Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T20:40:36.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Courts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This article offers a theoretical discussion about courts in “hybrid regimes” that evolve from formerly democratic countries. The evolution toward authoritarianism typically allows governments more latitude to reduce judicial independence and judicial power. Yet, several reasons, including legitimacy costs, a tradition of using courts for judicial adjudication and social control, and even the use of courts for quenching dissent may discourage rulers from shutting down the judicial contestation arena and encourage them instead to appeal to less overbearing measures. This usually leads to a decline of the judiciary's proclivity to challenge the government, especially in salient cases. To illustrate these dynamics, I discuss the rise and fall of judicial power in Venezuela under Chávez's rule, focusing on the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court. Formerly the most powerful institution in the country's history, the Chamber briefly emerged as an influential actor at the beginning of the regime, but a comprehensive intervention of the judiciary in 2004 further politicized the court and effectively reduced its policy-making role.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abente‐Brun, Diego. 2009. Paraguay: The Unraveling of One‐Party Rule. Journal of Democracy 20:143–56.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and their Audiences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blanco, Carlos, ed. 1993. Venezuela, del Siglo XX al Siglo XXI: Un Proyecto para Construirla [Venezuela, from the 20th to the 21st Century: A Blueprint] . Comisión Presidencial para la Reforma del Estado (COPRE) and Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). Caracas, Venezuela: Editorial Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
Brewer‐Carías, Allan R. 1998. Derecho y Acción de Amparo, Volumen V, Instituciones Políticas y Constitucionales [The Law of Amparo, in Political and Constitutional Institutions, vol. 5] . Caracas, Venezuela: Editorial Jurídica Venezolana.Google Scholar
Brewer‐Carías, Allan R. 2004. La Sala Constitucional vs. El Estado Democrático de Derecho: El Secuestro del Poder Electoral y de la Sala Electoral del Tribunal Supremo y la Confiscación del Derecho a la Participación Política [The Constitutional Chamber vs. the Democratic Rule of Law: The Kidnapping of the Electoral Branch of Power and the Electoral Chamber of the Supreme Court; and the Confiscation of the Right to Political Participation] . Caracas, Venezuela: El Nacional.Google Scholar
Brewer‐Carías, Allan R. 2008. Constitutional Protections of Human Rights in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer‐Carías, Allan R. 2009. Reforma Constitucional, Asamblea Nacional Constituyente y Control Judicial Contencioso Administrativo. El Caso de Honduras (2009) y el Antecedente Venezolano (1999) [Constitutional Reform, Constitutional Assembly, and Administrative Judicial Review. The Honduran Case (2009) and the Venezuelan Antecedent (1999)]. http://www.allanbrewercarias.com (accessed November 10, 2009).Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel. 2009. “Faithful Servants of the Regime”—The Brazilian Constitutional Court's Role under the 1988 Constitution. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 3–6, inToronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics 49:430–51.Google Scholar
Consorcio Justicia. 2008. Reporte de Independencia Judicial[Report on Judicial Independence]. Caracas, Venezuela (in the author's possession).Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1997. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier, and Penfold, Michael. 2007. Venezuela: Crowding Out the Opposition. Journal of Democracy 18 (2): 99113.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier, and Penfold, Michael. 2011. Dragon in the Tropics: Hugo Chávez and the Political Economy of Revolution in Venezuela. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. Thinking about Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy 13:2135.Google Scholar
Ellett, Rachel. 2008. Emerging Judicial Power in Transitional Democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. PhD diss. in Public and International Affairs, Department of Political Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 2008. Rethinking Venezuelan Politics: Class, Conflict and the Chávez Phenomenon. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve, and Hellinger, Daniel, eds. 2004. Venezuelan Politics in the Chávez Era: Class, Polarization and Conflict. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2001. The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government. Law & Society Review 35:117–64.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir. 2008. Introduction. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 122. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Carlo, and Pederzoli, Patrizia, eds. 2002. The Power of Judges. A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammergren, Linn. 2007. Envisioning Reform: Conceptual and Practical Obstacles to Improving Judicial Performance in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2002. The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court‐Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy. American Political Science Review 96:305–20.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts under Constraints: Courts, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Ríos‐Figueroa, Julio, eds. 2011. Courts in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2007. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2004. Rigging the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence under Siege in Venezuela. http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2004/06/16/rigging‐rule‐law (accessed April 4, 2010).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2008. A Decade under Chávez. http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2008/09/22/decade‐under‐ch‐vez (accessed April 4, 2010).Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2007. Challenging Decisions: High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. PhD diss., Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana, and Taylor, Matthew M. 2008. Doing Courts Justice? Studying Judicial Politics in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics 6:741–67.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1995. The Hybrid Regimes of Central America. Journal of Democracy 6:7286.Google Scholar
Laguna Navas, Rubén. 2005. La Sala Constitucional del Tribunal Supremo de Justicia: Su Rol como Máxima y Última Intérprete de la Constitución [The Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court: Its Role as Final and Definitive Interpreter of the Constitution] . Caracas, Venezuela: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
Larkins, Christopher. 1998. The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina. Comparative Politics 30 (4): 423–42.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 1999. Fujimori and Post‐Party Politics in Peru. Journal of Democracy 10:7892.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2002. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13:5165.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Louza Scognamiglio, Laura. 2005. El Gobierno Judicial y la Independencia del Poder Judicial en Venezuela a partir de 1999 [Judicial Administration and Independence of the Judiciary in Venezuela after 1999]. Masters thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. http://www.cejamericas.org/doc/documentos/tesina_gobiernojudicialindependencia.pdf (accessed March 29, 2010).Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2003. Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico. In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher, 266306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer L., and Myers, David J., eds. 2006. The Unraveling of Representative Democracy in Venezuela. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Merryman, John, and Pérez‐Perdomo, Rogelio. 2007. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America, 3rd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Molina Galicia, René. 2002. Reflexiones sobre una Visión Constitucional del Proceso, y su Tendencia Jurisprudencial. ¿Hacia un Gobierno Judicial?[A Constitutional Perspective of the Judicial Process, and Its Jurisprudential Trends] . Caracas, Venezuela: Ediciones Paredes.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2003. Law versus the State: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (4): 883930.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio, and Ríos‐Figueroa, Julio. 2005. The Constitutional Adjudication Mosaic of Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 38:189217.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5:5569.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies. In The Self‐Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, ed Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Marc F., 2952. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2000. The Judiciary and the Rule of Law. Journal of Democracy 11:2531.Google Scholar
Organization of American States: Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights. 2009. Democracy and Human Rights in Venezuela. http://cidh.org/pdfpercent20files/VENEZUELApercent202009percent20ENG.pdf (accessed May 2, 2010).Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony. 2005. Political (In)Justice, Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile and Argentina. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Pérez‐Perdomo, Rogelio. 1993. Crisis Politica y Sistema Judicial en Venezuela [Political Crisis and the Judiciary in Venezuela]. Revista del Centro de Estudios Constitucionales 16:95112.Google Scholar
Pérez‐Perdomo, Rogelio. 2003. Venezuela, 1958–1999: The Legal System in an Impaired Democracy. In Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe, ed. Friedman, Lawrence and Pérez‐Perdomo, Rogelio, 414–78. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez‐Perdomo, Rogelio. 2005. Judicialization and Regime Change: The Venezuelan Supreme Court. In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, ed. Sieder, Rachel, Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan, 131–59. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pérez‐Perdomo, Rogelio. 2006. Una Evaluación de la Reforma Judicial en Venezuela. Paper presented at the meeting “Judicial Reform in Latin America: An Assessment for Policymakers,” organized by the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Judicial Studies Center of the Americas, June 6, inWashington, DC.Google Scholar
Pérez‐Perdomo, Rogelio. 2007. Medio Siglo de Historia Judicial en Venezuela [Half a Century of Judicial History in Venezuela]. Cuadernos Unimetanos 11:323.Google Scholar
Quintero Tirado, Mariolga. 1988. Justicia y Realidad: Un Enfoque Analítico de la Administración de Justicia en la Venezuela Contemporánea [Justice and Reality: An Analysis of the Judiciary in Contemporary Venezuela]. Caracas, Venezuela: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
Ríos‐Figueroa, Julio. 2007. Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico: 1994–2002. Latin American Politics and Society 49:3157.Google Scholar
Sanchez Urribarri, Raul. 2007. News from the Comparative Realm. Newsletter of the Law & Courts Section of the American Political Science Association Spring:1113.Google Scholar
Sanchez Urribarri, Raul. 2010. Judges and Their Loyalties: A Comparative Analysis Focused on the Venezuelan Supreme Court. PhD diss., Department of Political Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M., and Morgenstern, Scott. 2008. Candidate Recruitment and Selection in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Latin American Studies 50:2758.Google Scholar
Smilde, David, and Hellinger, Daniel, eds. Forthcoming. Participation, Politics and Culture in Venezuela's Bolivarian Democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Peter. 2007. Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes. World Politics 60:122–45.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal. 1993. Courts and Crisis Regimes: A Theory Sketch with Asian Case Studies Political Research Quarterly 46:311–38.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, and Haynie, Stacia L. 1993. Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts: A Time Series Analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961–1987. Law & Society Review 27:707–40.Google Scholar
Toharia, José J. 1975. Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain. Law & Society Review 9:475–96.Google Scholar
Trochev, Alexei. 2008. Judging Russia: The Role of the Constitutional Court in Russian Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verner, Joel G. 1984. The Independence of Supreme Courts in Latin America: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Latin American Studies 16:463506.Google Scholar
Woods, Patricia, and Hilbink, Lisa. 2009. Comparative Sources of Judicial Empowerment: Ideas and Interests. Political Research Quarterly 62:745–52.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs 76:2243.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

2000‐0001. Emery Mata Millán vs. Ministro del Interior y Justicia (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/Enero/01‐200100‐00‐002.htm).Google Scholar
2000‐0002. Domingo Gustavo Ramírez vs. Ministerio de Justicia and others (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/Enero/02‐200100‐00‐001.htm).Google Scholar
2001‐0093. Corporación de Turismo de Venezuela CORPOTURISMO (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/febrero/93‐060201‐00‐1529%20.htm).Google Scholar
2002‐2150. Federación de Institutos Autónomos y Empresas del Estado (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/Septiembre/2150‐030902‐02‐1397.htm).Google Scholar
2002‐2241. Andrés Velásquez, Elías Mata y Enrique Márquez (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/septiembre/2241‐240902‐00‐2874%20.htm).Google Scholar
2005‐3210. Jesús Manuel Quijada y Henry Ramos Allup (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/consulta_sala.asp?sala=005&dia=27/10/2005&nombre=Sala%20Constitucional) (no longer available).Google Scholar
2007‐0956. Alexandra Stuparic, Rusbely Cardona y Otros (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/Mayo/956‐250507‐07‐0720.htm).Google Scholar
2000‐0001. Emery Mata Millán vs. Ministro del Interior y Justicia (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/Enero/01‐200100‐00‐002.htm).Google Scholar
2000‐0002. Domingo Gustavo Ramírez vs. Ministerio de Justicia and others (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/Enero/02‐200100‐00‐001.htm).Google Scholar
2001‐0093. Corporación de Turismo de Venezuela CORPOTURISMO (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/febrero/93‐060201‐00‐1529%20.htm).Google Scholar
2002‐2150. Federación de Institutos Autónomos y Empresas del Estado (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/Septiembre/2150‐030902‐02‐1397.htm).Google Scholar
2002‐2241. Andrés Velásquez, Elías Mata y Enrique Márquez (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/septiembre/2241‐240902‐00‐2874%20.htm).Google Scholar
2005‐3210. Jesús Manuel Quijada y Henry Ramos Allup (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/consulta_sala.asp?sala=005&dia=27/10/2005&nombre=Sala%20Constitucional) (no longer available).Google Scholar
2007‐0956. Alexandra Stuparic, Rusbely Cardona y Otros (http://www.tsj.gov.ve/decisiones/scon/Mayo/956‐250507‐07‐0720.htm).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Constitución de la República de Venezuela (1961, with amendments). Gaceta Oficial Extraordinaria No. 3.357. March 2, 1984.Google Scholar
Constitución de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela. Gaceta Oficial Extraordinaria No. 5.453. March 24, 2000 (also referred to as the 1999 Constitution or Bolivarian Constitution).Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica de Amparo sobre Derechos y Garantías Constitucionales—Gaceta Oficial No. 34.060. September 27, 1988 (referred to as the Organic Statute of Constitutional Rights and Guarantees).Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica de la Corte Suprema de Justicia. Gaceta Oficial Extraordinaria No. 1.893. July 30, 1976 (referred to as the Organic Law of the Supreme Court of Justice).Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica del Tribunal Supremo de Justicia. Gaceta Oficial No. 37.942. May 20, 2004 (recently reformed on October 1, 2010, published in Gaceta Oficial No. 39.522; referred to as the Organic Law of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, LOTSJ).Google Scholar