Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-5pczc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:30:53.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vowel change across time, space, and conversational topic: the use of localized features in former mining communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2020

Thomas Devlin
Affiliation:
University of Huddersfield
Peter French
Affiliation:
University of York
Carmen Llamas
Affiliation:
University of York

Abstract

This study focuses on speakers who continue to use forms that are recessive in a community, and the phonological and conversational contexts in which recessive forms persist. Use of a local, recessive form is explored across males from four ex-mining communities in Northeast England. Older speakers, who lived in the area when the mines were open, frequently produce the localized variant of the mouth vowel, especially in speech produced during conversation about the locally resonant topic of mining, and, most frequently, in communities closest to the location with which the form is associated. Conversely, speakers born since the loss of mining and with little connection to the industry hardly produce the local form in any community or conversational topic. Exploring conversational topic provides evidence for the connections between shifting social contexts and sound change, specifically that speakers retain otherwise recessive features in speech concerning topics which are locally resonant to them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adank, Patti, Van Hout, Roeland, & Smits, Roel. (2004). An Acoustic Description of the Vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 116:1729–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atkinson, John. (2011). Linguistic variation and change in a North-East border town: a sociolinguistic study of Darlington. Doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan. (2000). From Geordie Ridley to Viz: Popular Literature in Tyneside English. Language and Literature 9:343–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan. (2004). Geordie Nation: Language and Identity in the North-east of England. Lore and Language 17:3348.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan, Burbano-Elizondo, Lourdes, & Llamas, Carmen. (2012). Urban North-Eastern English: Tyneside to Teesside. ‘Edinburgh Dialects of English’ series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Kara. (2009). /r/ and the construction of place identity on New York City's Lower East Side. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:634–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. (2012). Praat v.5.3.35. http://www.praat.org (accessed 8/12/12).Google Scholar
Britain, David. (1991). Dialect and space: a geolinguistic study of speech variables in the Fens. Doctoral dissertation, Essex University.Google Scholar
Britain, David. (2000). The difference that space makes: an evaluation of the application of human geographic thought in sociolinguistic dialectology. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Britain, David. (2005). Innovation diffusion, ‘Estuary English’ and local dialect differentiation: the survival of Fenland Englishes. Linguistics 43 (5):9951022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. (2008). When is a change not a change?: a case study on the dialect origins of New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 20:187223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. (2011). The heterogenous homogenisation of dialects in England. Taal & Tongval 63:4360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David & Sudbury, Andrea. (2007). What can the Falkland Islands tell us about Diphthong Shift?Essex Research Reports in Linguistics. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack (1973). Canadian raising. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 18:113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack & Trudgill, Peter. (1998). Dialectology. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Hugo. (1984). Why the miners won't give in. The Observer 29/7/1984.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard, Foulkes, Paul, Milroy, James, Milroy, Lesley & Walshaw, David. (1997). Descriptive adequacy in phonology: a variationist perspective. Journal of Linguistics 33:275310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham Record Office. (2012). Coal Mining and Durham Collieries, http://www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/Pages/CoalminingandDurhamcollieries.aspx (accessed 8/12/12)Google Scholar
Dyer, Judy. (2002). “We all speak the same round here”: Dialect levelling in a Scottish-English community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6:99116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichhorn, Julie, Kent, Raymond, Austin, Diane & Vorperian, Houri. (2018). Effects of aging on vowel fundamental frequency and vowel formants in men and women. Journal of Voice 32(5):644.e1644.e9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, Alexander. (1889). On Early English Pronunciation. London: Truebner & Co.Google Scholar
Eustace, Sinclair. (1969). The meaning of the palaeotype in A. J. Ellis's On Early English Pronunciation 1869–89. Transactions of the Philological Society 68:3179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (2013). Entering the community: fieldwork. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, N. (Eds.) Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 1937.Google Scholar
Ferragne, Emmanuel & Pellegrino, François. (2010). Formant frequencies of vowels in 13 accents of the British Isles. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40 (1):134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard. (2001). Variation and change in British English (r). In van de Velde, H. & van Hout, R. (Eds.), r-atics: Sociolinguistic, Phonetic and Phonological Characteristics of/r/. Brussels: ILVP.Google Scholar
Friedman, Howard & Schustack, Miriam. (2003). Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research. Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen. (1997). Words and voices: perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego: Academic Press. 3366.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jennifer, Maclagan, Margaret, Sudbury, Andrea & Trudgill, Peter. (2004). New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Bill. (2007). Pitmatic: The Talk of the North East Coalfields. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Northumbria University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Drager, Katie. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48:865–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Foulkes, Paul. (2016). The evolution of medial (-t-) over real and remembered time. Language 92 (2):298330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazen, Kirk & Hamilton, Sarah. (2008). A dialect turned inside out: Migration and the Appalachian diaspora. Journal of English Linguistics 36 (2):105–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Historical Geographical Information System Project. (2014). A Vision of Britain Through Time, http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/census (accessed 28/3/16).Google Scholar
Howell, Peter, Barry, William, & Vinson, David. (2006). Strength of British English accents in altered listening conditions. Perception and Psychophysics 68:139–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, Paul. (1985). Linguistic atlases and sociolinguistics. In Kirk, J. M. (Ed.), A Reader in Sociophonetics (Trends in Linguistics Studies & Monographs No. 219). New York: De Gruyter. 4469.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. (2004). Place, Globalization, and Linguistic Variation. In Fought, C. (Ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 6583.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. (2010). Indexing the local. In Coupland, N. (Ed.), Handbook of Language and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 386405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Bhasin, Neeta & Wittkofski, Denise. (2002). “Dahntahn Pittsburgh”: Monophthongal /Aw/ and Representations of Localness in Southwestern Pennsylvania. American Speech 77:148–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara & Kiesling, Scott. (2008). Indexicality and experience: exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongisation in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (1):533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. (2002). Models of linguistic change and diffusion: New evidence from dialect levelling in British English. Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 6:187216.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. (2003). Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In Britain, D. & Cheshire, J. (Eds.), Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans. (1940). Dialect areas, settlement areas, and cultural areas in the United States. In Ware, C. F. (Ed.), The Cultural Approach to History. New York: Macmillan. 331–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2003). Pursuing the cascade model. In Britain, D. & Cheshire, J. (Eds.), Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. (2003). Phonetic Data Analysis: An Introduction to Fieldwork and Instrumental Techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lawson, Robert. (2009). Sociolinguistic constructions of identity among adolescent males in Glasgow. Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. (1985). Acts of Identity: creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Llamas, Carmen. (1999). A new methodology: data elicitation for social and regional language variation studies. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 7:95119.Google Scholar
Llamas, Carmen. (2001). Language Variation and Innovation in Teesside English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Llamas, Carmen. (2007). ‘A place between places’: language and identities in a border town. Language in Society 36(4):579604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llamas, Carmen, Watt, Dominic & Johnson, Dan. (2009). Linguistic accommodation and the salience of national identity markers in a border town. Journal of Language & Social Psychology 28(4):381407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, Jessica & Walker, Abby. (2013). Football versus football: Effect of topic on /r/ realization in American and English sports fans. Language and Speech 56:443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCord, Norman. (1979). North East England: The Region's Development 1760–1960. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
McNair, Lisa. (2002). Mill Villagers and Farmers: Dialect and Economics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma, Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie. (2003). Probabilistic sociolinguistics. In Bod, R., Hay, J. & Jannedy, S. (Eds.), Probability Theory in Linguistics. Cambridge: MIT Press. 98138.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris & Beal, Joan. (2011). Perceptual Dialectology. In Maguire, W. & McMahon, A. (Eds.), Analysing Variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 121–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics. (2012). 2011 Census Data for England and Wales on Nomis. http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/local_characteristics (accessed 3/12/13).Google Scholar
Orton, Harold. (1962). Introduction. The Survey of English Dialects. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold & Dieth, Eugen (1962–1971). (Eds.), The Survey of English Dialects. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Pearce, Michael. (2009). A Perceptual Dialect Map of North East England. Journal of English Linguistics 37:162–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing v.3.5.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org (accessed 2/7/18).Google Scholar
Reubold, Ulrich, Harrington, Jonathan & Kleber, Felicitas. (2010). Vocal aging effects on F0 and the first formant: a longitudinal analysis in adult speakers. Speech Communication 52:638–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Hazel, Haddican, William & Foulkes, Paul. 2009. Exhibiting standards in the FACE of dialect levelling. Paper presented at ICLaVE5, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, June 2009.Google Scholar
Schilling, Natalie. (2013). Investigating stylistic variation. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, N. (Eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 327–49.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie. (2002). On the nature of isolated and post-isolated dialects: Innovation, variation, and differentiation. Journal of Sociolinguistics (Special issue on Investigating Change and Variation through Dialect Contact, ed. by Lesley Milroy), 6(1):6485.Google Scholar
Stoddart, Jana, Upton, Clive & Widdowson, John. (1999). Sheffield dialect in the 1990s: Revisiting the concept of NORMs. In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (Eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold. 7289.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). Linguistic Change and Diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3:215–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Dominic. (2002). ‘I don't speak with a geordie accent. I speak, like, the northeaccent’: contact-induced levelling in the Tyneside vowel system. Journal Sociolinguistics (1):4463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Dominic & Milroy, Lesley. (1999). Variation in three Tyneside vowels: is this dialect levelling? In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (Eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold. 2546.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic & Tillotson, Jennifer. (2001). A spectrographic analysis of vowel fronting in Bradford English. English World-Wide 22:69302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, John. (1982). The Accents of English. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. L. & McCay, N. A. J. (1998). Reclamation of the Durham Coast. In Fox, H., Moore, H., & McIntosh, A. (Eds.), Land Reclamation: achieving sustainable benefits. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema. 209–18.Google Scholar
Williams, Ann & Kerswill, Paul. (1999). Dialect levelling: change and continuity in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull. In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (Eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold. 141–62.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (2003). Enclave dialect communities in the South. In Nagle, S. & Sanders, S. (Eds.), English in the Southern United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. (1999). Alternative models of dialect death: Dissipation vs. concentration. Language 75 (3):486521.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. (1996). Phonetic evidence for the evolution of lexical classes: The case of a Montreal French vowel shift. In Guy, G., Feagin, C., Baugh, J., & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.), Toward a Social Science of Language. Benjamins: Philadelphia. 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah & Kemp, William. (1992). Lexical classes in Montreal French. Language and Speech 35:251–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar