No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Limits of Legal Realism as Biography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1996
References
1 397 U. S. 254 (1970).Google Scholar
2 353 U. S. 657 (1957).Google Scholar
3 352 U. S. 964 (1957).Google Scholar
4 369 U. S. 186 (1962).Google Scholar
5 376 U. S. 254 (1964).Google Scholar
6 405 U. S. 438 (1972).Google Scholar
7 397 U. S. 254 (1970).Google Scholar
8 358 U. S. 1 (1958).Google Scholar
9 381 U. S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
10 410 U. S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
11 418 U. S. 683 (1974).Google Scholar
12 Brennan, William J. Jr., Speech at the Text and Teaching Symposium, Georgetown University, 12 Oct. 1985, in Paul G. Cassell, ed., The Great Debate: Interpreting the Written Constitution 11 (Washington: Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies, 1986).Google Scholar
13 Wermiel, Stephen J., “The Nomination of Justice Brennan: Eisenhower's Mistake? A Look at the Historical Record,” 11 Const. Comm. 515, 515 (1994–95).Google Scholar
14 Id. at 515–16.Google Scholar
15 Id. at 524.Google Scholar
16 Id. at 537.Google Scholar
17 Id. at 525 n.47.Google Scholar
18 For example, on p. 63, Eisler recounts that New Jersey was, during the 1940s, “generally regarded to have the most antiquated and arcane court system in the nation.” On the following page, he repeats nearly the exact same thought: “At the time the New Jersey courts were considered the worst in the country.”Google Scholar
19 370 U. S. 660 (1962).Google Scholar