Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T19:25:33.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competencia política y gasto particularista de los gobiernos subnacionales en México y Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

María Alejandra Armesto
María Alejandra Armesto*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Cuajimalpa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Resumen

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Las hipótesis sobre la relación entre competencia política y gasto particularista predicen consecuencias opuestas. Una sugiere que la competencia política —el gobierno sin mayoría<— constriñe al ejecutivo y reduce el particularismo, la perspectiva opuesta predice un mayor particularismo como resultado del intercambio de apoyo legislativo por beneficios. Ambas descansan sobre un supuesto que no siempre se cumple: la presencia de actores con poder de veto en el congreso. Este artículo argumenta que este supuesto es crucial para ambas hipótesis y muestra que allí donde aquel no se cumple estas últimas no se sostienen. Explora los efectos del gobierno con y sin mayoría en contextos de debilidad institucional del congreso a través de un análisis del gasto en bienes públicos locales de los gobiernos subnacionales en México y Argentina y muestra que el gobierno sin mayoría no conduce a ninguno de los resultados anticipados por los modelos existentes.

Abstract

Abstract

The existing hypotheses about the relationship between political competition and particularistic spending predict opposite consequences. One view suggests that political competition—divided government—constrains the executive and reduces particularism; the opposite perspective predicts greater particularism as a result of side payments in exchange for legislative support. Both hypotheses rest on the assumption, which is not always true, that partisan veto players are present in the legislature. This article argues that this assumption is crucial for both hypotheses and shows that where this condition is not met the predictions do not hold. The article explores the effects of government with and without a majority on particularistic spending where legislatures are institutionally weak. To do so, it analyzes spending on local public goods by subnational governments in Mexico and Argentina and shows that government without a majority does not lead to any of the results anticipated by existing models.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , 2015 , pp. 160 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

Parte de la presente investigación fue financiada por una beca Seed Money Grant y una beca Dissertation Year Fellowship del Kellogg Institute for International Studies de la Universidad de Notre Dame, Estados Unidos. Jorge Asso, Alejandra Pereda, Benjamín Pérez y Diego Tolosa contribuyeron en la elaboración de la base de datos. Agradezco especialmente el apoyo de Frances Hagopian, Scott Mainwaring, Michael Coppedge y Benjamin Radcliff en distintas etapas de este proyecto. Asimismo, agradezco a Allyson Benton, María Escobar-Lemmon, Francisco Sánchez y a los dictaminadores anónimos de Latin American Research Review las valiosas sugerencias. Cualquier error u omisión es mi exclusiva responsabilidad.

References

Referencias

Adserà, Alicia, Boix, Carles y Payne, Mark 2003 “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government”. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19 (2): 445–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhmedov, Akhmed, y Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina 2004 “Opportunistic Political Cycles: Test in a Young Democracy Setting”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (4): 1301–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, Lee J., y Mueller, Bernardo 2006 “Pork for Policy: Executive and Legislative Exchange in Brazil”. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22 (1): 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, y Snyder, James M. Jr. 2006 “Party Control of State Government and the Distribution of Public Expenditures”. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108 (4): 547–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arretche, Marta, y Rodden, Jonathan 2004 “Política distributiva na federação: Estratégias eleitorais, barganhas legislativas e coalizões de governo”. Dados 47 (3): 549–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles 1997 “A Test of the Independent Influences of Electoral Competition and Party Strength in a Model of State Policy-Making”. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1462–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles 2000 “Party Strength, Party Change and Policy-Making in the American States”. Party Politics 6 (1): 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles, Holbrook, Thomas y Langer, Laura 2002 “Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy”. American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Caroline C. 2006 “Judicial Performance and the Rule of Law in the Mexican States”. Latin American Politics and Society 48 (3): 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Allyson 2003 “Presidentes fuertes, provincias poderosas: El caso de Argentina”. Política y Gobierno 10 (1): 103–137.Google Scholar
Benton, Allyson 2009 “What Makes Strong Federalism Seem Weak? Fiscal Resources and Presidential-Provincial Relations in Argentina”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39 (4): 651–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, D. K., y Wassmer, Robert W. 1995 “Fiscal Dynamics of Local Elected Officials”. Public Choice 83 (3-4): 221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier, y Schleifer, Andrei 2001 “Federalism with and without Political Centralization: China versus Russia”. Número especial, IMF Staff Papers 48:171–179.Google Scholar
Bowers, Jake, y Drake, Katherine W. 2005 “EDA for HLM: Visualization when Probabilistic Inference Fails”. Political Analysis 13 (4): 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casadei, Estefanía, Frers, Luciana Díaz, y Barón, Andrés Lajer 2011 Provincial Budget Transparency in Argentina. Working Paper No. 57, Centro de Implementación de Políticas Públicas para la Equidad y el Crecimiento (CIPPEC), Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Casar, María Amparo 2008 “Los gobiernos sin mayoría en México: 1997-2006”. Política y Gobierno 15 (2): 221–270.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Kausik, y Dasgupta, Sugato 2006 “The Political Determinants of Fiscal Policies in the States of India: An Empirical Investigation”. Journal of Development Studies 42 (4): 640–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, Rebecca Bill 2003 “The Construction of the Rule of Law in Argentina: A Tale of Two Provinces”. Comparative Politics 35 (4): 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, Rebecca Bill 2004a “The Evolution of Judicial Autonomy in Argentina: Establishing the Rule of Law in an Ultrapresidential System”. Journal of Latin American Studies 36 (3): 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavez, Rebecca Bill 2004b The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio 2002 “Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential Democracies”. Comparative Political Studies 35 (3): 284–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, Matthew R. 2007 “Electoral Competition, Participation, and Government Responsiveness in Mexico”. American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael 1993 “Parties and Society in Mexico and Venezuela: Why Competition Matters”. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., y McCubbins, Matthew D. 1986 “Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game”. Journal of Politics 48 (2): 370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., y McCubbins, Matthew D. 2001 “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes”. En Presidents, Parliaments and Policy, editado por Haggard, Stephan y McCubbins, Mathew D., 21–63. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Matz, y Johansson, Eva 2002 “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments”. American Political Science Review 96 (1): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott, y Cantú, Francisco 2010 The New Federalism of Mexico's Party System. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Estévez, Federico, Magaloni, Beatriz En prensa Strategies of Vote Buying: Democracy, Clientelism and Poverty Relief in Mexico.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, y Londregan, John 1996 “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics”. Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1132–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Kent 2005 “Menem and the Governors: Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s”. En Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, editado por Levitsky, Steven y Murillo, María Victoria, 88–114. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent, y Dickovick, J. Tyler 2004 “The Politics of Re-Centralization in Argentina and Brazil”. Latin American Research Review 39 (1): 90–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John 1986 “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control”. Public Choice 50 (1): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Albertos, José, y Lapuente, Víctor 2011 “Doomed to Disagree? Party-Voter Discipline and Policy Gridlock under Divided Government”. Party Politics 17 (6): 801–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreres, Orlando 2005 Dos siglos de economía argentina. Buenos Aires: Fundación Norte y Sur.Google Scholar
Finkel, Jodi 2004 “Judicial Reform in Argentina in the 1990s: How Electoral Incentives Shape Institutional Change”. Latin American Research Review 39 (3): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Jodi 2005 “Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy: Mexico in the 1990s”. Latin American Politics and Society 47 (1): 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981 Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara 1994 Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, Jorge P. 2002 “The Political and Partisan Determinants of Patronage in Latin America 1960-1994: A Comparative Perspective”. European Journal of Political Research 41 (4): 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D. 2006 “Electoral Competition and Democratic Responsiveness: A Defense of the Marginality Hypothesis”. Journal of Politics 68 (4): 911–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecock, R. Douglas 2006 “Electoral Competition, Globalization, and Subnational Education Spending in Mexico, 1999-2004”. American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 950–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández Rodríguez, Rogelio 2005 “Conflicto y colaboración entre poderes: La experiencia reciente de los gobiernos divididos en México.” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 21 (1): 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., y Klemmensen, Robert 2008 “Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective”. Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1997 “Evaluating Argentina's Presidential Democracy: 1983-1995”. En Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, editado por Mainwaring, Scott y Shugart, Matthew S., 259–299. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khemani, Stuti 2004 “Political Cycles in a Developing Economy: Effect of Elections in the Indian States”. Journal of Development Economics 73 (1): 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert 2000 “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities”. Comparative Political Studies 33 (6-7): 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneebone, Ronald D., y McKenzie, Kenneth J. 2001 “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Fiscal Policy: An Examination of Canadian Provinces”. International Tax and Public Finance 8 (5-6): 753–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejía Acosta, Andrés 2009 Informal Coalitions and Policy-Making in Latin America: Ecuador in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikesell, John L. 1978 “Election Periods and State Tax Policy Cycles”. Public Choice 33 (3): 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, y Manzetti, Luigi 2003 “Legislative Oversight: Interests and Institutions in the United States and Argentina”. En Democratic Accountability in Latin America, editado por Mainwaring, Scott y Welna, Christopher, 132–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nacif, Benito 2002 “Understanding Party Discipline in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies: The Centralized Party Model”. En Legislative Politics in Latin America, editado por Morgenstern, Scott y Nacif, Benito, 254–284. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo 1996 “Another Institutionalization: Latin America and Elsewhere”. Working Paper No. 222, Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
Petry, François, Imbeau, Louis M., Crête, Jean y Clavet, Michel 1999 “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in the Canadian Provinces”. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 32 (2): 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raudenbush, Stephen W., y Bryk, Anthony S. 2002 Hierarchical Linear Models. 2a ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 2007 “The Political Economy of Patronage: Expenditure Patterns in the Argentine Provinces, 1983-2003”. Journal of Politics 69 (2): 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen L., y Wibbels, Erik 2000 “The Subnational Politics of Economic Adjustment: Provincial Politics and Fiscal Performance in Argentina”. Comparative Political Studies 33 (4): 419–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William 1964 Federalism: Origin, Operation, and Significance. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ríos Cázares, Alejandra 2009 Instituciones políticas estatales y presupuesto: Las causas de la discrecionalidad. México, DF: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Ríos-Figueroa, Julio 2007 “Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico, 1994-2002”. Latin American Politics and Society 49 (1): 31–57.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., y Ward, Peter M. 1994 Political Change in Baja California: Democracy in the Making? San Diego, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., y Ward, Peter M. 1995, eds. Opposition Government in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Solé-Ollé, Albert 2006 “The Effects of Party Competition on Budget Outcomes: Empirical Evidence from Local Governments in Spain”. Public Choice 126 (1-2): 145–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George 1995 “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartism”. British Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veiga, Linda Gonçalves, y Veiga, Francisco José 2007 “Political Business Cycles at the Municipal Level”. Public Choice 131 (1-2): 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibbels, Erik 2000 “Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance”. American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibbels, Erik 2001 “Federal Politics and Market Reform in the Developing World”. Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (2): 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibbels, Erik 2005 Federalism and the Market: Intergovernmental Conflict and Economic Reform in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, Donald 1989 “Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results”. Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): 1395–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar