427–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Engole, Martha. 2012. Reparations for Women Victims of SGBV in Situations of Armed Conflict: The Case of Northern Uganda. London: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Evrard, Elke, Mejía Bonifazi, Gretel, and Destrooper, Tine. 2021. “The Meaning of Participation in Transitional Justice: A Conceptual Proposal for Empirical Analysis.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 15, no. 2: 428–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firchow, Pamina. 2018. Reclaiming Everyday Peace: Local Voices in Measurement and Evaluation After War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firchow, Pamina, and Selim, Yvette. 2022. “Meaningful Engagement from the Bottom-Up? Taking Stock of Participation in Transitional Justice Processes.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 16, no. 2: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, Paulo. 2014. Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 30
th
Anniversary Edition, translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Fuenmayor, Patricia, and Victoria Fallon, María. 2014. 10 Años: Monumento los Niños de Villatina: Tras los pasos de la construcción de la memoria. Medellín: Grupo Interdiciplinario por los Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1969. “Human Interaction and the Law.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 14, no. 1: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, E. Clinton. 1992. “John Locke: Justice and the Social Compact.” Journal of Law and Religion 9, no. 2: 347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretative Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Grace, Jeremy, and Mooney, Erin. 2010. “Political Participation Rights in Particular the Right to Vote.” In Incorporating the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement into Domestic Law: Issues and Challenges, edited by Walter Kälin, Rhodri C. Williams, Khalid Koser, and Solomon, Andrew, 507–50, vol. 41. Washington, DC: American Society of International Law and The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Gready, Paul, and Robins, Simon. 2014. “From Transitional to Transformative Justice: A New Agenda for Practice.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 8, no. 3: 339–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeley, Robin Adèle, Orwicz, Michael R., Falconi, José Luis, Reyes, Ana María, Rosenberg, Fernando J., and Laplante, Lisa J.. 2020. “Repairing Symbolic Reparations: Assessing the Effectiveness of Memorialization in the Inter-American System of Human Rights.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 14, no. 1: 165–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Anne. 1996. “Legal Pluralism in Africa: The Role of Gender and Women’s Access to Law.,” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 19, no. 2: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1995. “On the Internal Relation between the Rule of Law and Democracy.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 1: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Donna. 2021. Dignity: Its Essential Role in Resolving Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschkop, Ken. 1999. Mikhail Bakhtin: An Aesthetic for Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirvonen, Pasi. 2016. “Positioning Theory and Small-Group Interaction: Social and Task Positioning in the Context of Joint Decision-Making.” Sage Open 6, no. 3: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2013. Antigone, Interrupted. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosie, Simón. 2017. “Fundamentos Metodológicos de Planos Vivos y su Aplicación en Pescaíto.” In Planos Vivos Pescaíto: Investigación Participativa y Diseño Sostenible, 33–50. Bogotá: Findeter.Google Scholar
Hudson, Barbara. 2007. “The Institutionalisation of Restorative Justice: Justice and the Ethics of Discourse.” Acta Juridica 2007, no. 1: 56–72.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2011. “Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights.” Cornell International Law Journal 44, no. 3: 493–533.Google Scholar
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 2021. Compendium of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on Truth, Memory, Justice and Reparation in Transitional Contexts, Doc. OEA/Ser.L/V/II/121.Google Scholar
Johnston, Barbara Rose, and Slyomovics, Susan, eds. 2009 Waging War, Making Peace: Reparations and Human Rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kawashima, Saeko. 2004. “The Right to Effective Participation and the Ainu People.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 11, nos. 1–2: 21–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kester, Grant H. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kraay, Henrik. 2005. “‘Cold as the Stone of Which It Must Be Made’: Caboclos, Monuments and Memory of Independence in Bahia Brazil, 1870–1900.” In Images of Power: Iconography, Culture and the State in Latin America, edited by Andermann, Jens and Rowe, William, 165–94. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Kumabe, Kerry. 2010. “The Public’s Right of Participation: Attaining Environmental Justice in Hawai’i through Deliberative Decisionmaking.” Asian American Law Journal 17, no. 1: 181–218.Google Scholar
Ladisch, Virginie, and Yakinthou, Christalla. 2020. “Cultivated Collaboration in Transitional Justice Practice and Research: Reflections on Tunisia’s Voices of Memory Project.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 14, no. 1: 80–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laplante, Lisa J. 2007. “On the Indivisibility of Rights: Truth Commissions, Reparations, and the Right to Development.” Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 10: 141–77.Google Scholar
Laplante, Lisa J. 2010–11. “Evaluating Truth Commissions and Reparations through the Eyes of Victims.” L’observateur des Nations Unies 28: 167–76.Google Scholar
Laplante, Lisa J. 2013. “Negotiating Reparation Rights: The Participatory and Symbolic Quotients.” Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 19: 217–50.Google Scholar
Laplante, Lisa J. 2015. “Just Repair.” Cornell International Law Journal 48, no. 3: 513–78.Google Scholar
Linenthal, Edward T. 2001. The Unfinished Bombing: Oklahoma City in American Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Lykes, M., and Mersky, Marcie. 2006. “Reparations and Mental Health: Psychosocial Interventions towards Healing, Human Agency, and Rethreading Social Realities.” In The Handbook of Reparations, edited by De Greiff, Pablo, 589–622. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magarrell, Lisa. 2003. “Reparations for Massive or Widespread Human Rights Violations: Sorting Out Claims for Reparations and the Struggle for Social Justice.” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 22: 85–98.Google Scholar
Malena, Carmen. 2009. “Building Political Will for Participatory Governance: An Introduction.” In From Political Won’t to Political Will: Building Support for Participatory Governance, edited by Malena, Carmen, 209–64. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. 1987. “Looking to the Bottom: Critical Legal Studies and Reparations.” Harvard Civil Rights/Civil Liberties Law Review 22, no. 2: 323–99.Google Scholar
Melish, Tara J. 2010. “Maximum Feasible Participation of the Poor: New Governance, New Accountability, and a 21st Century War on the Sources of Poverty.” Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 13: 1–134.Google Scholar
Méndez, Juan E. 2016. “Victims as Protagonists in Transitional Justice.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 10, no. 1: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22, no. 5: 869–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. “Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle.” American Anthropologist 108, no. 1: 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelini, Ann N. 2009. “Plato’s Dialogic Technique.” The Classical Review 59, no. 2: 377–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minow, Martha, and William Singer, Joseph. 2010. “In Favor of Foxes: Pluralism as Fact and Aid to the Pursuit of Justice.” Boston University Law Review 90: 903–20.Google Scholar
Moses, Sarah. 2007. “A Just Society for the Elderly: The Importance of Justice as Participation.” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 21, no. 2: 335–62.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 66, no. 3: 745–58.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogletree, Charles J. Jr. 2003. “The Current Reparations Debate.” University of California Davis Law Review 36, no. 5: 1051–72.Google Scholar
Ottendoerfer, Eva. 2018. “Translating Victims’ ‘Right to Reparations’ into Practice: A Framework for Assessing the Implementation of Reparations Programs from a Bottom-Up Perspective.” Human Rights Quarterly 40, no. 4: 905–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, Lejandrina, and Santamaria, Angela. 2021. “Experiences of Spiritual Advocacy for Land and Territorial Itineraries for the Defense of Wiwa Women’s Rights in Postconflict Colombia.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 15, no. 1: 86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, Jacqueline. 2001. “Giving the Public a Voice in the Protection of the Global Environment: Avenues for Participation by NGOs in Dispute Resolution at the European Court of Justice and World Trade Organization.” Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 12: 47–76.Google Scholar
Ramji-Nogales, Jaya. 2010. “Designing Bespoke Transitional Justice: A Pluralist Process Approach.” Michigan Journal of International Law 32, no. 1: 1–72.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Joanne. 2020. Cowards Don’t Make History: Orlando Fals Borda and the Origins of Participatory Action Research. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Reyes, Ana María. 2019. “The Monument to the Children of Villatina: Commemorating Innocent Child Victims in the Context of Lethally Stigmatized Youth in Colombia.” Visual Communication 18: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Ana María. 2020. “Sites of Repair: Symbolic Spaces in Reparations.” Latin American and Latinx Visual Culture 2, no. 2: 112–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, Simon. 2011. “Towards Victim-centred Transitional Justice: Understanding the Needs of Families of the Disappeared in Postconflict Nepal.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 5, no.1: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2004. “Reparations Decisions and Dilemmas.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 27, no. 2: 157–219.Google Scholar
Rondón Daza, Lina. 2018. “Reconstruir el Tejido Social. Un Trabajo por hacer con las Comunidades Afectadas y una Orientación Dirigida a Rehumanizar la Sociedad.” In Entre Acuerdos y Desacuerdos: Memorias de una Paz en Disputa, edited by Keilyn Julieth Sánchez Espitia, 151–66. Bogotá: Instituto para la Pedagogía, la Paz y el Conflicto Urbano, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.Google Scholar
Roque, Sandra, and Shankland, Alex. 2007. “Participation, Mutation and Political Transition: New Democratic Spaces in Peri Urban Angola.” In Spaces for Change? The Politics of Participation in New Democratic Arenas, edited by Andrea Cornwall and Vera Schattan Coelho, 202–25. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, and Cranston, Maurice. 2004. “Introduction.” In The Social Contract, translated and edited by Cranston, Maurice, 29–30. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rudling, Adriana. 2019. “What’s Inside the Box? Mapping Agency and Conflict within Victims’ Organizations.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 13, no. 3: 458–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, Clara. 2017. “Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: Reflections on the Jurisprudential Turn of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on Domestic Reparation Programmes.” International Journal of Human Rights 22, no. 9: 1–17.Google Scholar
Schönsteiner, Judith. 2011. “Reducing Victim-Oriented Interpretation in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: at the Price of Procedural Certainty?” Social Sciences Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1995. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C. 2009. “How Business Shapes Law: A Socio-Legal Framework.” Connecticut Law Review 42, no. 1: 147–84.Google Scholar
Shefik, Sherin. 2018. “Reimagining Transitional Justice through Participatory Art.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 12, no. 2: 314–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, Doris. 2014. The Work of Art in the World: Civic Agency and Public Humanities. Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprenkels, Ralph. 2017. Restricted Access: Promises and Pitfalls of Victim Participation in Transitional Justice Mechanisms, edited by Nassar, Habib. The Hague: Impunity Watch.Google Scholar
Suchkova, Maria. 2011. The Importance of a Participatory Reparations Process and Its Relationship to the Principles of Reparation, edited by Sandoval, Clara. Wivenhoe Park, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Thomson, Susan, and Nagy, Rosemary. 2011. “Law, Power and Justice: What Legalism Fails to Address in the Functioning of Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 5, no. 1: 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triponel, Anna, and Pearson, Stephen. 2010. “What Do You Think Should Happen? Public Participation in Transitional Justice.” Pace International Law Review 22, no. 1: 103–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Jennifer, and Robins, Simon. 2018. Strengthening Participation in Local-Level and National Transitional Justice Processes: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: International Coalition of Sites of Conscience, the Global Initiative for Justice, Truth and Reconciliation. https://www.sitesofconscience.org/en/strengthening-participation/.Google Scholar
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2000. Substantive Issues Arising in the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN Doc. E/C. 12.2000/4, August 11.Google Scholar
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2005. Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights through Action to Combat Impunity (the Impunity Principles), UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add. 1, February 8.Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General. 2004. The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, UN Doc. S/2004/616, August 23.Google Scholar
UN Secretary-General. 2011. The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, UN Doc. S/ 2011/634, October 12.Google Scholar
Verstichel, Annelies. 2005. “Recent Developments in the UN Human Rights Committee’s Approach to Minorities, with a Focus on Effective Participation.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 12, no. 1: 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinck, Patrick, and Pham, Phuong. 2008. “Ownership and Participation in Transitional Justice Mechanisms: A Sustainable Human Development Perspective from Eastern DRC.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 2, no. 3: 398–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Benda-Beckmann, Franz. 1984. “Law Out of Context: A Comment on the Creation of Traditional Law Discussion.” Journal of African Law 28, nos. 1–2: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 2016. “Transformative Reparations? A Critical Look at a Current Trend in Thinking About Gender-Just Reparations.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 10, no. 1: 108–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, Carlton. 2009. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Moral Agency and the Role of Victims in Reparations Programs.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 31, no. 1: 257–94.Google Scholar
Weber, Sanne. 2018. “From Victims and Mothers to Citizens: Gender-Just Transformative Reparations and the Need for Public and Private Transitions.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 12, no. 1: 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Ralph. 2006. “Participation in the Right of Access to Adequate Housing.” Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law 14, no. 2: 269–94.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, David. 2008. Trials of Reason: Plato and the Crafting of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Andrew, and Ratner, R. S.. 2008. Informal Reckonings: Conflict Resolution in Mediation, Restorative Justice, and Reparations. New York: Routledge-Cavendish.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarwood, Lisa, ed. 2014. Women and Transitional Justice: The Experience of Women as Participants. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, James E. 1992. “The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today.” Critical Inquiry 18, no. 2: 267–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, James E. 1993. The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Young, James E. 2000. At Memory’s Edge: After-Images of the Holocaust in Contemporary Art and Architecture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Young, James E. 2002. “Germany’s Holocaust Memorial Problem––and Mine.” The Public Historian 24, no. 4: 65–80.Google Scholar
Zamora Prieto, Angélica. 2009. “La Reparación a Partir De La Experiencia De Las Víctimas: Los Casos De Villatina y Trujillo.” In Reparar En Colombia Los Dilemas En Contextos De Conflicto, Pobreza y Exclusión, edited by Gómez Díaz Catalina, Sánchez Nelson Camilo, and Uprimny Rodrigo Yepes, 347–461, Bogotá: Centro Internacional de la Justica Transicional y Centros de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad.Google Scholar
Zubillaga, Verónica, Llorens, Manuel, and Souto, John. 2015. “Chismosas and Alcahuetas: Being the Mother of an Empistolado within the Everyday Armed Violence of a Caracas Barrio.” In Violence at the Urban Margins, edited by Auyero, Javier, Bourgois, Philippe, and Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, 162–88. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuloaga, Patricia Palacios. 2020. “Judging Inter-American Human Rights: The Riddle of Compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 42, no. 2: 392–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar